Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Question for Palinistas. What will you say when...
vanity | 1-8-10 | Bob J

Posted on 01/08/2010 2:07:44 PM PST by Bob J

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 401-450451-500501-550551-586 last
To: Mojave

Take a bow. You are robertpaulsen.


551 posted on 01/12/2010 6:54:33 AM PST by Lazamataz (America has been dead for a while; It's interesting to watch the cadaver cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

I thought Sarah already had endorsed McCain with her statement that I made into a tagline.


552 posted on 01/13/2010 12:05:14 AM PST by LowOiL ("I adore McCain, support him 100% and will do everything I can to support his reelection" S. Palin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave
You'll note that your latest baseless accusation was pulled. I self-pulled one that I was about to post. RP, if you wish to post anywhere but LP, I'd suggest a little decorum. I'll do the same as regards to our exchanges.

Just sayin'.

553 posted on 01/13/2010 6:41:54 AM PST by Lazamataz (America has been dead for a while; It's interesting to watch the cadaver cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 550 | View Replies]

To: All

Sarah Palin has done nothing in her career to cause ANY rational human being to dislike her, so I’ve been forced to come up with a few reasons that might be driving the (completely irrational) hate:

1. Women who hate Palin are jealous.
Let’s not kid ourselves, she is totally hot as well as
smart and successful.
2. Men that hate her are queer. That can be the only reason
that any man would be compelled to dislike her.
3. Some people are comfortable with the staus-quo in
Washington. Palin is a COMPLETE outsider who would no
doubt turn the cesspool upside down if she were to ever
make it to the White House.
4. Palin seems to be a very moral woman with no qualms about
her beliefs. This makes people with many skeletons to
hide very nervous, as they don’t want ANYONE judging them.


554 posted on 01/13/2010 6:52:47 AM PST by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: All

BTW, for those questioning her intellect, take a look around: barak hussein obama is what you get when you’re worried about “looking smart” and supporting the “smart guy”.
I would gladly trade the “intellect” and artful speaking skills that people claim obama posses for a the common-sense, WISDOM, and moral clarity of Sarah Palin.


555 posted on 01/13/2010 6:55:48 AM PST by Maverick68 (w)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 554 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I self-pulled one that I was about to post.

Thank you for posting to me to tell me that you didn't post to me.

556 posted on 01/13/2010 7:52:06 AM PST by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 553 | View Replies]

To: Mojave; Admin Moderator; Jim Robinson
So was your answer Yes or No?

This would be another of Mojave's repeated attempts in this thread to portray Sarah Palin as a pro-abort because she had a D&C after her child died in the womb. Apparently making hay with the natural death of an innocent child is the sort of thing that passes for being pro-life in his world. I'm going to answer his question, not to egg him on, but to make it clear that those of us who respect the Governor and oppose the evil of abortion have no fear of posers.

Still, could y'all take the boy aside for counseling or maybe even take out the trash?

Mojave, I already answered your question when I said that if what Palin had was an abortion, that means undertakers are abortionists. Her child died, and then the remains were removed. She did not stop--abort--the progress of the pregnancy. I'm sure you're asking this as a "yes or no" question because you have some "gotcha" citation where this procedure is technically called an abortion or some crap like that, but my answer remains the same. I lost a child the same way Palin did, so I can speak to the reality, rather than employ jargon to obscure the core truth.

But what gets better is that what prompted this question from you was me pointing out that you might have to choose between Sarah and a babykiller in a future primary, a reference to your (legitimate) attacks on pro-abort RINOS. So, if we technically say that the governor has had an abortion because she had some remains removed to avoid sepsis, does that make her less pro-life? Well, last time I checked, pro-lifers aren't opposed to moving a dead body from one location to another, we're opposed to killing babies. Calling Palin a RINO or a pro-abort for this would be like saying Brett Favre is a bad quarterback because his Little League batting average sucked, or because you didn't like the way he drove his tractor.

