Posted on 03/08/2014 6:07:03 AM PST by Flotsam_Jetsome
So when did Ann's and Obama Sr.'s "whatever happened happened fast" wedding happen? For no apparent reason, confusion abounds among Obama's biographers over the wedding date:
1. Dreams claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were in married "in 1960"; similarly, Mendell's 2007 book claims that the couple were married "sometime in late 1960" when they "slipped off alone to the island of Maui"; and both Obamaland (2008) by Ron Jacobs (with contributor David Maraniss) and a 2007 Washington Post article claim that the two were married "late in 1960."
2. A 2007 Chicago Tribune article vaguely claims that Ann and Obama Sr. were married "six months before" Barack's birth on Aug 4, 1961 -- or, in other words, sometime in early 1961.
3. An April 2008 Time article by Amanda Ripley, as does Maraniss's August 2008 article, gives a specific date of February 2, 1961 for the wedding, apparently based on Ann's and Obama Sr.'s 1964 divorce records – mysteriously appearing on the web. But since fake documents have been known to appear on the web, Obama's biographers, Ripley and Maraniss, might want to verify the 1964 divorce documents – especially since a Feb. 2, 1961 marriage date for "Ann and Obama Sr." wasn't reported in any Honolulu Advertiser or Honolulu Star-Bulletin marriage lists from February 1961. Take the February 8, 1961 Star-Bulletin, which listed eighteen marriages from Feb. 3, Feb. 4, and Feb. 6, and no Feb. 2 marriages, and the February 7, 1961 Advertiser, which listed eleven marriages from Feb. 2 to 4, including two Feb. 2 marriages.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
Of course now you will have to show us the letters he wrote to his associates telling them he believed he would be assassinated and that he had already been poisoned, or that his house had been fire-bombed (just for examples) and why his son Mark wasn't in any danger. And the idea that Helen came from a ruling class family doesn't at all match up to the girlfriend of the character the video is ambiguously alluding to...whose relatives walked with all of the Kings and Presidents of the Middle East of the time, plus Afghanistan and Iran...and supped with the Saudi Royals.
That's a very short stick you are using here, I feel like I'm communicating with a five year old. If your intent is to obstruct, you'll need a bigger tool.
“Perhaps the father, having become quite paraniod, having written to various associates that he expected to be assassinated, thought that his male progency would also be target. The mother, very young, very highly placed socially born of parents of a ruling class family”
Even Frank's having a good laugh:
There is no evidence that Stanley Ann Dunham was NEVER in the physical presence of FMD, especially as a young girl! Not a pinch, not an atom, not a nano-particle of evidence.
You’re nutz.
Not to worry, those who insist on keeping the ‘Dream’ alive have their own reasons. Remember our resident fraud examiner, who never saw a fake document in his life? It’s sort of like, it must be true, I saw it on TeeVee.
And if you look at the home pages of the obstructionsists, they have one important thing in common. Their pages are a total blank. It’s like having a conversation with a shadow.
Yes, the poseur-in-chief also had a "composite" girlfriend.
There's so much confusion and obfuscation. Do you think the true facts will ever be known?
What makes you think that Frank Marshall Davis was traveling to Seattle for his sexual teenage encounters with his pregnant wife?
~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
Brown Deer,
Huh? I never said anything like that. You got me mixed up with someone else. WOW! 38 comments from you on this thread! Are you obsessed with Obama or are you getting paid? It’s been a long day and you must be getting weary from all this. Better get some rest. Good night.
I used to think that one item documented and indisputable would bring the house of cards down, now, I'm not so sure. Not when you have people like Loretta Fuddy prepared to supply a forgery, or hand over a forgery that someone handed to her...and Onaka 'verify' yet not sign the verification, (IT MATCHES) just use what might not even have been his official stamp and inital the letter. You haven't just got a bunch of liars driven by their ideolgy, you've got cowards and lick-spittles who would sell their mother and their souls for a mess of pottage as 'they' say. There's something missing. I think it's a spine and a conscience. Your Congress seems to have neither. Like someone wrote to me just yesterday, was it 800 billion dollars and not a cent for the repair of infrastructure which would have provided jobs?
“Perhaps the father, having become quite paraniod, having written to various associates that he expected to be assassinated, thought that his male progency would also be target. The mother, very young, very highly placed socially born of parents of a ruling class family”
.................
Those are your words.
You’re the one that thinks they plausibly inhere to some middle eastern romeo and juliet. Or Malcom X. Or whatever.
It looks like your intent is to scratch the Maltese Falcon, and then send the audience off to Istanbul.
You better go back down to the basement and read your comic books. Our conversation is over.
You had nothing better to do than count all 38 comments? Is that what your contribution amounts to? And then you slink away with a snide remark? Bravo! I’m so impressed. Remember when the going gets really tough, you got the government you probably deserved.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3130965/replies?c=404
yep, that’s you and I cut and pasted the words directly from YOUR comment. It’s right there for everyone to see.
“But if the book was actually written after 1960, it is possible that the author based this character on his relationship with a teen aged Ann Dunham.”
She was a teenager in the 1950s.
March is here. Where is the CCP news?
Seems to be a waste of time there old buddy, the editor had already made it clear that the character of Ann in that book was a Jamaican girl and the events described, if they took place, were when Frank was still living with his first wife. Seeing that he came to Hawaii with Helen in 1948, it’s so far out of date with the Dunham daughter, only the scumbag Joel Gilbert would still try to infer the 13 year old in question was Stanley Ann Dunham.
Who, btw didn’t show up on Hawaii until 1963.
Letting go of the Stanley Ann Dunham as mother myth is just too scary for some people. It would mean accepting NOT KNOWING who zero is, or where he came from. It’s easier to put her into bed with Frank, no matter how gross the idea is.
I pray you are correct.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.