I guess I dont...
I was born UK in a UK country...
About 1961 babies born on US soil were natural born American...
Women were sneaking into US Embasssies around the world to have their babies...
The babies were then natural born Americans...
US Embassies are regarded as US soil...
My UK Mom disapproved the practice...
She believed that people should enter the US the right way..
But babies born in Hawaii, the US, inj 1961 are natural born Americans..
So what is it I dont understandd ???
#
Beyond 495
- [ Isalin ang pahinang ito ]
It’s been pretty busy here in Beyond 495 land. We LeftyBlogger types have something exciting in the works. I’m not at liberty to give details just yet, ...
beyond495.blogspot.com/ - Naka-cache - Mga katulad na webpage - Filter
#
the document number of the BC is 495...this is a KOS blogger.
That it’s not up to you to interpret the US constitution. Only the supreme court has that authority.
Can’t help you if you don’t understand the info from the UK Border Agency.
Again, you should stop claiming a child of illegal immigrants born on this soil is a natural born citizen.
If this is the case, I'm inclined to think that it should to be explained clearly to the American people, in a public forum, with an irrefutable demonstration of the supporting facts, should enough people require an explanation.
Please re-read the constitution for requirements to hold office.
House reps-25 yrs old; 7 years citizen.
Senator-30 yrs old; 9 year citizen.
President-35 years old; natural born citizen.
The framers meant to distinguish between citizen and natural born citizen
Those babies were not "natural born Americans", as you put it, but were US citizens by statute. Native born, but not natural born. There is a difference.