Anyone who called for the Vikings to fire Favre because of his Little League batting average would be deranged, wouldn't you agree?


"Palin Madness Syndrome you have. A very bad case it is. Go to a mental hospital, you must."

557 posted on 01/13/2010 8:04:41 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 538 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

I’ll take that as a No.


558 posted on 01/13/2010 8:08:47 AM PST by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 557 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Gee, ya think?


559 posted on 01/13/2010 8:11:52 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 558 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

The weed has damaged your brain. Joining you and the nutbag Ron Paul crowd to “try to get our country back” would be like fighting Al Qaida by gathering a militia and attaking the local Wal-Mart.

I stand with Reagan. I’m taking the GOP back. You go follow the wild shrimp money and keep smoking that chronic.


560 posted on 01/13/2010 8:20:18 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 539 | View Replies]

To: LowOiL

Yes, but if BobJ acknowledges that, he can’t post a vanity and get to be a big drama queen.


561 posted on 01/13/2010 8:23:53 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 552 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

I’m about to not post to you again.

There. See?

Here’s another one I’m not going to post.

There. Wow!

I’m good at these!

Wanna see it again?

There! NEATO!

(Seriously, I just wanted to give you a heads up on where my healthy boundary might be and how enforcement of that boundary might occur, just for your own benefit. I don’t hate on ya, bro, I understand ya.)


562 posted on 01/13/2010 8:30:42 AM PST by Lazamataz (America has been dead for a while; It's interesting to watch the cadaver cool.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 556 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
You seem to think that Reagan & Paul may have been bitter enemies. The fact is that they were not. Just the opposite was true, & as you can read on my profile page, Reagan even praised Dr./Rep. Paul!

BTW, that is REAGAN'S handwriting, not Pauls. You don't thinkj that Reagan was smoking something do you (not that there's anything wrong w/ that)?

How about this one:

Keep drinking your anti-Paul kool aid if you so desire. Idiot.

563 posted on 01/13/2010 9:05:58 AM PST by ChrisInAR (You gotta let it out, Captain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback
Here's another one, & I think it has the same comment that I put on my profile page:


564 posted on 01/13/2010 9:09:58 AM PST by ChrisInAR (You gotta let it out, Captain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR; Mr. Silverback

Cool pics! Are those from before Ron Paul came out as a moron?


565 posted on 01/13/2010 9:12:16 AM PST by Larry Lucido
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

Not really. But since a straight answer wasn’t given, I picked one.


566 posted on 01/13/2010 10:17:20 AM PST by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 559 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR
Yes, I've seen your profile page where you display that you don't even have the intellectual capacity to tell the difference between rope and chronic.

Despite his supporter's claims that he is the unchanging rock that all the toxic waste in DC flows around, Ron Paul is not the man he used to be, and he wasn't a blame-America-first wacko when Reagan said nice things about him. There's no way the Gipper would look at a bunch of Islamists putting a kiloton of combat power into an American office building on a Tuesday morning and call it our fault. I'm sure the endorsement came before it was revealed that Paul was either a racist or (more likely) was so incompetent he couldn't publish a newsletter without having a bunch of racists ghostwriting for him. I could go on, but it's clear that any candidate running with Reagan's foreign policy and domestic vision today would be called a globalist friend of big government by Paul and his supporters. Moreover, Paul is just a different flavor of Newt Gingrich: Another Washington fixture who charges to the front of the conservative movement to declare himself the only legitimate leader.

Go back to your bong, sir. It's your friend. It will never endorse John McCain, or appear in a photo with him.


567 posted on 01/13/2010 10:20:13 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

When you asked if something was an abortion, and I said it wasn’t, how was that not a straight answer? Been sharing the chronic with ChrisinAR?


