Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A house divided, land speculator seeks his profit
St. Petersburg Times ^ | June 1, 2002 | JEFF TESTERMAN

Posted on 06/01/2002 8:01:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

TAMPA -- Land speculator Don Connolly showed up on Luella Williams' doorstep in February and announced that he had bought half her Tampa Heights house.

"I thought he was crazy," said Williams, 43, a medical billing specialist. "I've had this house for nine years."


[Times photo: Thomas M. Goethe]

But Connolly was telling the truth. Capitalizing on an oversight made years ago, he had bought for $2,400 the tax deed to the north half of Williams' lot at 2510 N Ola Ave. The property line almost perfectly bisected Williams' 1,528-square-foot home.

Williams' living room, dining room, kitchen, utility area and front porch were on Connolly's land. The three bedrooms, two baths and flower garden were on her half.

For Williams, the news soon got worse.

Connolly sued her, asking a judge to order the home, valued at about $63,000, be sold. He said the proceeds of the sale should be split between him and Williams and any party with a mortgage on the property.

Williams went to officials at the city of Tampa, which had helped her buy the home. Her conclusion: "I'm sure we're going to have to take care of this in court."

City officials wrote Connolly and even sought an asking price, but Connolly never replied.

"To gain from someone's misfortune like this, that's just not right," City Attorney Jim Palermo said. "But is it illegal? I'm not equipped to say."

Connolly is the Valrico entrepreneur who has angered homeowners with his business strategy of buying tax deeds and using intimidation to force adjacent landowners to pay top dollar for his new properties. His first deal to come to light was in North Pinellas, where he bought the tax deed for a small lake and put up a fence on the shoreline to try to get $30,000 apiece from owners whose homes suddenly weren't waterfront.

Luella Williams bought her house in 1993 through a city program for low-income people. The deal was arranged by the city and one of its nonprofit housing partners, the Tampa United Methodist Centers.

A survey Williams received at the time of purchase shows she was supposed to have bought all of lot No. 1 on her block on N Ola Avenue. But years earlier, the lot had been subdivided into two parcels. Apparently unwittingly, the Methodist Centers conveyed only the south half of the lot to Williams at closing.

Aggravating the error was that the concrete home on the lot had been moved there from the route of the Veterans Expressway, and plopped down almost precisely in the middle of lot No. 1. The boundary between the north parcel and south parcel invisibly divided the house in half.

For years, no one noticed.

Allstate Title Co, which performed the title search on the land, did not catch the error. (The company has since gone out of business, city officials said.)

Williams filed for her homestead exemption and began paying her taxes. The Hillsborough property appraiser saw that Williams owned only half of the lot, but assumed the house was on that half. The appraiser placed 100 percent of the house's assessment on the southern parcel owned by Williams.

Meanwhile, tax bills for the northern parcel kept going to the Methodist Centers. For some reason, the nonprofit agency ignored them. The unpaid tax bills piled up from 1994 to 2001.

Then along came Connolly.

On Feb. 18, Connolly, as trustee for his Connolly Family Land Trust, handed the clerk of the court a certified check for $2,400 for the back taxes and interest owed on the parcel.

Then, he filed his lawsuit. The suit seeks to assert his title to the land, claiming that mortgage liens from the city of Tampa and a commercial bank to Williams are no longer valid.

Connolly also asked that the house be partitioned, or divided in half. If it could not be partitioned to the satisfaction of all, he said, then the court should order the sale of the property, "equally dividing the proceeds between the plaintiff and defendants."

The city, which made a $20,000 loan with payment deferred until the home is sold, responds in court papers that Connolly's tax deed does not invalidate their lien on Williams' property. State law says a municipal government's lien survives the purchase of a tax deed.

The case remains pending in Hillsborough Circuit Court.

Neither Connolly nor the Tampa United Methodist Centers returned calls from the St. Petersburg Times.

Will Shepherd, general counsel for the Hillsborough Property Appraiser's Office, said the law might not allow Connolly to claim half of Williams' house, even if he does have a deed to the dirt beneath it.

"It might be looked at like a condominium: You own your unit, even though you don't own the land under the condominium," Shepherd said. "In my opinion, he's not entitled to any part of the house.

"Of course, my opinions don't always agree with those handed down by the court."

-- Jeff Testerman can be reached at (813) 226-3422, or at testerman@sptimes.com. Times researcher John Martin contributed to this report.

Related Connolly Story Speculator turns landlocked land into gold mine


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; US: Florida
KEYWORDS: barracuda; propertytaxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
More Connolly:

View for sale: $30,000 New owner of a lake fences it off when homeowners wouldn't pay.

Who has rights to submerged lands?

1 posted on 06/01/2002 8:01:52 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
"But is it illegal? I'm not equipped to say."

Equipped?

