Posted on 05/01/2011 6:45:48 AM PDT by eastexsteve
I have read a lot of the examinations of this, but I like how you did your own and yours had no speculation. Just facts. And yours was the first one I’ve read, as a non expert, that explained that this document uses both old manual typewriter AND computerized fonts.
You have proven that this document was cobbled together. The others used the layers to say that, but then experts debunked that line of argument. I don’t think that anyone can rationally explain why the document has both old typewritten letters and computerized fonts Within The Same Words.
Good job!!
I can’t get your link to work.
Thanks
” But it would at least be nice to have a mention in the MSM that the document as presented is full of problems.”
And also to have a unicorn with shiny, glittery fur.
I think that the birth issue is a huge waste of energy. Even if it could be proven absolutely, nothing would be done about it. I happen to think there is something hinky about the whole thing, but to pursue it just puts us in the category with those who talk about Roswell, the faked moon landing and the magic bullet in Dallas in November of 1963. Fun to speculate on in private, not so good for winning major elections.
What happens when you click on it?
Fun to speculate in private? Anyone who wants to be quiet and private about a cobbled together document, and not ask both Obama and the Health Dept of Hawaii how the hell the document has both letter written with a manual typewriter and a modern computer, might as well be on his knees in obama’s limousine. Either this should be yelled from the mountain tops or we are supporting a liar.
Proving a liar to be a liar is a waste of energy? I think going on the BC threads telling people to “stop wasting their energy” is a waste of energy.
I tried to find a bio for U K L Lee online and could find nothing on the person. Has anyone looked at that angle? If the guy is real and he signed it then someone has to have known him or been relate to him or something.
There should be a record of a person that worked for the government in Hawaii in 1961 with that name.
I tried to find a bio for U K L Lee online and could find nothing on the person. Has anyone looked at that angle?
If the guy is real and he signed it then someone has to have known him or been related to him or something.
There should be a record of a person that worked for the government in Hawaii in 1961 with that name.
Nicely done. It’s good to have a variety of opinions on this. And this adds a few new points that I haven’t seen mentioned.
In my experience, copies taken from rolls of microfilm are flat not curved. The film is placed between two pieces of glass and projected on a screen/viewer so the image can be sized by moving the lens, focused by turning a lever which adjusts focus, and also aligned up and down and right and left in the center of the viewing screen and then a copy can be made.
I believe the rounding would have to be from the original filming of the document (possibly in a book) not from using the roll of microfilm. Either that or from making a current copy without taking the book apart. (why not?) I would like to know how the books of BC are “bound” usually they would have removable pages held together between front and back covers with binding posts and screws...in other words they individual pages could be seperated from the “book” to be copied. Did Hawaii cut corners on this part of the original microfilming? Did they do it this way to give the impression to the public that the “bound” books cannot have pages removed? If that is so, show us a picture of the book and tell us when the book was permanently bound. Hawaii should have videotaped the whole process from locating the book (in a vault?) to locating the document and showing exactly how they copied it. EPIC FAIL
It amazes me this document has a hand stamp showing it to be a true copy or abstract when by all rights Hawii should have had Dr. Onaka hand sign the document as certified..did they use the hand stamp because it allows for the two options, 1) true copy or 2) abstract and that and signing by hand would have to choose one or the other?
Hawaii still sucks on this issue and has not unmuddied the waters and all Obama has done is thrown fuel on the fire by presenting this document to the public.
The incompetence and/or corruption of our governments scares the heck out of me..Imagine if their is a real document could they have done a worse job of presenting it to the public if they tried?
It’s a miracle that the Dan Rather incident did grow enough legs to make the creep disappear. He was a darling of the MSM, a shill for the dems, etc., but he was taken down by his phony-ing a document. So... it’s POSSIBLE that pointing out the truth about Hussein’s BC will come out eventually and actually make a difference. Not probable, but definitely possible.
Wow, go and help at a soup kitchen, volunteer at church or to clean a park if you have so much time to waste.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nt-2xzDMOjc
Bingo. Either this doc is not what Hawaii gave Obama, or Hawaii is utterly corrupt.
Perhaps one should try to analyze the document at post 5 here?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2713092/posts
There may be server limitations...OR he’s been Google zapped, but it’s not loading.
Ukelele, this is a joke yes?
ping bho bc
“Internet Explorer cannot display the webpage”
I’m on Firefox, maybe that’s the problem. Let me open my IE and repost...let’s see what happens.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.