568 posted on 01/13/2010 10:25:05 AM PST by Mr. Silverback (We're right, we're free, we'll fight and you'll see!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 566 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR

Oh No! Next you’ll post pictures of Reagan with that most dreaded enemy of conservative republicans Pat Buchanan. Say it ain’t so!


569 posted on 01/19/2010 6:33:01 AM PST by TradicalRC (Secular conservatism is liberalism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 563 | View Replies]

To: Bob J

Good predictions.


570 posted on 01/20/2010 11:46:50 AM PST by Mojave (Ignorant and stoned - Obama's natural constituency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mojave

Unfortunately it wasn’t difficult.


571 posted on 01/20/2010 12:05:46 PM PST by Bob J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 570 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson; All

OH, God bless you Jim Robinson, God bless you. Thank you for penning these words of support for the rest of us at FR and for your leadership herein.

Kudos to you and yours brother...and to our patriot brothers ans sisters in Mass...WAY TO GO MASS.!!!! You’ve done us proud!!!


572 posted on 01/21/2010 6:41:53 AM PST by el_texicano (Liberals, Socialist, DemocRATS, all touchy, feely, mind numbed robots, useless idiots at best!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: 9YearLurker

No—the MSM and George Soros manipulated the primaries so that the most conservative candidates NEVER got air time or any other coverage—remember that McCain was broke and about to give up in late ‘07? In last place since the beginning, then all of a sudden HE’S the frontrunner?!? Something VERY rotten in the state of Denmark there!

NEVER AGAIN. Voters have awakened and are doing their research before going into the voting booth and just pulling the R or the D lever...NO MORE IGNORANT VOTING FOR WHOEVER HAPPENS TO BE ON THE TICKET.

Massachusetts is just the beginning.


573 posted on 01/21/2010 7:34:55 AM PST by pillut48 ("Stand now. Stand together. Stand for what is right."-Gov.Sarah Palin, "Going Rogue")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
Hey! It's li'l Bobby Jay taking another whack at the Greatest American politician in the new century again! What's the matter? Wrist got tired from spanking Tiny Bobbie, so you decided to type for a while? Makes about as much sense as your hatred for Sarah.

You are as pathetic as I have seen in my 13 years on FreeRepublic, and I frankly don't know why Jim puts up with your assinine waste of bytespace.

****RINO ALERT!!!****

;-/

574 posted on 01/21/2010 8:02:41 AM PST by Gargantua (Appropriate that the re-birth of our great nation WILL be delivered by a woman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

“You should probably change your screen name to Quagmire.

Giggity, giggity, giggity...”

Taken.....


575 posted on 01/21/2010 10:32:12 AM PST by GQuagmire ( We are no longer Massholes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 217 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

That is EXACTLY how I feel! WOW!


576 posted on 01/22/2010 8:34:00 AM PST by Republic (Get the uhbama's, reid's, pelosi's dirty greedy fingers out of our personal medical care!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
I just noticed your post was quoted over at Conservatives4Palin (well the PG-13 part). Don't ever go PC on us. We love you just the way you are. Dam the torpedoes, full speed ahead.
577 posted on 01/23/2010 6:24:46 PM PST by McGruff (Love ya Sarah but I will support and contribute to JD Hayworth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: McGruff

Well, shoot. Had I known I was gonna be quoted I would’ve shaved and put on a clean t-shirt.


578 posted on 01/23/2010 7:12:18 PM PST by Jim Robinson (Join the TEA Party Rebellion!! May God and TEA save the Republic!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 577 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; Jim Robinson

Bookmarking this thread for the time when JR/FR officially turns on Gov. Palin. Just a matter of time. She’s human, she has flaws like all the rest of us and once that’s discovered(and her classy support of the man who brought her to the dance is just the beginning), she will be torn apart by those who are tearing Bob J apart in this thread. Guaranteed.


