Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

DUmmie FUnnies 07-01-09 ("Rachel Maddow's Audience Down Nearly 55%")
DUmmie FUnnies ^ | July 1, 2009 | DUmmies and PJ-Comix

Posted on 07/01/2009 6:18:51 AM PDT by PJ-Comix

The previous DUmmie FUnnies EDITION demonstrated the laughable excuses the DUmmies have come up with to explain the high ratings of Fox News. In this DUFU edition we are treated to yet more DUmmie excuses only this time it comes in the form of FUnnie excuses to explain how MSNBC's Rachel Maddow has plunged so steeply in the ratings. You can see the DUmmies struggling to come up with excuses in this THREAD, "Rachel Maddow's Audience Down Nearly 55%." I can give you the easy explanation for her epic fail: she stinks! So what will MSNBC do when they have to ditch Maddow? If the past is prologue, most likely replace her with yet another leftwing loon who will also fail in the ratings department. So let us now watch the DUmmies attempt to explain away Maddow's failure in Bolshevik Red while the commentary of your humble correspondent, noting that Blowhard Ed Schultz is doing even WORSE in the ratings than Rachel, is in the in the [brackets]:

Rachel Maddow's Audience Down Nearly 55%

[To know her is to avoid her.]

MSNBC’s 9pm Rachel Maddow Show has seen its adults 25-54 audience, the demo that cable news advertisers target, fall by nearly 55% from Q4 2008 through Q2 2009.

[The chart above tell the story of her disastrous ratings plunge. And now on to the DUmmie excuses...]

Ouch. That's not promising.

[Mr. Understatement checks in.]

Isn't all cable news down significantly since the election? Why pick on Rachel?

[Sorry, Fox News has held steady since the election. Please think up another lame excuse.]

Either Hannity and O'Reilly have way more dedicated fans or I say there something rotten with those numbers. I mean O'Reilly's numbers haven't moved at all, which seem completely illogical.

[Perhaps the ratings were determined by Diebold?]

I guess you could say that Fox viewers are more loyal, particularly O' Reilly's viewers. I watch Rachel's show but if there's something else I want to watch or I have something to do, I skip it. Maybe Fox viewers have nothing better to do than watch Fox.

[The only thing else to do is watch YOU, DUmmie blue_onyx, on the DUFUs.]

The numbers still seem odd. It looks like June numbers did rise. But FOX numbers jump up to pre-election levels. The other channels don't. I don't think nothing else on TV answers why. It's summer time, people go outside and do stuff. Maybe the other poster is right and FOX is collecting all the crazy by being anti-Obama, but really I would think they'd already max that audience. It just seems really odd.

[An odd DUmmie comes up with an odd excuse.]

Nope sadly Fox is on pace for best year ever

[LOUSY FREEPER TROLL!!!]

I think that's a false positive for FOX. Just like Limbaugh's numbers don't show the truth. Lots and lots of people who watch FOX and listen to Limbaugh don't agree with them at all and are watching just to hear the latest craziness.

[Don't you DUmmies argue that you NEVER watch Fox or listen to Rush?]

I've stopped watching. And I'm the only viewer that I care about.

[Proclaimed DUmmie HiFructosePronSyrup...]

Any particular reason or it just sort of work out that way?

[Inquired DUmmie ThomWV...]

Any particular reason? Just her being a stupid sack of shit.

[Responded DUmmie HiFructosePronSyrup bluntly.]

She's the only one talking continuously about the LGBT issues for example. No one else can be bothered.

[YAWN!]

Maybe it's her time slot. I'd love to see her on earlier...

[Or maybe it is just HER.]

lately she is really rubbing me the wrong way.

[Try laying on your back and perhaps she will rub you the right way.]

I LOVE her show, but it is summer.

[Then watch her continue to Fall in the Fall.]

She is smart and a great analyst, but as a host I find her a bore.

[Hey, at least she scored in two out of three departments.]

I lost MSNBC when Comcast changed my cable package. I can't afford to upgrade, so now I only see clips here from Keith and Rachel.

[Lucky you.]

This is made up crap presented without the benefit of any context or source. It is nonsense on the half shell. It is also posted with bad intent if you ask me. And the same old crowd shouts yes, yes to this utterly meaningless bit of non information. Fodder for fools.

[Is that you, Baghdad Bob?]

I would bet Rachel's numbers would be drastically improved if Internet viewers were to be counted.

[Please continue clinging to that lame excuse if it gives you comfort.]

Rachel is the voice of sanity. We are lucky to have her. I don't understand it either.

[We will now pause as a DUmmie attempts to get a clue.]

I dont think she has a good time slot

[So put her on in the 8 PM slot so she can FAIL there as well.]

Time of the year and time slot. . .

[Can't you think up at least one more lame excuse?]


TOPICS: Humor
KEYWORDS: dummies; msnbc; rachelmaddow
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: skimask

What I love is how in this thread and the previous one these members of the “Reality Based Community” who are soooooo much smarter and more in touch with the “real world” than we neanderthal conservatives have demonstrated that many of them have no idea how TV ratings work.


61 posted on 07/01/2009 9:29:29 AM PDT by Mr. Silverback (We're definitely in the Rise of the Empire era, but is Obama Valorum or Palpatine?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
She's the only one talking continuously about the LGBT issues for example

I'd rather watch Rachel Ray talk about BLT issues...

62 posted on 07/01/2009 9:51:47 AM PDT by mikrofon (Food for Thought)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Silverback

It always amazes me when the Dummies claim to be “Reality Based”. They are as close to reality based as black is to white.


63 posted on 07/01/2009 10:07:40 AM PDT by skimask (When dealing with people who value death over life, traditional means of deterrence will not work)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Time of the year and time slot. . .

Maybe the Astrologer DUmmies can discern something in the stars.

64 posted on 07/01/2009 10:13:19 AM PDT by COBOL2Java (Big government more or less guarantees rule by creeps and misfits.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Condor51
I'm worse off as Comcast in my area kept MSNBC on basic cable. If only we were that lucky. We don't get it in HD.

I wonder if anybody ever explained to the people running MSNBC that it's supposed to be a profit deal, not a showcase for leftists who few people want to see.

65 posted on 07/01/2009 11:01:49 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
I think that's a false positive for FOX. Just like Limbaugh's numbers don't show the truth. Lots and lots of people who watch FOX and listen to Limbaugh don't agree with them at all and are watching just to hear the latest craziness.

Yeah, right. The leftists would no more do that than a conservative would subject themself to Olbermann or Madow or Air America just to listen to the craziness for a long enough period of time to skew the ratings.

66 posted on 07/01/2009 11:13:07 AM PDT by 3catsanadog (I plan to give the new President the same respect and dignity the other side gave Bush.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon; PJ-Comix; Cletus.D.Yokel; bcsco; Paul Heinzman
I'd rather watch Rachel Ray talk about BLT issues.

Add gorgonzola or gefilte fish and you've got BLTG issues.

You'd probably have other issues, besides.

67 posted on 07/01/2009 11:30:58 AM PDT by Charles Henrickson (Issues, Etc.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: mikrofon; PJ-Comix; Cletus.D.Yokel; Paul Heinzman
I'd rather watch Rachel Ray talk about BLT issues...

Make that Giada De Laurentiis and I'm with you...

68 posted on 07/01/2009 12:17:39 PM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix
Is this Maddow person thread the same deal as those Coulter threads where everyone insists that a photo be posted?

I think Racehl is a funny name for a man.

69 posted on 07/01/2009 2:02:10 PM PDT by NYpeanut (pretty is as pretty does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

Ed and Rachel are made for each other. They have a huge audience at DU, maybe DU could find some spare change to hire them.


70 posted on 07/01/2009 11:57:52 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <----go there now,----> tyrannysentinel.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PJ-Comix

As Cincy talk-show host Mike McConnell has explained the reason FOX and conservative talk shows kill lib shows is because conservatives pay attention (to events) and libs don’t. The plain truth is that conservatives are far more aware of what’s going on in the world and naturally listen to and watch shows that tell them what’s going on. Most libs are only concerned about their next hit on the bong. Learning things, like facts, is not in their nature. That’s why they’re libs.


71 posted on 07/02/2009 1:35:20 AM PDT by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockrr
"big seller"

Only when they can pull themselves away from the crack pipe. And that's not very often.

72 posted on 07/02/2009 1:36:38 AM PDT by driftless2 (for long term happiness, learn how to play the accordion)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bcsco; PJ-Comix; Charles Henrickson; Paul Heinzman; Xenalyte; Purrcival; Ditter; Deetes; ...
NEBRASKA SANDHILLS ALERT!

NEBRASKA SANDHILLS ALERT!

NEBRASKA SANDHILLS ALERT!

SCANDAL ROCKS SANDHILLS OF NEBRASKA!

Photobucket

THE QUIET, PLACID, LAID-BACK SANDHILLS OF NEBRASKA!

WHERE ALLEGEDLY NOTHING HAPPENS!

DISQUIET IN THE SANDHILLS OF NEBRASKA!

STORM AMONG THE CALM!

link on next comment, below

73 posted on 07/02/2009 7:14:53 AM PDT by franksolich (Scourge of the Primitives, in service to humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: franksolich

http://www.conservativecave.com/index.php/topic,30483.0.html


74 posted on 07/02/2009 7:15:09 AM PDT by franksolich (Scourge of the Primitives, in service to humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: franksolich
Your post on CC "I don't see anything but pulchtritude among that cornucopia of Cornhusker femmes" could be taken rather lewdly, I suspect...

Oh, my...

75 posted on 07/02/2009 9:15:58 AM PDT by bcsco (I'm a Constitution defender!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson