Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Has the Political Annihilation of Mitt Romney Begun?
Muny Dews Blog ^ | 5-14-11 | Muny Dews

Posted on 05/15/2011 7:42:32 AM PDT by Brookhaven

I'm not prone to conspiracy theories, but it seems as though we seeing the beginnings of a concerted effort by the GOP establishment to eliminate Mitt Romney from the GOP field?

The Wall Street Journal published a scathing piece about Romney titled Obama's Running Mate and followed it up with and article called Romney's Daredevil Act. Scathing is an understatement. By any measure, these were full, frontal assaults on Mitt Romney with only one purpose: derail his 2012 candidacy before it gets started.

National Review Online (which endorsed Romney last time around) published an article by the Editors titled Power Point Failure that was every bit as damning to Romney as the WSJ articles. They have also been an outlet for a number of anti-Romney editorials, including the recent op-ed by Mark Steyn titled Romney's Fix.

The Wall Street Journal and The National Review tend to be GOP “insider” publications. Meaning they have better access to the party's power brokers, and be friendly to the ideas and positions coming from inside the GOP establishment. By any measure Mitt Romney—the presumptive favorite of the GOP establishment and power brokers—should have publications like the WSJ and NRO in his corner, and we should be seeing articles that are somewhat friendly towards Romney. But we're not.

Instead, we're seeing these publications attack Romney with a force that is unprecedented (for a GOP candidate anyway). This implies a larger question: has the GOP party establishment (the national office holders and party insiders) made a decision about Romney—that they can't win with him in 2012 (not just the presidency, but the down-ticket races as well), and they need to get him out of the way now? It's certainly starting to look that way.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; albatrossromney; benedictromney; brutusromney; gop; mittromney; romney; romneybigdig; romneycare; romneyfees; romneymarriage; saboteurromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last
To: Brookhaven

Mitt is a political whore who would take any position to further advance Mitt Romney. No back bone, no true stances on any subject.
Mitt is a RINO piece of garbage. Were he not rich he’d just be a handsome dumbass.


61 posted on 05/15/2011 12:45:37 PM PDT by Joe Boucher ((FUBO))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

If only. Really though, does it matter? Whoever the GOP establishment backs is going to be a RINO. God forbid they ever support a real conservative.


62 posted on 05/15/2011 2:55:42 PM PDT by DangerZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
.... No kidding, I'm tired of perpetual candidates.

Amen brother.

63 posted on 05/16/2011 2:01:49 PM PDT by Ron H. (Only Republicans can turn "snatching victory from the jaws of defeat" into an elevated art form!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network; littleharbour; fatnotlazy; Artemis Webb; arkady_renko; Allegra; ...
Is there a website we can join at?

No more RINO presidential candidates:

Mitt Romney *not* for President

64 posted on 05/25/2011 9:48:23 AM PDT by Is2C (http://www.persecution.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

“Is there a website we can join at?”

Hold muh beer while I register.


65 posted on 05/25/2011 10:05:31 AM PDT by Georgia Girl 2 (The only purpose of a pistol is to fight your way back to the rifle you should never have dropped.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Brookhaven

Why vote for someone whose biggest policy initiative, namely, government controlled healthcare, is already in place in the federal government? Why replace Obama with an Obama twin? It would be like holding an non-election.


66 posted on 05/25/2011 11:43:53 AM PDT by adorno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson