Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress Threatens To Leave D.C. Unless New Capitol Is Built
The Onion ^ | 05/29/02

Posted on 05/29/2002 6:05:19 AM PDT by Phantom Lord

Mobile/PDA | Books | Onion Merchandise & Subscriptions | National Distribution Personals | Media Kit | Employment | Copyright

Back Arrow The Onion 29 May 2002  

Congress Threatens To Leave D.C. Unless New Capitol Is Built

      WASHINGTON, DC—Calling the current U.S. Capitol "inadequate and obsolete," Congress will relocate to Charlotte or Memphis if its demands for a new, state-of-the-art facility are not met, leaders announced Monday.

 
Above: An architectural firm's proposal for a new retractable-dome capitol. Inset: Hastert addresses reporters.

      "Don't get us wrong: We love the drafty old building," Speaker of the House Dennis Hastert (R-IL) said. "But the hard reality is, it's no longer suitable for a world-class legislative branch. The sight lines are bad, there aren't enough concession stands or bathrooms, and the parking is miserable. It hurts to say, but the capitol's time has come and gone."

      "If we want to stay competitive, we need to upgrade," said House Majority Leader Dick Gephardt (D-MO), who has proposed a new $3.5 billion capitol on the site of the current edifice. "Look at British Parliament. Look at the Vatican. Respected institutions in their markets. But without modern facilities, they've been having big problems attracting top talent."

      Its cornerstone laid in 1793 by President Washington, the capitol has been built, rebuilt, extended, and restored countless times over the past 209 years. Legislators say another multimillion-dollar renovation is not an acceptable alternative to a new building.

      "How many times can you put a fresh coat of paint over an old, broken-down horse?" asked Sen. Rick Santorum (R-PA), co-chair of the Senate Relocation Subcommittee. "We need a building that befits our status as the nation's number-one democratically elected legislative body. And if D.C. isn't willing to provide that, I can think of plenty of other cities that would be more than happy to."

      The leading candidates for a possible congressional relocation are Charlotte and Memphis, both of which have long sought a major organization to raise their national profile. San Francisco civic leaders have also lobbied hard, offering to finance a $4 billion Pac Bell Capitol Building using a combination of private corporate funds (40 percent), a county sales tax (35 percent), and a local cigarette tax (25 percent). Dallas, Seattle, and Toronto have also been mentioned as long shots.

      Demonstrating its commitment to "stay in Washington if at all possible," Congress has invited more than a dozen architectural firms to submit proposals for a new D.C. capitol. Among the early favorites is the ambitiously titled "Halls Of Power," a retro-futuristic design by the Kansas City architectural firm of Hellmuth, Obata, and Kassabaum. The Halls Of Power would feature a retractable rotunda for daytime sessions, a Dancing Waters fountain in the front courtyard, and 55 more luxury boxes than the current building.

      "This is just the kind of thing we need to stay competitive in today's lawmaking environment," said agent Barry Halperin, who represents many prominent government officials, including Sen. Jim Jeffords (I-VT) and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. "Washington can no longer afford to ignore the fact that visitor attendance has dropped every year since 1989. Our elected officials don't like coming to this building and, clearly, neither do their constituents."

      Experts attribute the decline in congressional attendance to a number of factors, including increased home viewership of legislative activities on C-SPAN, with which Congress signed an exclusive 20-year, $360 million broadcast pact in 1984. It is not known how a new capitol building would affect the terms of that soon-to-expire contract, but Congress is expected to restructure the deal to increase its share of revenues and secure possible advertising rights, regardless of whether it opts for rebuilding or relocation.

      According to the lawmakers' constituents, the capitol is not the problem.

      "Sure, the capitol's a little beat-up, but it's got its charms," said Geoff Lapointe, a Glendale, CA, voter. "The real problem is the legislators. Back in the old days, you had big stars like John Kennedy and Richard Nixon. Who've they got today? Evan Bayh? Paul Sarbanes? Who's gonna get excited about those guys?"

      Lapointe said he is "fed up" with the legislators and their demands.

      "Those guys are all just a bunch of spoiled, overpaid crybabies," Lapointe said. "All they want is money—they don't care about all the hardworking people who pay their salaries. Look at 'em: When's the last time you saw them acting like a team? They can take their capitol and shove it."



 


© Copyright 2002 Onion, Inc., All rights reserved. http://www.theonion.com/

Back Arrow The Onion 29 May 2002 Media Kit | Employment | Copyright
© Copyright 2002 Onion, Inc., All rights reserved. Masthead | Contact Information | Privacy Policy



TOPICS: Government; Miscellaneous; Political Humor/Cartoons
KEYWORDS: dome; humor; newcapital; parody; taxpayers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: 2grit; Abe Froman; Abigail Adams; AdGal; Aeronaut; Alpenkatze; Andrew Lanz; antidisestablishment...
Twins/Vikings BUMP.
41 posted on 05/30/2002 2:11:24 PM PDT by sheltonmac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Let the Twins and Vikings leave, the people of Minnesota don't want another stadium built.
42 posted on 05/30/2002 3:21:21 PM PDT by Sawdring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Don't let Ventura see this, I'm not sure he can tell it's just a joke....
43 posted on 05/30/2002 3:35:00 PM PDT by Big Dan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
Vikings/Twins bump.

I hate to ruin the MN fellowship on this thread, but I'm a Packers' fan. ;>( Nonetheless, the posturing by politicians and the operators of Professional sports leagues - to disband the Twins franchise or move the Vikings to LA - is an insult to the folks up here. They know it, and they're telling the fat cats and bullying pols to "stick it".

Stadiums are boondoggles, and increasingly taxpayers are rejecting their forced involvement in the funding. Even if I pay a levy to build a new Twins park or Vikings stadium - just because I'm a resident of Hennepin County - I still can't get in unless I have a ticket. The Packers went to the taxpayers and received $250 million to renovate Lambeau Field. Even in that one-horse town, the special tax referendum only received 56% support of Brown County voters. Folks know they are getting jobbed - most Brown County residents will never have the opportunity to see a game in the new Lambeau Field they are funding.

Minneapolis has too many large-money ticket entertainment options right now. It has the equivalent of 7 major league (as far as ticket pricing) teams ... the Twins, Vikings, Wolves, Wild, and the Gopher football, basketball and hockey clubs. It has the Guthrie, Ordway and Orpheum theatres. It has the MN Zoo, Valleyfair, Canterbury Downs racetrack, Indian Casinos, myriad golf courses, a behemoth State Fair and countless festivals. That's too many venues chasing too few dollars. Add in the costs associated with recreational snowmobiling, fishing and boating, and the supply - especially lousy supply (i.e. Gopher football) - will far exceed demand.

Miller Park in Milwaukee is facing the largest decrease in attendance in the year following the opening of a new stadium this year ... they are on pace to be nearly 1,000,000 fans short of the 2.9 million they drew last year. The Brewers stink, and people will visit a stadium once to check it out, but it's the team that puts "asses in seats". A new stadium isn't a panacea to solve baseball's ills. The Yankees have a $120 million payroll, the Twins are at $35 million. The Yankees have been in 5 of the last 6 World Series'. The Twins teams that won Championships in 87 and 91 could never keep that nucleus of Hrbek, Harper, Puckett, Gaetti, Knoblauch, Mack, Bush and Gagne together for 7 years in today's baseball economic climate.

Stadiums are boondoggles. Unlike roads, courts, police, fire, libraries etc., they can't be used equally by all the taxpaying citizens. If a new stadium is a good buisiness investment, a vital business investment, for the owners of pro sports franchises ... they can raise capital the same way every other business does when investments in critical plant and equipment expansions are warranted - stock and bond sales, debt instruments etc. It's not a good private investment. It's a scam.

44 posted on 05/30/2002 5:29:23 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Here are four of my Onion favorites:

For the Bill Gates "fans" on FR

This one is painfully true

Subject of much Freeper angst

FR Libertarians are right!

45 posted on 05/30/2002 5:57:06 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: KC_Conspirator
Last month's Spectator ran an Onion piece on its last page. They received response from a LOT of folks who didn't recognize the source or get the humor of the parody. This month's issue contained a helpful explanation that the item featured on its last page was not satire. There are people who are in a poised reactionary crouch - ready willin' and able to be offended - 24X7.
46 posted on 05/30/2002 6:04:17 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: All

On NOW at RadioFR!

6pm PDT/9pm EDT- Listen to Radio FreeRepublic live tonight, as Luis Gonzales interviews G. Edward Griffin and discusses his book 'The Creature From Jekyll Island. A Second Look At The Federal Reserve'. Find out the true nature of our monetary system and how it affects you!

Click HERE to listen LIVE while you FReep!


47 posted on 05/30/2002 6:05:58 PM PDT by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
"Look at British Parliament. Look at the Vatican. Respected institutions in their markets. But without modern facilities, they've been having big problems attracting top talent."

(Slapping forehead) I get it! No wonder we have such a bunch of panty waists, bleeding heart cry babys, and misfits who couldn't get any decent job! New facilities are whats needed. Fancy bathrooms and concession stands and viola, a Congress worthy of respect. That seems reasonable to me!

OTOH, screw em. Let them move to BFE for all I care. Come to think of it, quite a few (Bawney comes to mind) would be right at home in BFE.

LMAO. Thanks. Onion!

48 posted on 05/30/2002 6:18:00 PM PDT by Don Carlos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
I like Luis' guest's proposal that our paper monetary supply be directly linked to a standard based on arcane calculations somehow involving Mr. T.

I've heard the arguments suggesting the fraud of Paper currency, but have you ever been in a bar and tried to play "Liar's Poker" with South African Krugerrands? I rest my case.

49 posted on 05/30/2002 6:40:31 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Arne, I truly believed this until someone pointed out the source. I believed it because it is exactly something Congress would do. I was really getting angry and totally fed up. Hehehe. OTOH, I thought Memphis would serve them right.
50 posted on 05/30/2002 6:48:16 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: WVNan
Nan, the sad truth is that the reality in our social and political envronment is becoming so bizarre that outfits like The Onion are having a harder time constructing parodies that are outrageously beyond belief.
51 posted on 05/30/2002 7:54:50 PM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Big Dan
You mean it's a joke? :-) Uff Da
52 posted on 05/30/2002 8:53:05 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Sawdring
I hereby give BOTH the Twins and Vikes my personal premission to build whatever kind of stadium they want, with their own money.
53 posted on 05/30/2002 8:57:47 PM PDT by Valin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
You got that right Arne. Some days I just shake my head. Nothing really surprises me any more.
54 posted on 05/30/2002 10:06:17 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
Football,baseball and hockey ended when the tore down the Met complex.....I've never gotten into FB and BB again,we used to drive 500 miles round trip for Vikes home games,we had season tickets....I'm coming back to hockey though,but have yet to visit the new digs,soon though,soon. I can't stand the "modern" Vikes,and I don't think Bud does either....I got a chance to ride snowmobile with him a few years back(along with Vern Gagne,Sen. Bob Lassard and Dean Barkley) we were having to much fun to talk aboot rasslin,football or politics....I got my hellmutt signed by them all,and I put it away for good!

got long winded there,basically what I wanted to say was the Twins and Vikes can go as far as I'm concerned,watching pee-wee or high school games are much more fun anyways.

The Onion writer has spoofed this perfectly,politics and professional sports,perfect combo!

55 posted on 05/31/2002 6:11:19 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: ArneFufkin
ps: I'm suprised the Indians haven't stepped up to the stadium plate....bet they could build one with cash,right next to one of their casinos.....
56 posted on 05/31/2002 6:15:36 AM PDT by Minnesoootan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
I hear Bawney Fwank is panting, make that lobbying, heavily for San Francisco.
57 posted on 05/31/2002 6:15:49 AM PDT by wattsmag2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Minnesoootan
I walked up to "Sharon and Jackie" during Aquatennial Days last year and told them that Minneapolis could retire all it's debt, build three new stadiums and give their oppressed citizens a tax break if they would use that Block E property they seized ... oh ... 16 years ago and built a Vegas-class Casino on the vacant hole. They could operate it, VISITORS would REALLY leave their bankroll in town, and it would be 100% voluntary "contributions". Too damned easy. They blew me off - "we're not in the addiction business" Jackie C informed me. They've got seven strip joints down there, I guess a Casino might bring in the "wrong element". I told them they were hopeless and I was quite happy I moved from their diseased little fiefdom. These creeps are all on the grease of the Prior Lake tribe - they throw money around like rice at a wedding. It's ridiculous. 1 am bar times, the Convention Center was built to attract big events, yet it's a 6 block walk from the Center to the Warehouse District, hotels, restaurants and strip joints. They are arrogant (and corrupt) incompetents running the show down there.

A casino would solve ALL Minneapolis financial woes. They are that profitable.

58 posted on 05/31/2002 6:52:33 AM PDT by ArneFufkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: sheltonmac
heh heh!
59 posted on 05/31/2002 6:59:46 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Cyrano
PING! heh heh.
60 posted on 05/31/2002 7:00:15 AM PDT by Terriergal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson