Posted on 05/30/2002 4:25:59 PM PDT by Pokey78
I care about the killing of millions of people anywhere it occurs. It concerns me even more that there is a finite chance that they could take us with them.
City Populations: New Delhi - 11,680,000 (2000 estimate, Source: United Nations Population Division, 1996) Islamabad: 5,800,000 (source unknown).
This would indeed be ugly. I'm surprised the numbers aren't much higher.
I think most of this article was pretty accurate, but I don't think that statement is correct, unless it's referring to a pretty small minority. Musharraf had nowhere near the 96% (or whatever it was) vote claimed in the election, but every indication I've seen shows that he's still popular, editorials by former PM Benazir Bhutto notwithstanding.
But, this is also an article which implies that if Jack Straw can't solve the problem, it can't be solved and nuclear war can happen any second.
Let's set the record straight. Jack Straw is an idiot, and he's a British idiot trying to intervene in a country that just threw the British out 50 years ago.
Let's wait until Boucher and Rumsfeld visit there before tossing in the towel and heading for the fallout shelters.
So that means we need to have fallout shelters available next week. Where are we supposed to get them?
Yeah, what the heck is up with that? How is it that China claimed something that was a dispute between India and Pakistan, and nobody really cares?
Is it basically uninhabited but useful as a defensive boundary for China?
Conflict Spirals As Pakistan Begins Troop Reinforcment
AFP | 05/31/02
Posted on 5/30/02 5:12 PM Pacific by Davea
Friday May 31, 3:03 AM
Conflict spirals as Pakistan begins troop reinforcement
AFP
Conflict escalated sharply along the Indian-Pakistani border with Islamabad bolstering its military presence as the US said it would send a top level diplomatic mission.
The Indian army reported the heaviest shelling since relations between the hostile neighbours plummeted two weeks ago following a massacre in Kashmir India blames on Pakistan.
US President George W. Bush said he was dispatching Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld to India and Pakistan "early next week" in a bid to defuse the situation.
"Yes he's going there. Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage is going this week and then Secretary Rumsfeld is going ... next week, yeah, early next week," Bush told reporters.
But tensions between the nuclear-armed rivals continued to mount Thursday with Pakistan redeploying troops from its western border with Afghanistan to the eastern flank with India.
Pakistan's military said in a statement read out on state television that the redeployment from the Afghan frontier was made "in view of the adverse posture of the Indian armed forces".
An Indian army spokesman said India was aware of the troop movements amid US warnings that "irresponsible elements" in the two nuclear-armed countries could spark a war.
"We are in full knowledge of the situation and Pakistani troop and tank mobilisation," spokesman Colonel Sruti Kant told AFP. "We are in complete control of the situation."
Kant said India had information that the Pakistani troops were being moved to areas flanking India's western border states of Rajasthan and Punjab, the theatre of previous wars between the two arch-rivals.
Musharraf said war between India and Pakistan would only break out if India initiates the conflict.
"We will try to avoid a conflict. Conflict will only take place if it is initiated by India," he said at a press conference.
Earlier in the day, Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee called an unscheduled meeting with his three key advisers on security matters -- Defence Minister George Fernandes, Foreign Minister Jaswant Singh and Home Minister Lal Krishna Advani.
Singh afterwards said "various issues" had been discussed, without elaborating, although the chiefs of the Indian army, navy and air force did not attend.
Fernandes later said Musharraf has told British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw that he would end support to Kashmiri Islamic separatists.
"The stated intention of Musharraf is that within a certain period cross-border terrorism will come to an end," the defence minister said, citing Straw's talks on Wednesday with Indian Prime Minister Atal Behari Vajpayee in New Delhi.
"But the point is how does one believe it? Cross-border terrorism is at the hands of Pakistan army, backed by the ISI and other such elements," he said of Pakistan's military intelligence which India blames for all its troubles in turbulent Kashmir.
Fernandes was to late Thursday leave for Singapore where he would attend a regional security conference that would enable India to brief world leaders on its stance with Pakistan, the defence ministry said.
A defence spokesman in Jammu, southern Kashmir, said heavy shelling, mortar and gunfire had raged across the Indian-Pakistani borders overnight into Thursday.
At least seven people were killed in a fierce artillery duel in Poonch district that continued deep into the night, Indian police said.
Tension was raised even higher when, according to police, two Muslim rebels attacked a police post at Doda, 172 kilometers (106 miles) north of Kashmir's winter capital Jammu, late Wednesday and killed three policemen on duty.
Another five police were wounded after the militants hid inside a two-storey building with 250 rooms and exchanged fire with Indian soldiers, a police spokesman said.
The guerrillas were finally shot dead Thursday afternoon by soldiers and paramilitaries, the spokesman said.
Actually there is info here:
Nuclear, Biological, & Chemical Warfare- Survival Skills, Pt. II
Look for the links to "Nuclear War Survival Skills" by Cresson H. Kearney, available online or hard copy.
FWIW, I don't think we'd get a *lot* of fallout, depending on airbursts vs. surface bursts, and the "dirtiness" of the warheads- but we'd get some. There are maps showing fallout from a 1958 Chinese 300 kiloton test here:
The India-Pakistani Conflict... some background information- |
Chinese Kashmir was the part of Kashmir the Pakistanis had taken right before the Maharaja signed the Instrument of Accession to join India back in '47. The Pakistanis awarded that piece of Kashmir to the Chinese later, as a gesture of friendship. India doesn't care because they don't want to take on China yet. They need to fry the smaller fish in their neighborhood first.
You may remember the much derided reports of Chinese troop movements in that area last fall. Probably not the numbers reported by D****, but possibly a move by China to stop Jihadis fleeing Northern Afghanistan/Kashmir entering China if the US had taken a whoopa** strategy to the region.
Recently, pakistani papers reported that a Uighur Leader, fighting with the Taliban, had been turned over to the Chinese by the Pakistanis.
Dog_Gone, i think China took over that part, called Aksai Chin when it invaded and occupied Tibet in 1959.
I think you are right. Serbian nationalist terrorists killed an Austrian leader. (Bosnia was part of the Austro-Hungarian Empire, and Serbia claimed it). Austria demanded that Serbia make concessions, and Serbia refused. Austria and Serbia started shooting, then the system of alliances committed all of Europe to the fight. There are no alliances involved here, but it is a regional dispute that could get totally out of hand.
Same as always: "We SURENDER!"
I have noticed that the UN is very quiet, in their caves, about this. As a matter of fact, I see only one nation trying to drench the fire....that would be the good old United States of America. Big surprize, huh? The UN is worthless!
The only bright spot here is, if India does go to launch mode many rag heads of Al Quaida (sp) will be chimney soot as well. India has many more warheads than do the Pakistanis.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.