... #4.
Posted on 10/10/2009 8:03:24 AM PDT by Deepest End
Donofrio: My input is that I do not have any faith in you - Mr. John Charlton - or your publication the Post and Email. I suspect your blog's motivation for existing is directly opposite to the intention of my blog.
(snip)
As of today, October 9, 2009 you are permanently banned from commenting at this blog.
(snip)
No future links to your blog will be posted here. All prior links will remain although this statement will be added as an update. I will not attempt to revise history and erase my prior - very mistaken - support of your blog.
(Excerpt) Read more at naturalborncitizen.wordpress.com ...
Thoughts, comments?
Here is Leo’s whole post:
[ed. My input is that I do not have any faith in you - Mr. John Charlton - or your publication the Post and Email. I suspect your blog’s motivation for existing is directly opposite to the intention of my blog.
As of today, October 9, 2009 you are permanently banned from commenting at this blog. You have the sole honor of that ban to yourself. No other person or journal has earned this distinction. As far as I am concerned, you no longer even exist in the blogosphere.
I do not trust you and I find your attempt to jump from journalist to lawyer arrogant, suspicious and very sad. I will not grace your Seussian Hooplah with another glance. I encourage my readers to ignore your dangerously misleading legal analysis.
No future links to your blog will be posted here. All prior links will remain although this statement will be added as an update. I will not attempt to revise history and erase my prior - very mistaken - support of your blog.
Readers, there appears to be a very well coordinated attempt in the blogosphere to control damage which my recent reports and legal analysis have generated in opposition to the official Hawaii DoH story.
Rest assured, the Hawaii Attorney General’s office provided an opinion to the DoH which was recorded. Both I and another researcher received an official response from Hawaii Deputy Attorney General Jill T. Nagamine a few days ago which clearly denied access to the letter concerning the “natural born citizen” statement made by Fukino on July 27, 2009. It acknowledged the existence of this opinion while claiming attorney client privilege thereto. When the time is right, I will publish on this issue. For the time being, my research and evidence gathering continue.
The question discussed at Mr. Charlton’s blog which was allegedly sent to Nagamine contains one of the most horribly constructed queries one could ever dream up - a true work of Seussian Hooplah which conveniently allowed the “no records exist” answer she gave.
Here is the misleading question sent to the AG’s office:
“I am requesting...Final opinions, including concurring and dissenting opinions, as well as orders made in the adjudication of cases, except to the extent protected by section 92F-13(1), which contain any mention of “natural born citizen” issued by your department in the last 10 years...”
Since the AG will argue that the opinion her office provided to Director Fukino is subject to the protection of 92F-13(1), Nagamine responded that no records exist responsive to that request.
The question above left wiggle room the size of ten football fields for one to slip through. The question appears to have been devised for just that purpose. I can assure you that no serious inquisitor would ever issue a question so devoid of teeth as the one above. Rest assured, the question I asked and to which she responded left no wiggle room.
Do not be distracted. Seussian Hooplah is coming from enemies of the truth as well as those who purport to be in search of the truth. Be aware of it. Understand it. Expose it.
We have them cornered. I couldn’t be more encouraged. Rarely do you get to see the fruits of your labor confirmed in this way. Usually, the suspects keep their mouths shut. But when you place a rat in a corner, he has no choice but to attack. By attacking - they admit to having been placed in a corner.
I expect continuing deception on many levels, but I feel energized that this blog has struck fear in the hearts of those opposed to truth. They are now forced to expose themselves. People sell their souls so easily these days. Who knows how far the rot goes? But for anyone with a desire for truth, the truth will be crystal clear.
The awakening is upon us. But puss must first come to the surface for the infection to heal. Let it come. This is a cleansing process.
Getting the truth to you is my burden. What you do with that truth is yours.
Leo C. Donofrio, Citizen Attorney 10.09.2009 9:14 PM ET]
He seems very confident he’s got them cornered.
Hopefully, MissTickly and Leo can crack this nut using the UIPA. Fingers crossed.
... #4.
I deliberately stayed away from that site, just on a hunch mind you...something didn’t seem quite right to me. I simply ignored what was written there.
I am pretty sure I xcalled them out as the Fence Post & Fail within the last month.
I viewed them as someone who purposely dilutive.
Decent enough writing but there were a few things that got them dumped as a source.
Don’t recall the specifics but, Leo is right on this one.
Hahahahahaha LOL ROFLMA!
OK.
Leo’s gonna melt down again if he does not stop talking and just get busy and stay focused. I hope he does not take his ball home before he carries through on his latest project which seems to have potential - if he can stay calm and move through it to the end. He will probably have to go to court.
The thing that bothers me about Leo is that even with all the evidence Dear Leader may not have been born in the US, Leo acts as if it is the “high moral ground” to accept the internet copy of Obama’s COLB without question and those who question COLB are standing the way of Leo’s ultimate progress.
Therefore, all “birthers” are Leo’s enemies in a way. His stated purpose in pursuing MissTickly’s operation is to get the original birth documents was to prove birthers wrong...not to discover the truth either way. He’s already made up his mind about that - with no evidence needed. Leo’s self esteem is high and his mind is often closed. He gets very angry when dealing with contrarians and he’s using the internet which is full of moon bat contrarians.
The ultimate solution, in Leo’s mind, is his idea that Obama is not a NBC because his dad is a Kenyan which is probably true but has to be prosecuted in DC by a prosecutor and presented to a Judge. So you have two establishment figures who must agree to put themselves in the middle of a politically incorrect constitutional crisis. There is a snowball’s chance in hell any prosecutor is going to take up Leo’s citizen plea in that case. So his narrow minded moral high ground is ultimately self defeating. If not for Miss Tickley he will still be spinning his wheels arguing the fine legal and historical points of Obama’s father’s birth.
As far as his anger at John Charlton...who cares. This is more Leo “moral high ground” drama which seems a lot more prevelant than the progress Leo has made on this case since he first filed with the Supreme Court. Having said all that, he is a special character, he’s smart and I think he has the very good heart of a patriot. I have no doubt he will nail the Hawaii mob if he shuts out the nonsense noise and drama, puts on his poker face and moves in for the kill.
Ping to #12.
.
LD does seem to be High Strung
I’ve been paying a lot of attention to Leo recently given the Hawaii UIPA approach and the apparent potential he has helped MissTickly discover there. I largely agree with your assessment here. Well said!
(btw: minor point, SJ, but for the record, a few days ago when Keyes and Orly proudly announced that Carter decided to proceed with the case, she turned out to be mistaken. Nobody likes a person who says “I told you so,”. Alas, I guess on my bad days, I’m not very likeable ;-)
Sara- That comment is spot on.
Here is another comment from Leo to a poster named Nellie.
Nellie Says:
October 10, 2009 at 7:48 PM
Terri K and I had differing thoughts regarding what information you asked for in this request. She thinks it’s just hospital records, whereas I didn’t see you specify what kind of document it had to be – just the documents they used to say that Obama’s birth information was filed on Aug 8, 1961.
[ed. any document that the registrar relied on back on August 8, 1961 to file a birth event... that’s what I requested. if he wasn’t born in a hospital, then there had to have been another form of notice to the DoH - perhaps a family member or a midwife, etc.]
Would a “no records exist” answer mean that Obama’s posted COLB does not accurately represent what their office would have printed out? There would be no reason for them to put that date if they had no documents submitted that would have initiated the filing then, right?
[ed. if they have no such record then the COLB is missing evidentiary support.]
If that is the case, wouldn’t they have been required to report to the FBI or somebody the falsification of an official government document claimed to be authentic?
[ed. they don’t care much about following their own laws in that DoH...]
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.