2 posted on 06/01/2002 8:04:14 AM PDT by lepton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Before all this is over, somebody's gonna hire Tony Soprano to "do the right thing" with Mr. Connelly.
3 posted on 06/01/2002 8:06:11 AM PDT by Real Cynic No More
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
You have to admit the pink paint and sparkles were a nice touch on the lake fence.

Solution: no property tax.

4 posted on 06/01/2002 8:18:48 AM PDT by Tauzero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Real Cynic No More
The 'right thing' to do is abide by the law. Somebody screwed up. Stuff happens. Fix it. Actions and reactions based upon emotion lead to anarchy.
5 posted on 06/01/2002 8:23:52 AM PDT by Buffalo Head
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Here's another story about his shenanigans in this mornings St. Pete Times:

LINK

6 posted on 06/01/2002 8:25:08 AM PDT by dawn53
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I think she could claim rights to it by adverse possession. She's actually been using it. It would be worth a try. The taxpayers will buy this guy off for her though in the end.
7 posted on 06/01/2002 8:32:09 AM PDT by holyscroller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tauzero
Solution: no property tax.

You're right. Both in this instance and in the Pink Fence story there is no one to blame except the state. The original homeowners did nothing wrong. The land speculator was simply following rules set out by the law. (Yes, some people think he's an anal sphincter, but he's still following the lead of the state.)

The root of the problem is a legal system that creates these situations to begin with.

8 posted on 06/01/2002 8:34:19 AM PDT by gitmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Luella Williams bought her house in 1993 through a city program for low-income people. The deal was arranged by the city and one of its nonprofit housing partners, the Tampa United Methodist Centers.

When you hear… Hi, we're from the government, and we are here to help, grab your wallet and run, do not walk to your nearest exit.
This kind of nonsense will be typical under Bush's faith based initiatives.

9 posted on 06/01/2002 8:42:14 AM PDT by TightSqueeze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
les 'member folks: this guy's only pursuing the American way of free enterprise-gotta respect his moxie here and at the pink fence site.
10 posted on 06/01/2002 8:49:49 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1234
this guy's only pursuing the American way of free enterprise-gotta respect his moxie here and at the pink fence site.

No, I don't. This shady character is the real-estate equivalent to the ambulance-chasing attorney. Wait a minute, he probably is a lawyer. He definetly is a rip-off artist.

11 posted on 06/01/2002 9:02:18 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
The Hillsborough property appraiser saw that Williams owned only half of the lot, but assumed the house was on that half. The appraiser placed 100 percent of the house's assessment on the southern parcel owned by Williams.

Williams may have a case for a lawsuit against Connelly. She has been paying Connelly's share of the property taxes on the house for all these years.

12 posted on 06/01/2002 9:05:15 AM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimtorr
...This shady character is the real-estate equivalent to the ambulance-chasing attorney.

my word choice of 'respect' was poor. not only did i mean some awe at his boldness, but also more importantly: BUYER BEWARE in the real estate world, among others in the "land of the free".

13 posted on 06/01/2002 9:21:53 AM PDT by 1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Wouldn't this fall under squatter's rights provisions?
14 posted on 06/01/2002 10:51:24 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: holyscroller
I believe that you are right. My neighbor had built his fence about 18" inside his property and when a new buyer came along they surveyed the lot lines and discovered the problem. The new buyer insisted the fence be moved but it had been there longer that 7 years and that part of his lot was now mine.
15 posted on 06/01/2002 11:45:42 AM PDT by 1FreeAmerican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: 1234
my word choice of 'respect' was poor. not only did i mean some awe at his boldness, but also more importantly: BUYER BEWARE in the real estate world, among others in the "land of the free".

When you put it that way, I must agree. I am in awe of his nerve.

The sad part is that it's actually pretty easy to do this sort of thing. Tax sales and foreclosures and the like are published in really obscure business journals. Sometimes the publisher is located far away from the property's location. There is no requirement, usually, to publish in a local journal.

I recall a case in Central California where a homeowners association wanted to get rid of someone, for the stated reason that he didn't fit in with the rest of the owners (it was a social class thing, old money vs. new money).

They voted in a new fee, and didn't tell the guy about it. After the fee was six months overdue, they published a foreclosure notice in a business journal in a small town in Northern California, over 100 miles away.

The president of the the homeowners association bought the poor guy's million dollar house for only $1500. There was nothing he could do about it except talk to the media and sully everybodies ruputations.

16 posted on 06/01/2002 2:07:01 PM PDT by jimtorr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife
I had not heard about this one. More of this craziness goes on than anyone realizes.
17 posted on 06/01/2002 6:04:46 PM PDT by AuntB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #18 Removed by Moderator

To: one_particular_harbour
mail up!
19 posted on 06/01/2002 8:42:05 PM PDT by IRtorqued
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: one_particular_harbour
Some people just need killing.
20 posted on 06/02/2002 3:30:31 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson