1 posted on
02/13/2009 7:30:24 AM PST by
FatMax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
To: FatMax
Looks like a zothouse publication.
2 posted on
02/13/2009 7:32:27 AM PST by
allmost
To: FatMax
EMP attack would wipe out hundreds of millions of Americans
LOL Hundreds of millions is pretty much all of us unless we live an Nazi Pelousi's little world. Not sure an EMP would have much effect on flesh and blood anyway.
3 posted on
02/13/2009 7:33:20 AM PST by
cripplecreek
(The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
To: FatMax
6 posted on
02/13/2009 7:36:42 AM PST by
CindyDawg
To: FatMax
7 posted on
02/13/2009 7:37:01 AM PST by
bigbob
To: FatMax
Nobody is going to die from an EMP event. The man being quoted, if its an accurate quote, just killed his credibility.
8 posted on
02/13/2009 7:37:23 AM PST by
Badeye
(There are no 'great moments' in Moderate Political History. Only losses.)
To: FatMax
Nonsense. A strong EMP can disable the infrastructure. It can’t “wipe out” an entire continent... unless the genius author has a different idea of what an EMP is. Hyperbole isn’t wise on serious matters.
9 posted on
02/13/2009 7:37:33 AM PST by
SolidWood
("NO on the stimulus package" Governor Palin said.)
To: FatMax
bunk. infrastructure maybe - killing Americans, bunk.
Do I smell ozone???
10 posted on
02/13/2009 7:40:17 AM PST by
kimmie7
(***even deeper sigh***)
To: FatMax
I think you would be in more danger from the source of the EMP rather than the EMP itself.
11 posted on
02/13/2009 7:40:20 AM PST by
CougarGA7
(Wisdom comes with age, but sometimes age comes alone.)
To: FatMax
Ok it’s overstated, but the point remains. Having a pacemaker (at 40 even) I’m not quite so quick to laugh off the threat.
To: FatMax
One EMP will cause Amerika to lose 500,000,000 jobs! - IBTZ.
15 posted on
02/13/2009 7:41:51 AM PST by
OB1kNOb
(Obama? No Hope. Forget Change. Just more of the same old same old. Only worse. Much worse.)
To: FatMax
It’d only wipe out your boyfriends on DU. Freepers generally wear anti-EMP suits to prevent this sort of catastrophe from affecting us.
17 posted on
02/13/2009 7:42:50 AM PST by
cweese
(Hook 'em Horns!!!)
To: FatMax
To be effective, the Electro Magnetic Pulse (EMP) needs to be at altitude or near its target. This means NYC for the most effective damage to financial markets and probably on the ground since I don't think the terrorists have a delivery system that could penetrate our air defenses. I'm not saying it can't be done, only that it wouldn't be easy and likely it would be a single event most likely in NYC.
26 posted on
02/13/2009 7:46:40 AM PST by
econjack
(Some people are as dumb as soup.)
To: FatMax
28 posted on
02/13/2009 7:47:36 AM PST by
Fresh Wind
(Hey, Obama! Where's my check?)
To: FatMax
EMP attack would wipe out hundreds of millions of AmericansOnly if they're all Cylons.
29 posted on
02/13/2009 7:48:00 AM PST by
Redcloak
("Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: FatMax
31 posted on
02/13/2009 7:48:17 AM PST by
WakeUpAndVote
(INGSOC starts 1.20.09)
To: FatMax
Unless we are all robots and not aware of it, I don’t think it would “wipe us out”.
32 posted on
02/13/2009 7:48:45 AM PST by
autumnraine
($335 Million for STD research, still no cure for cancer. Thanks Obama)
To: FatMax
While I recognize there is equipment built to exactly mimic the effects of an EM pulse, for most of us, the closet we can come to seeing the effects is to recall what damage is done by a very close lightening strike.
A distant EMP is limited in intensity by the crucial factor of what voltage causes the breakdown of air as an insulator. Above that voltage, air breaks down and the current flows. We experience this when we slide across a carpet and draw a spark when we reach for a door knob.
The effects of an EM pulse will also vary according to its polarization with respect to power cords, antennas and various wires in every device. Wires that run cross-ways to the pulse will pick up a lot less voltage than those laying parallel to it.
It must be admitted that a bolt of lightening is a type of EMP, even if its frequency curve is lower than one from a nuclear explosion. I was at a meeting when a power pole next to the building received a direct lightening strike that knocked one arm off the power pole. One microwave oven in the building was zapped, but not a single computer, cell phone, or car radio was damaged even though they were just a few dozen feet from where the bolt traveled.
The sum and substance of a deliberate EMP attack will be that some devices will be damaged and some will not be. For that very reason alone, it makes a poor military tactic, even as it will cause an unknown amount of economic damage.
To: FatMax
500M a month!
45 posted on
02/13/2009 7:51:45 AM PST by
evets
(beer)
To: FatMax
Hundreds of millions, Nancy Pelosi math.......
51 posted on
02/13/2009 7:54:07 AM PST by
caver
(Obama's first goals: allow more killing of innocents and allow the killers of innocents to go free.)
To: FatMax
a rabid unicorn invasion is likely going to be a greater and more realistic threat to america than a EMP weapon that isn’t also a nuke.
59 posted on
02/13/2009 7:58:38 AM PST by
jz638
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-27 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson