HILLARY'S WAR DOUBLE TALK: 'John Kerry could not have said it worse himself.' (swift-vet audio)

hillary clinton, swiftvets.com, john kerry, The New York Times | 2.2.07 | Mia T

[CBart95]

Everyone will want to hear the soundbites of Old Hil at the Demoscats Winter Meetings and being aired by her stable boy, Rush Limbaugh today.

She's added a harsh gravelly Bella Abzug snarl to her speechyfing that is wonderfully Bull Dykey...a perfect and fitting repugnancy for such an attractive advocate of HATE.

[RightWhale]

Her recent Conversations were 99% her irrelevancies and 1% reformulated blended questions from her worshipful base. She is so far from relevancy that she might as well broadcast from the far side of the moon.

[SMARTY]

Evita does not have a gram of conviction or commitment in her. She is politically, just as opportunistic and shamelessly self-promoting and arrogant as her 'husband'. Her 'performance' is so maladroit and patently self-conscious that only a regular numb skull would accept it

[Mia T]

Can you say 'megalomaniac'????

[YaYa123]

"I think she's a greater threat"

Me too!! Hillary's handlers, in concert with her MSM idiot savants, will do for Hillary what they continue to do for Bill: Turn character flaws, personal vices, gaffes and goofs, into virtues. You know the drill, it's already started. Saturday Night Live skits and late night comics will morf her into the same kind of loveable liar that Bill has become, and she'll be praised for being so skilled a self-serving scoundrel.

[AKA Elena]

Through my tears for the loss of MrConfettiMan, I thank you for yet another great presentation of fact about the Dark Side.

Young Joe (MCM), surely put on his armor for us as you use your special talents to create the announcement of so many interesting truths.

Thanks and special thanks for keeping me in your loop.

[MHGinTN]

Forgive me, but every time I read the following, I have a response I do not offer ... I'm gonna respond this time:

"Missus clinton's life seems small, and there is a reason for it: There aren't any characters in it." Actually, Mia, there is no character in Hillary Rodham; she had too many characters around her as she merely slithered along amongst them, acting as willing and even eager enabler for these characters in their degeneracy.

What Hillary Rodhamster's handlers must do in order to get her elected is create the image of character upon a screen where there is no character, no strength of character or worthiness. Hillary was in fact a victim of degenerate bill's malignant character. With such a person who was not only a victim but a willing enabler for the continuance of her victimhood America should not be victimized, because this woman will make US visits not only of her missing strength of character but victims of our dangerous enemies.

Make no mistake, missus clinton is void of character, but surrounded by characters pleading with US to imagine that she has character as our vision is blurred by the constant parade of dissonant characters and media propagandists. The woman is an empty victim. We must not allow her handlers to make US victims with her or because of her vacuousness, further victims of unopposed terrorists and hillary's dream of socialist utopia for America.

[Mia T]

I see your point. Even thought the SNL skit is devastating for hillary (see below), the logic could easily get lost in the political burlesque, especially among the uniformed.

SATURDAY NIGHT LIVE SYNDROME

 

If the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video taken together make plain the absurdity of a hillary clinton commander-in-chief, ⁴ the Iowa misstep reinforces it.

Watching the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" video in succession confirms the obvious: The pundits and pols are asking the wrong hillary! question.

The fundamental question concerning missus clinton's candidacy isn't "Can she win?"... or "Will she win?"... or even "Should she win?"

No. The fundamental question is this: "Can missus clinton be taken seriously? Is missus clinton's candidacy more than simply a bad joke? Is missus clinton's candidacy legitimate? "

By asking the other questions, legitimacy is the presumption, the unasked question, the "When did you stop beating your wife?" sort of fallacy.

But the Saturday Night Live clip and missus clinton's "I'm in!" clip taken together belie that presumption.

The reason the Saturday Night Live sequence is so devastating is because it is not the usual SNL farce based on fact.

Rather, it is fact based on farce.

And missus clinton's "I'm in!" video confirms it.

Let down the curtain: the farce is done. (Rabelais)

Somebody stick the fork in that baby, already. Please.

ADDENDUM:

This exchange on Hardball underscores the farcical condition of the hillary clinton candidacy. Pay special attention to Howard Fineman.

[Twinkie]

Clinton has hit upon the perfect way to have it both ways by keeping her finger in the wind of public opinion polls. Whatever is the opinion of the day, she is for that. Changeable as the wind, but never really changes. A cold, hard woman who intends to be Queen of the World, and pity anyone who gets in her way. I don't know why anyone cares a fig what she SAYS she is going to do about any issue. When one can lie with abandon, then what she REALLY thinks is what she will REALLY do IF she gets the power. . which she must not.

[Mia T]

We actually agree. What I was referring to was precisely her vacuousness. Like the way you moved from 'no characters' to 'no character.'

Where we disagree: That she hooked up with bill clinton in the first place belies your statement that she is bill's victim. hillary knew exactly what she was doing when she hooked up with bill.

[Mia T]

BTW, her 'Viking' reference (when she saw bc for the first time, he reminded her of a Viking) was likely a inside joke (or else she is even more stupid than she appears). (Vikings were rapists.) She was giving her detractors the figurative finger.

[MHGinTN]

Mia, we have been told repeatedly that she was the victim in her marriage. Regardless of how she latched onto the degnerate one, she remained attached to this bulbous-nosed sex addict, making her a victim of his continuous filandering. I've never bought the worship of Jackie Kennedy since she knew all along that Jack was a sex addict 'doing' anything with a skirt, so she too played enabler while he remained alive. HOWEVER, hillary played publicly the victim while privately commanding the enabler role ... and if anyone doubts that, note her directing of the bimbo eruption platoon and her 'handling' of Juanita during her husbands campaign. A woman who will play such a twisted/mentally unhealthy dual role will put this nation in a similar position of being victim while enabling the march of terrorism.

[Mia T]

You are right. hillary clinton plays the victim. For votes. Ask Susan Estrich.
hillary clinton is no 'victim,' and she is no simple 'enabler.'
Missus clinton was complicit in the clinton rapes and predations.

HILLARY CLINTON THREATENED JUANITA BROADDRICK 2 WEEKS AFTER BILL CLINTON RAPED HER (VIDEO)


HILLARY CLINTON KNEW ABOUT THE RAPE: HEAR JUANITA BROADDRICK


SUSAN ESTRICH ON "DREDGING UP" THE RAPE OF JUANITA BROADDRICK + "ALL THAT OLD CLINTON STUFF"


t he clinton-clinton-Broaddrick kind of rape, according to Susan Estrich

ESTRICH IMPEACHED BY HER OWN WORDS,
EXPOSES STOCK HILLARY PLOY: EXPLOIT WOMEN
my amazon.com review


HEAR SUSAN ESTRICH: hillary plays 'the victim' for votes


STRANGE BEDFELLOWS: ED KLEIN AND SUSAN ESTRICH AGREE ABOUT HILLARY


WHY HILLARY MUST NOT WIN. WHY HILLARY CANNOT WIN.
(ICKES + ESTRICH PROVIDE ROADMAP--oops!--FOR HILLARY DEFEAT)


CLINTON RAPES, REVISIONISM, USEFUL IDIOTS AND ENTROPY (an update)


KLEIN BOOK CAUSES HILLARY TO (oops!) CONFIRM "THE TRUTH ABOUT HILLARY"
CLINTON'S REACTION EXPOSES FASCISTIC MINDSET, TEXTBOOK CASE OF PARANOIA + MEGALOMANIA, AND A CONSCIOUSNESS OF GUILT IN BROADDRICK RAPE



CLINTONS' DOCUMENTED ABUSE OF WOMEN


HILLARY! RAMPS UP CLINTON SECRET POLICE: THREAT INTENDED TO SILENCE OPPONENTS


hillary clinton is a "CONGENITAL LIAR"
("I am not a crook")


HILLARY ON THE COUCH
IS MISSUS CLINTON MENTALLY FIT?


HILLARY CLINTON'S Q SCORE
Hollywood take note


THE PUNDITS AND POLS ARE ASKING THE WRONG HILLARY! QUESTION...


THE 'ABNER MIKVA' FACTOR: Why missus clinton will not get the nomination


Were all the pundits wrong about Hillary's strength?


HANGING HILLARY: ClintoNNpolls fraud
HOW THE CLINTONS ARE HANDLING THE HILLARY DUD FACTOR ₆


DENNIS MILLER TAKES ON HILLARY CLINTON:'I'M PRETTY SURE YOU'RE NOT SMART ENOUGH TO BE MY PRESIDENT.'


HILLARY 'the smartest woman in the world' CLINTON USED GYP SHEETS IN DEBATE WITH SPENCER AND BOMBED ANYWAY


1st Feminist Prez Impeached
(clinton, pushed by the "smartest woman in the world," managed to impeach himself)


HILLARY FLUNKED D.C. BAR EXAM
"the smartest woman in the world" sought less competitive venue


HILLARY!?? WHAT IS THIS MORIBUND LOSER DOING IN THE POLITICAL ARENA, ANYWAY? (bill's bud explains)

COPYRIGHT MIA T 2007

[MHGinTN]

We've got a team match going, Mia! Hope folks are getting something constructive out of your considerable efforts.

[RightWhale]

Yeah, and garden variety demagogue.

[Mia T]

bump

[Mia T]

:)

[jla]

I think she's a greater threat. Will be posting on this shortly....

~reaching down and unplugging Mia's Mac~

jla: He means well.

[Twinkie]

Rush played a soundbite from Hillary today where she was commenting on the record-breaking profits of Exxon. She remarked in a very loud, shrill and imperical tone that she is going to take those profits away and work wonders with them. Can someone tell me just how this Wannabe Dictator plans on TAKING profits from anyone? Perhaps someone should suggest that her obscenely and miraculously high cattle futures' profits should be where she begins her philanthropical government giveaway largesse.

[Mia T]

not THAT shortly ;)