Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Kids told police dad hit daughter in head (Christine Trial)
oregonlive.com ^ | 5/01/02 | JEFF BARNARD

Posted on 05/01/2002 3:33:06 PM PDT by RGSpincich

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: sinkspur
I think you may have properly ID'd this guy.

He does seem to have a somewhat tenuous attachment to reality...

21 posted on 05/01/2002 5:19:39 PM PDT by Poohbah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
He does seem to have a somewhat tenuous attachment to reality...

And a fixation on threads about parents who knock their children around.

22 posted on 05/01/2002 5:22:50 PM PDT by sinkspur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: gore3000
bttt
23 posted on 05/01/2002 5:58:03 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
Get help

I think that means he'll contact Demidog.

24 posted on 05/01/2002 6:01:56 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad
me...

Tell me about busing---to begin with...what was that all about!

What's next?

POOBALL...

Please try to put your statements in some sort of context--it makes it easier for those of us who can't read minds to figure out what you're saying.

13 posted on 5/1/02 2:56 PM Hawaii-Aleutian by Poohbah

Where do you get your thinking--operations--orders from...janet reno?

Tough question...busing?

25 posted on 05/01/2002 6:08:21 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe ; TruthWillWin
"We've got a pair of parents that saw a local agency of government totally out of control -- acting illegally, acting immorally," Steele said. "They got (the children) out of harm's way."

The Christines fired their court appointed attorney for this? From plea bargain to bargain basement. This is the kind of defense that would make the Grants Pass crowd proud. Of course, Brian and Ruth will have to serve the time but, hey, it's for the cause.

Believe it or not Steele uses the same rhetoric in his presentations to the court.

26 posted on 05/01/2002 6:35:07 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
These parents are self-absorbed dysfunctional arrogant negligent lunatics and it was just a matter of time before one of those little girls ended up dead in their "care."
27 posted on 05/01/2002 6:37:53 PM PDT by ValerieUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ValerieUSA
Madame cleo or something somebody called me on the evo thread...how do you know all this?
28 posted on 05/01/2002 6:44:56 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
The poor wack job parents. Why can't the state just let them raise their children in private ?
29 posted on 05/01/2002 6:45:43 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
bttt
30 posted on 05/01/2002 6:49:22 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Update with testimony from Brian and Ruth.

Brian says he didn't lose his temper and that Lydia wet the bed in an act of defiance. He just "tapped" her and then she lost her balance. She fell and received a minor cut according to Brian.

Ruth says she never saw Brian hurt any of the kids and that they didn't withhold food from their kids as a form of discipline.

The girls may have to testify to get to the truth in the mistreatment trial.

31 posted on 05/01/2002 6:59:27 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: ThreeYearLurker
"n some cases CSD is correct in removing a child from their parents. This is one of those cases."

I'm sorry, but I don't understand how you know this. Do you have some sort of inside information that the rest of us don't enjoy? Are you assuming that the state officials are telling the absolute truth and that these parents are guilty as charged?

The rest of us, even those of us who live in Oregon, pretty well have to rely on what we get from the press and from Ed Steele, both sources with an ax to grind. While I have a little knowledge of how Oregon's Children's Services Agency operates and therefore very little confidence in them, I will admit that they might be right in this case. Still, I don't have any real evidence that I can quote and unless you do, you're as bad as the media twits that you rely on. So please, let us know how you can be so certain of the guilt of these parents.

32 posted on 05/01/2002 7:37:36 PM PDT by oldfart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Poohbah
Sounds like Steele is going to put CPS on trial instead of an actual defense of the Christine's actions. Juries see through this strategy, look at the facts of the case and usually come back in record time with a guilty verdict. If the jury's out two hours, check the time--they've usually taken an hour and a half off for lunch.
33 posted on 05/01/2002 7:41:52 PM PDT by Catspaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
This is the kind of defense that would make the Grants Pass crowd proud.

It's lame enough, but not lunatic enough.

34 posted on 05/01/2002 7:48:37 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich;Demidog
Brian and Ruth Christine's daughters told police that their father hit one of them in the head, causing her to fall down steps in the converted city bus they called home and cut her forehead, spreading "blood all over," a detective testified Wednesday.

Asked why he hadn't taken his daughter Lydia, then 3, to the hospital, Brian Christine "told me he was an Eagle Scout and he knew how to treat an injury," testified Grants Pass police detective Dan Evans.

What do you think, DD?

35 posted on 05/01/2002 7:59:38 PM PDT by Roscoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
Brian Christine countered that he "swatted" Lydia on the back of the head to discipline her for peeing the bed in an act of defiance, and she lost her balance while kneeling on the edge of the bed, falling and hitting her forehead on a step.

What the heck? The kid pees the bed and it's "an act of defiance"? Brian takes a pretty simple thing quite personally and quite badly. He "swats" her head and she hits it on a step but he says it is she who loses her balance?

As any parent can tell Brian, they grow up and get real cases of defiance. Luckily these girls are safely away from this nut for when they hit those years.

36 posted on 05/01/2002 9:12:39 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
If you ever want to put ever parent in jail for hitting their child in anger...

put stars of David on them and round them up--sieg hiel!

37 posted on 05/01/2002 9:18:05 PM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
If you ever want to put ever parent in jail for hitting their child in anger...

Only if they continue to blame the kid for their own bad behavior. Wetting the bed is not an act of defiance. Smacking her around is a proven loser maneuver . He comes to court nearly two years later and tries to place the blame of this child's injury squarely on the shoulders of the child. He shows no remorse and accepts no responsibility for the injury. He has had two years to figure this stuff out and he still doesn't have a clue.

38 posted on 05/01/2002 9:51:25 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Roscoe
I think that Dan Evans is a bald faced liar. I think that he asked leading questions of the girls on the day of the arrest and then claimed that one of Brian's daughters had implicated him. I think that the weights are either fabricated or normal for children that small. If Ruth breastfed and the Christine's were vegetarians, that would account for the low weights of the children. Luckily, all of the evidence will be presented in open court in this trial and I'm glad that the Judge is allowing Steele to go in this direction. He probably did so over the squealing objections of the DA.
39 posted on 05/01/2002 10:21:28 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
"He shows no remorse and accepts no responsibility for the injury. "

It's called "not guilty." If you want to equate a not guilty plea with "accepts no responsibility" that's your call. But not everyone is silly enough to buy it as proof of guilt.

How he handled the situation with his daughter (shit happens sometimes) and how remorseful he was is not a matter for the state. We're talking about a one-time event and there is no evidence presented that this incident caused any serious damage.

40 posted on 05/01/2002 10:24:53 PM PDT by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson