Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VANITY - Best Reagan Biography?
9/2/2010 | justsaynomore

Posted on 09/02/2010 3:16:24 PM PDT by justsaynomore

My high schooler has to do a book report on a biography of a famous person, and he chose Ronald Reagan.

Any suggestions on the best Reagan biography?


TOPICS: Books/Literature; Politics
KEYWORDS: reagan

1 posted on 09/02/2010 3:16:29 PM PDT by justsaynomore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Lou Cannon had a good one, iirc.


2 posted on 09/02/2010 3:17:32 PM PDT by Huck (Q: How can you tell a party is in the minority? A: They're complaining about the deficit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

“Where’s the rest of me?”, President Reagan’s first autobiography is very worthwhile as he describes where he came from, before he actually held public office.


3 posted on 09/02/2010 3:21:24 PM PDT by I_Like_Spam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore
Yes, I call this a biography, in a hat tip to the editors: Reagan, in His Own Hand.
4 posted on 09/02/2010 3:32:08 PM PDT by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Reagan, For Those Under 40

By John Carlson (Seattle conservative talk radio host)

This may sound shocking to anyone under 40, but 25 years ago, a lot of serious people were seriously wondering whether America’s best days were already past us.
Time magazine ran a cover story asking “Where have all the Heroes Gone?”
Inflation was 12%, Unemployment over 7% and both were rising simultaneously, giving birth to a new term, “stagflation”. Gasoline was just as expensive as it is today (accounting for inflation), except there wasn’t much to buy and long lines snaked around the block. Articles in respected magazines and newspapers asked whether the American Presidency was “too big a job for just one person”.
American soldiers weren’t the good guys. Just watch any war movie made in the mid-to late 70’s. If our guys weren’t bad, they were distraught, discouraged, crazy or suicidal.
Just 10 short years before becoming the world’s only Superpower, America seemed paralyzed after Vietnam while the Soviet empire expanded throughout the Third World. And it wasn’t just the Communists pushing us around. Millions of Americans watched Islamic militants sack the American embassy in Iran and march 52 blindfolded American hostages in front of television cameras. They wouldn’t release them for over 400 days.
In the Spring of 1979, President Jimmy Carter delivered one of the most unusual presidential speeches ever delivered from the White House. Known today as the “Malaise” speech, its theme was that America was suffering a “crisis of the spirit”. Even Democrats were not impressed. Carter was challenged for renomination by Senator Ted Kennedy. Carter won (or Kennedy lost, more accurately), but his party was divided and his nation was despondent.
Enter Ronald Reagan. Against this somber background, Reagan insisted that America’s brightest days were still in front of us, not behind us. He rejected the Vietnam syndrome, instead declaring that America was not the cause of corruption and evil abroad, but the cure for it, particularly in facing down Soviet communism. As for solving problems at home, we didn’t need the government to do more, we needed it to do less. The size, girth and expense of government was the problem, not the solution. In an era preoccupied with the “complexity” of insoluble problems, Reagan said “There are simple solutions - just not easy ones.”
Sophisticated people found Reagan, well....... unsophisticated. Also naive, not all that bright, and much too hard line.
But Reagan was telling Americans what they wanted to hear and what they wanted to believe about their country. And when they elected him by a 41 State landslide, he went to work doing what he said he would do.
He said his program to cut income taxes, government regulation and domestic government spending would unleash a rising tide of jobs, prosperity and opportunity. It did. He said that deregulating oil prices would lower the price of gasoline and end the “energy crisis”. It did. He said he would fire the air traffic controllers who were illegally striking if they didn’t return to work. He did.
As for dealing with the Soviets, Reagan said that his program of vastly increasing military spending, planting Pershing missiles in NATO countries and aiding anti-Soviet rebels throughout the Third World would one day relegate Marxist Leninism to “the ash heap of history”. This was too much for his critics, made up of a big chunk of Congress, most university professors, and much of the national news media. They regarded Reagan as either dumb, a warmonger or both, and they insisted that his policies would trigger a never-ending arms race and perhaps lead to the unthinkable – a nuclear war.
When Reagan announced his support for a space-based system to defend the country from a nuclear strike, tensions rose even higher. ABC aired a movie, “The Day After”, about America under nuclear attack. The “nuclear freeze” movement in 1984 was every bit as intense and its demonstrations every bit as large as the anti-Iraq-War movement is in 2004. History has yet to render a verdict on Iraq, but we already know who was right about the Soviets. The dumb warmonger won the Cold War without firing a shot. And soldiers were the good guys in the movies again. Martin Sheen and Marlon Brando in “Apocalypse Now” gave way to Tom Cruise and Tom Skerrit in “Top Gun”.
But Reagan did more than unlock the American economy and liberate millions of people from Communist captivity. He gave America back its smile. His sense of humor helped, but so did his belief that political differences weren’t personal differences, a sentiment that seems to have gone missing on both sides in recent years.
Where should history rank Reagan? Probably as the greatest President in the last 50 years because, like Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Reagan defined and ignited an entire political movement. For FDR it was New Deal liberalism. For Reagan, American conservatism.
Before Reagan, conservatism was instinctively reactive and mostly negative: stop spending on this, don’t do that, etc. Reagan made it both positive and pro-active - a movement based on core beliefs and clear ideas. As Ted Kennedy, of all people, put it, Reagan “wrote most of these ideas not only into law, but into the national consciousness.”
Dozens of conservative think tanks and more than 40 state-based policy centers around the country are daily churning out ideas for policymakers based on free markets, limited government and personal responsibility. Reaganism lives on.
Today we take it for granted in America that great days are still in front of us. We take for granted that lower taxes will stimulate growth. We take for granted that the best way to deal with deadly adversaries is to stand up to them, not make excuses for them.
25 short years ago, Americans didn’t take any of those things for granted. That’s what Reagan changed.


5 posted on 09/02/2010 3:36:59 PM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Many good ones. I recently enjoyed re-reading Dinesh D’Souza’s tome on him


6 posted on 09/02/2010 3:39:54 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

http://old.nationalreview.com/flashback/jos200406052119.asp

“Dutch” is pretty controversial to some. Ultimately I liked it. I have read other books on Reagan...but this author’s arguable devices drew me into the book.

His description of Reagan’s childhood and formative, young years were compelling to me, since I grew up and now live in the turf described in the book.

I also found his writing about the work at the studio during WWII to be fascinating.


7 posted on 09/02/2010 3:46:12 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (The liberal mantra: Never enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore
Here's a great cover for that report...




8 posted on 09/02/2010 4:00:15 PM PDT by Bean Counter (Now what kind of a geroo are you anyway?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Bean Counter

Ha! He’ll get a kick out of that one.

I’m a proud mama that he picked Reagan :)

He is doing a persuasive speech next week on “How Our Liberal Government is Destroying the Economy”. I may have to video tape that one.


9 posted on 09/02/2010 4:03:42 PM PDT by justsaynomore (Eventus stultorum magister)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore
A good one is Ronald Reagan In Private by Jim Kuhn.

Jim Kuhn went from Reagan campaign worker in 1976 to Executive Assistant To The President during Reagan's second term.

10 posted on 09/02/2010 4:15:00 PM PDT by fagin62 (Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Lou Cannon’s Role of a Lifetime is where I would start. It’s pretty straight up the middle.

The D’Souza book is excellent at describing Reagan’s impact but it is pretty one sided. I still liked it a lot though.

I also appreciated the.way the Edmund Morris Dutch book described Reagan’s Hollywood days. While I did not like its fictional pretences, most of the Reagan bios leave out a lot of the formative stuff.

By the same token, there was a book that came out a couple of years ago that explored his years as spokesman for General Electric which was very unique and interesting. But it was very focused on one period of his life.

That’s one of the things people forget about Reagan. He lived an amazing life. Regionally known radio personality during the golden age of radio. Movie star in Hollywood’s golden age. TV pioneer, of sorts. Unlike Clinton and Obama he did not get caught up in the celebrity aspects of the presidency... because he had lived it first hand. And then he moved on. I mean, his first wife was an Academy Award winning actress!

Ronald Reagan lived an amazing life.


11 posted on 09/02/2010 4:16:28 PM PDT by AC86UT89 (America will endure until its government discovers that it can bribe the public with its own money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

Lou Cannon’s “Role of a Lifetime” is excellent as are the Reagan diaries. IIRC there is an autobiography (I assume taken from his writings and speeches) being released on February 11th (the 100th anniversary of President Reagan’s birth).


12 posted on 09/02/2010 4:23:22 PM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

I really enjoyed this book.

Also, as another FReeper said, Reagan in His Own Hand is excellent.

13 posted on 09/02/2010 4:36:50 PM PDT by Retired Greyhound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: justsaynomore

“An American life” by Ronald Reagan. I always say get your information from the source.

Also, “The Reagan Diaries” edited by Brinkley.


14 posted on 09/02/2010 4:51:01 PM PDT by NraFreedom (Zero times anything is still ZERO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia

I read “Dutch” myself and was not impressed at all with the approach of the author. Too many opportunities to tell it different than what it was. I go to the source. Ronald Reagan wrote his own biography. It is titled “An American Life.”


15 posted on 09/02/2010 4:54:07 PM PDT by NraFreedom (Zero times anything is still ZERO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: NraFreedom

Yes, that’s a great book, too.

I linked to the review of Dutch because I think it was a fair review.

I think some people got upset at Morris...but overall, I thought Dutch was a fascinating book.

A person can’t usually just read one book about someone about whom many books were written.


16 posted on 09/02/2010 5:20:38 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (The liberal mantra: Never enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: pissant

Oooooh....I love D’Souza...didn’t realize he’d written a book on Reagan. Thanks for the heads up.


17 posted on 09/02/2010 5:22:09 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (The liberal mantra: Never enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Winstons Julia
A person can’t usually just read one book about someone about whom many books were written.

True enough!

18 posted on 09/02/2010 6:38:28 PM PDT by NraFreedom (Zero times anything is still ZERO !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: AC86UT89

“He lived an amazing life.”

This is why I liked “Dutch”.

I wonder is the story true about when the black football players came to play and no one would put them up, if he really did take them to his home and put them up there without telling them the reason?

Not for a second would I think he would have done anything but.


19 posted on 09/02/2010 7:04:10 PM PDT by Winstons Julia (The liberal mantra: Never enough.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Huck; I_Like_Spam; 1rudeboy; NavyCanDo; pissant; Winstons Julia; Bean Counter; fagin62; AC86UT89; ..

A belated thank you for your answers to my question about a good Reagan biography. There are so many good ones we ended up buying several. He decided to go with Reagan’s autobiography for his book report.


20 posted on 09/08/2010 8:41:09 AM PDT by justsaynomore (Please help us put Herman over 30K fans - www.facebook.com/THEHermanCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson