I was thinking that too. The people who pulled out this law to silence the pro-life point of view were true morons by any definition.
Also, notice I called your side pro-life instead of anti-choice, anti-freedom or anti-woman. At least you could use "pro-choice" when referring to the other side. It shows honest intent at discourse rather than name calling.
Oh, did I hurt your feelings? The term "pro-choice" is a deceptive term - what exactly is being chosen, and who is it that is choosing?
Infanticide is the killing of babies, and according to any honest biologist or geneticist a human "fetus" can only BE a human being.
You can use any feel-good term you want, it doesn't change the fact of what an abotion does: it kills a baby human being.
To believe other-wise is strictly denial.
Ah, but the pro-choice position is truly the anti-women position.
The terrible toll that it takes on a womens' spiritual and emotional condition,
not even considering that about half of all abortions end the life of a female.
People who run abortion clinics are not "pro-choice". They make buckets of money off putting dead babies in buckets, and they are no more "pro-choice" about a woman deciding whether or not to abort than GM is "pro-choice" about your decision whether or not to buy a Chevy, or Microsoft is "pro-choice" about your decision to upgrade Office. In all cases, they are "pro" a particular "choice," and only that choice.
That is why, as posted here a few days ago, barely 1% of Planned Parenthood's clients choose adoption.
Hmm. Good point. Let's think of someting upbeat to call your side . . . something with that positive prefix "pro" in front of it.
Something like "pro-death," "pro-slaughter," "pro-vivesection." Choose whichever factual and upbeat term suits your fancy.
You're welcome. Glad to oblige.