579 posted on 01/24/2010 5:22:52 AM PST by Reaganesque ("And thou shalt do it with all humility, trusting in me, reviling not against revilers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson
Sarah is unabashedly pro-God, pro-Life, pro-Liberty, pro-family, pro-America, pro-constitution, pro-gun, pro-limited government and so am I. And she’s wildly popular among the God-loving, Liberty-loving folks with whom I choose to associate. In short, she’s a refreshing breath of clean fresh air in an otherwise putrid failure of a RINO infested party.

She represents my interests better than any other viable wannabe at this point and if she decides to run, she will have my undivided support!!

Dittos Jim. I have not heard is said better.

Good Hunting... from Varmint Al

580 posted on 01/24/2010 8:42:41 AM PST by Varmint Al
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: Bob J
You forgot another one:

It's not that surprising Palin would support McCain since during the campaign she said the only thing they disagreed on was drilling in Alaska.

Was that accurate or not? Maybe they agree on more things than we know. I say give her a pass on this one.

581 posted on 01/24/2010 8:49:52 AM PST by crunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ChrisInAR; Mr. Silverback
I haven’t heard Palin discuss whether or not she has an Originalist view of the Constitution like I do (if some folks call that “libertarian”, then so be it).

Sure, she sounds good on a few issues, & I think she’s a patriot...but what would she do about advocating the elimination of federal dept’s & buraucracies that voilate the Constitution?

How seriously would she enforce the 10th Amendment?

Would she support having a non-interventionist foreign policy that the Founding Fathers believed in, or would she continue to use our military to fight wars all over the globe rather than defending America first?

Etc., etc., etc.........

Do you think the founding fathers supported government payments for disabilities? What is your position on that? Do you think that's included within an "originalist view of the Constitution"? Where does Paul stand on Social Security disability for those who need it?

BTW, you used to post under the username "libertyman", an account that now shows up as banned. How did that come about?

582 posted on 01/24/2010 12:36:27 PM PST by streetpreacher (Arminian by birth, Calvinist by the grace of God)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

BTTT


583 posted on 01/24/2010 1:46:24 PM PST by hattend (Mary Jo, this one's for you! (Thank you, Massachusetts - welcome back to the union))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 521 | View Replies]

To: streetpreacher
Do you think the founding fathers supported government payments for disabilities? What is your position on that? Do you think that's included within an "originalist view of the Constitution"? Where does Paul stand on Social Security disability for those who need it?

I know that most of the Founders did NOT favor the fedgov being involved in helping the poor or disabled. NEITHER DO I. I think this is another issue that should be the responsibility of the states. There is an important statement that was made by James Madison on this topic, & I wish I could remember where I found it.

I know that Rep. Paul opposes SocSec...so what? I admired him long before I became legally blind. The principles that he espouses are much more important than me. Heck, if I was gonna be a single-issue voter & support the conservative Welfare State ( now there's an oxymoron!), then I might as well be an average Republican.

However, since the federal gravy train is rolling, I might as well get on board. I have been given a ticket due to my being legally blind, so like any normal person, I don't want it to leave the station w/o me.

I argued w/ my family about this before I filed for Disability. My mom was worried sick about me (literally!) & I began to feel guilty about that & finally caved in. I lost my house, my job, my career, & my car in the process of satisfying her, & doing so is one of the worst decisions I have ever made, I must admit. Not to mention the fact that I also moved from the city that I loved in order to be nearer to them. Now that she has passed away, & jave moved back home to Little Rock & couldn't be happier.

584 posted on 01/24/2010 3:14:15 PM PST by ChrisInAR (You gotta let it out, Captain!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: farlander
Get back to us when it actually happens.

hmmm

585 posted on 01/25/2010 6:33:53 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Bob J; EveningStar

I’m laughing so hard, I can hardly type...Which, is probably a very good thing...


586 posted on 09/30/2010 3:08:08 PM PDT by MaggieCarta (I apologize for nothing. Sorry it had to be that way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-50 ... 401-450451-500501-550551-586 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson