Skip to comments.
The Ultimate Response to the "Bush Knew" Smear (RNC please take note)
Source: Me
| 05/17/2001
| By Laz
Posted on 05/17/2002 6:36:15 AM PDT by Lazamataz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 321-322 next last
To: MJY1288
RedDragonRising -- No current freeper by that nameHehehehe.... they shore don't take no guff 'round hyar. :o)
To: Lazamataz; John Huang2
Big BUMP!!
To: ArmyDawg
Sorry friend, that's not gonna cut it.I get it. Bush should know MORE than the actual perpetrators.
He should lose Condi Rice and swap in Miss Cleo.
To: Lazamataz
BUMP!!!
And big congrats on your wedding!!!
To: Ann Archy
"GOOD ONE!!! THIS is gonna bite the Dems and Louis Freeh and Tenet BIG TIME! " saddam offered to turn bin laden over to bush if he'd promise to quit bombing the baby milk factory...
wait til the demonRATs get a hold of that
65
posted on
05/17/2002 7:01:50 AM PDT
by
hoot2
To: ArmyDawg
Well "MEMBER SINCE TODAY" that's quite perceptive of you, Without a credible threat how could anyone know what was going to happen. With that said....
Go back to Dummies Underground
66
posted on
05/17/2002 7:02:29 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Lazamataz
Good post. But you don't even need this to see how ridiculous the RATS pathetic smear campaign is.
I rather see a new Freeper Chant used against the RATS:
No Issues! No Hope!
To: Lazamataz
BTTT
To: Lazamataz
Taking your loginc one sterp further for those who still don't understand...
...If not even the actual perps knew, HOW IS IT THAT ALL THESE DEMOCRAT CONGRESSMEN KNEW AND DIDN'T DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT???
Why didn't the Congresspeople who knew about 9-11 in advance DO SOMETHING MORE after their calls for prevention were allegedly ignored?
Each and every Congressman who whines that HE knew, but nobody in government would listen to him, could have taken the initiative and got the word out to more and more people...that all of those Democrat Congressmen could have been heros who saved THOUSANDS and THOUSANDS of lives on 9-11...
BUT CHOSE NOT TO.
To: Lazamataz
ARMYRAT is next
70
posted on
05/17/2002 7:03:46 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: JessicaDragonet
I'd like to ask miserable hillary WHY her husband did not accept Sudan's offer of turning over bin laden. Period.
If klinton has taken custody of bin laden when ol osama was offered to us on a silver platter, then 9/11's master architect would have been neutered.
This is so crystal clear, so horrendous in its import, I cannot for the life of me even understand how bill klinton can show his ugly mug in public.
His mistake cost THOUSANDS of lives.
DicK Morris reports that he did not want bin laden because of the controversy that would have ensued. Blow me over with a feather!
If anyone, ANYONE, failed in pre Sept 11 protection and action, it was our failed ex=prez, the one and only bill (oh gag me) klinton.
71
posted on
05/17/2002 7:03:54 AM PDT
by
Republic
To: ArmyDawg
BTW, even the National Public Radio had a little more forgiving a take on it than you: They detailed the longtime rift between the CIA and the FBI, and how these tidbits were possessed by various agencies that do not talk to one another since the Church Hearings in the 1970's.
Never look for conspiracy when simple incompetence will explain things. The FBI and the CIA were ORDERED, by Democrats, in the 1970's, to drop this ball.
To: Real Cynic No More
Bumpity bump.
To: Cincinatus' Wife
Thanks for bumping, friend.
To: MJY1288
ArmyDawg -- No current Freeper by that nameBoy, Cynthia's stooges are out in force today...
To: Lazamataz
I've been reminding my husband for two days that OBL bragged on videotape that the terrorists didn't know what their target was, so how was Bush to know? Also, Congress was given the same briefing as Bush received and they did nothing. At least Bush drafted a "war" plan to take OBL out, notified the FAA and moved ships in the mid-East to more strategic positions. Can't someone on this forum get this to the GOP? Their talking points are terrible.
76
posted on
05/17/2002 7:06:22 AM PDT
by
Peach
To: Lazamataz
Yep, and the reason that not all the hijackers knew the nature of the attacks is ue to the fact that it was
unthinkable that hijackers would fly airliners into buildings prior to 9/11.
This is what many have forgotten following their 9/11 epiphany. The world is now a different place, you cannot judge pre-9/11 activities with a post-9/11 mentality.
77
posted on
05/17/2002 7:06:26 AM PDT
by
Jerry_M
To: Lazamataz, Admin Moderator
armydawg "No current Freeper by that name" ROFLMAO
Admin Moderator is on the job this morning :-) THANK YOU
78
posted on
05/17/2002 7:07:25 AM PDT
by
MJY1288
To: Jerry_M
Good point. Succinct, too. Possibly usable as a sound bite on the Sunday Screaming Faces shows.
To: Lazamataz
I wouldn't exactly call this a vanity, Laz. You're merely repeating a know fact. One of the things about 9/11 that amazed investigators was the operational security maintained by Al Qaeda. There was zero communications traffic about the attack. We knew that they were "up to something"; but then again, they were always "up to something"! If there is blame anywhere within the government, it lies with the Clintonistas. Had they accepted the Somalies offer to hand over bin Laden, 9/11 might not have occured.
80
posted on
05/17/2002 7:10:29 AM PDT
by
Redcloak
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-60, 61-80, 81-100 ... 321-322 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson