Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Hi, My Name Isn't Justice, Honey,' and Shame on Lockyer
Cato Institute ^ | 6/6/02 | Tom G. Palmer

Posted on 06/13/2002 5:27:08 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla

Originally published in the L.A. Times on June 6 under the title 'Hi, My Name Isn't Justice, Honey,' and Shame on Lockyer , it can now be found at Cato at the link above. Please see that for the whole editorial.

It short it informs us what Bill Lockyer thinks is now suitable punishment for those cases he deems special. Apparently, from his elective position of demigod, in the penal institutions of his state, inmate rapes are now semi-official policy.

There are two lines in particular that I have chosen to focus upon, to provide for FReeper consideration and to make my own observations.

They are



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Editorial; Government; US: California
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last
I emphasised the two lines above to highlight the point I wish to make, which are aside and in addition to the many points made by Mr. Palmer.

This particularly sad pol has been left unmolested for other widely ridiculed divulgence of his thoughts (ranging from the merely stupid to the racist that I invite others to recount in this thread to help make my point).
Perhaps his merely being criticized by "partisans" may have served notice to him that he has some kind of free pass.
In that alone is an ominous threat that is dangerous to ignore.

But of more importance is that there must be quite a bit of acceptance by the public for the meting out of punishment in this manner. Forget both the moral and Constitutional merits of the concept that the punishment must fit the crime.

Aside from the most unrefined Paleos amongst us, how many FReepers figure that, on balance, it all works out in the end? That's not something we should be concerned with is it? After all, isn't that why we hire and elect professionals? Right? </sarcasm>

Seeing how little effort is being waged by the California GOP or even in this forum, I figure there must be more than a few. See my profile for a reminder of what incrementally growing to accept such behavior will assuredly do to our republic as was done to the Roman.
Wants troubling to me, and I hope to you, is that Bill Lockyer may be only the beginning of the types which may follow to afflict our children. Yes, I suspect he's just the tip of the iceberg.

Ya know? I think we should look at Mr. Lockyer as a gift!

"What is wrong with you Av? A gift? Have you flipped?"

No, not at all. Here we have but one thug, who, having been let into power, is so arrogant or stupid that he is willing to blow his cover. He openly reveals to us how he and his cronies really think. He makes it mandatory for us to consider: how many more, being still sane or cagey, remain hidden? How can the lack of public criticism of such a buffoon, a man in charge of "Justice" in the any state of our union, not just its largest, not be greatly worrying? Are all these others who remain silent afraid "to cast the first stone?" Maybe that's because they are not "without sin" of the same kind. I'm torn over what is more troubling: the silence itself or Lockyer's still being in office.

This guy's antics need wider publicity than they are getting. I would hope publishing this on FR might help. Democrats deserve to be made uncomfortable by their silence here. Lockyer almost makes Doofus look good in comparison. Is that why they're silent? Lockyer needs to be reprimanded and shunned by his own party. There was time when that was the norm. So FReepers, be very scornful that it is the norm no longer.

I hate to answer this thread's question with another question, but isn't it obvious?:


1 posted on 06/13/2002 5:27:08 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; headsonpikes; d14truth; Lucius Cornelius Sulla
Please ping those who would think wish to be made aware of this.
2 posted on 06/13/2002 5:28:28 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all
Please excuse this short interruption. As you know, the fundraiser is in full swing. We need your help. Please stop by the fundraising thread and give it a bump. And if you have a few bucks, we'd really appreciate a contribution to keep this site running. IMO, it's the best site on the internet for news and analysis.
Donate Here By Secure Server
Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794
or you can use PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Thank you for your support!
3 posted on 06/13/2002 5:34:57 PM PDT by WIMom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan; headsonpikes; d14truth; Lucius Cornelius Sulla
arrgh!!!

those who would = those [whom you] would.

4 posted on 06/13/2002 5:41:47 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
It will only get worse unless we stop it. Rove has sold out the Party because he is too stupid to know how to show traditional Slave Party voters how conservative principles serve their interests. Gerry Parsky will do Rove's bidding and thus tie Bill Simon's hands (in part because of a spat over money with Simon's father). It is up to us to get Simon elected or it won't happen.
5 posted on 06/13/2002 5:42:12 PM PDT by Carry_Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Lest we forget.

Two weeks ago California Attorney General Bill Lockyer stood in front of a table for a photo opportunity with the press. On the table were various "illegal" firearms that he claimed were sold to California undercover agents at the Pomona gun show held the first weekend in May.

As you may recall, Lockyer was pointing out that gun shows are havens for illegal gun sales. So much so, his agents ran out of money early the first day implying they could have purchased illegal firearms all day long.

Highly placed sources close to the investigation within the Department of Justice have revealed a very disturbing story of deceit perpetrated on the public for the purpose of furthering gun control efforts. The agents involved in the sting operation at the Pomona gun show were from the Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement Division of the California Department of Justice. Agents from the DOJ's Firearms Division were not used in the operation. BNE agents are not trained in weapons identification nor are they familiar to any great degree with federal or California gun laws. Why members of the BNE were used is not certain, but we will speculate that to obtain a "bust", the last thing Lockyer wanted were firearms experts who are looking for illegal firearms. The experts would have probably gone home empty handed. However, the BNE agents didn't go home empty handed from the Pomona show.

Unfortunately, it is beginning to appear as though they used taxpayer money, arrested dealer(s) and held a press conference to announce the purchase of illegal firearms that are perfectly legal.

Sources say the weapons Lockyer displayed for the press were, in at least some cases, not the weapons procured by undercover agents at the show. In fact, the MP-5 subgun on the table belongs to a Bureau of Narcotics Enforcement agent!

The Colt Sporter displayed is a legal firearm in California along with a number of other firearms that are legal under the 1989 Roberti-Roos Assault Weapon law. The so-called "auto-kits" are perfectly legal for sale and possession in California providing they aren't installed in the receiver of a firearm. The flame thrower is also legal providing the igniter is removed/demilled to prevent ignition. The empty LAW rocket launcher tube (no rocket in place) is not a controlled item, illegal, nor is it even considered to be a firearm.

6 posted on 06/13/2002 5:45:13 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Wants troubling to me, and I hope to you ????

"Is there a bottom"...Prison Rape...is this a Homosexual agenda bump???

7 posted on 06/13/2002 5:45:38 PM PDT by evolved_rage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: evolved_rage
What's troubling to me, and I hope to you...
8 posted on 06/13/2002 5:56:20 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach;madfly
fyi
9 posted on 06/13/2002 5:58:32 PM PDT by Libertarianize the GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Why should anyone be surprised by anything the political thugs who run the Socialist Republic of California say?

The people there seem to like being ruled by incompetent idiots, they caused their own electrical shortage problems and this blaming of Enron is the kind of spiel that the shmoos in California will eat up.

Ronald Reagan, even today, could do a better job of running that state than the Commie Crew currently in power. I would like to see these politicians meet Spike, they are the real criminals in this story.

10 posted on 06/13/2002 6:14:15 PM PDT by Colombia59
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Lockyer sucks big time. So did Lundgren. Lundgren was an authoritarian pig, and maybe Lockyer learned his chops from Lundgren. It doesn't matter, they are both pigs.

As for inmate rape, it is an abomination. The state has an obligation to protect inmates from crimes inside the prison. I am surprised that there has not been a multi trillion dollar lawsuit against the state over inmate rape and other crimes.

11 posted on 06/13/2002 6:29:41 PM PDT by monkeyshine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: monkeyshine
Lundgren was an authoritarian pig

So what was so bad about Lundgren? Did he make your expenses for drug purchasing go up too much, or do you have some other complaint against him comparable to those against Lockyear? He was certainly a lousy candidate for governor, but it sounds like more than that sort of objection, seeing your language. I do remember that he was considered as a candidate for VP, back when Quayle was picked, on the grounds that the GOP rarely won the presidency without a Californian on the ticket, and Wilson wouldn't be acceptable.

12 posted on 06/13/2002 7:28:12 PM PDT by Lucius Cornelius Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

SUPPORT FREE REPUBLIC

Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

Thank you Registered!

13 posted on 06/13/2002 7:28:44 PM PDT by Mo1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
Question: "Is there a bottom to the depravity of California's Atty General?"

Answer: No.

14 posted on 06/13/2002 7:34:13 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS; Lucius Cornelius Sulla
From the original article:

So apparently singling out a man for a heinous threat is OK because he's the chairman of the world's largest energy trading company. That's according to the man who, as a state senator, sponsored California's 1984 hate-crimes law. Evidently the crusader against intimidation on the basis of race, religion and sexual orientation feels no hesitation at all about intimidating someone and threatening him with the brutal use of physical force simply because he heads the world's largest energy trading company...

An Enron spokesman said that Lockyer's chilling stated desire to arrange the rape of Lay does not merit a response. The spokesman is wrong. Lockyer's remarks merit public disgrace and removal from office. After all, rape is not a form of legal justice in America-- is it?


Dan Lundgren was merely incompetent, but I fear for what remains of my adopted state (I've been a Californian since 1994) that it could have elected this filth to office. If California Republicans have anything left of the brains they were born with, they will hammer the living daylights out of Lockyer everywhere he goes on his campaign trail and not permit anyone to forget what a slug Lockyer is.
15 posted on 06/13/2002 10:18:46 PM PDT by BluesDuke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Colombia59
You think these Socialists are only in California?
16 posted on 06/13/2002 10:22:25 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Avoiding_Sulla
I think we need the article here!
17 posted on 06/13/2002 10:25:57 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
Davis and Lockjaw and Burton are all cut from the same cloth!.

Davis is much more clever at hiding it. Lockjaw has revealed himself many times!

18 posted on 06/13/2002 10:28:55 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS, d14truth
Isn't it amazing? The moderator changes the name back to inane title the L.A.Times gave this editorial (undoubtedly to bury it) rather than the more attention-getting one I gave it and it makes both your comment and mine at number 1 meaningless.

You'd think the moderators would have caught on by now that publications choose the titles they use rather than the authors of the material.

Hint guys: The L.A. Times is neither a friend to conservatives nor a fan of FR.
PLEASE STOP HELPING THEM bury the important stories!

19 posted on 06/13/2002 10:33:19 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; Jim Robinson
Please take it up with JimRob.
Believe me, I tried that twice. Wasted a good deal of the day too. And risked my FReep handle to boot.

And that is eventhough this editorial was republished by Cato, the employer of the author, and not LAT.

Apparently the rub is that it ORIGINALLY appeared in LAT. And new FR policy regarding usage of WAP and LAT articles greatly limits the amount we can post here. No more than one or two lines from the piece is what I was told. It some ways it's a positive step if you think about it. FReepmail me if you want more info. ;^)

Meanwhile, if anyone clicks on Cato Institute up at the title line it'll take them here http://www.cato.org/pubs/papers/palmer-06-06-01.html

20 posted on 06/13/2002 11:11:35 PM PDT by Avoiding_Sulla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson