[rolling_stone]

Tell me what college or university has a Bachelor or Master's degree in Document Examination, much less a Phd?

In this famous case, they likely would not put out an opinion without examining the original document. How do inks, paper, age, etc come into play on a photocopy? They could examine the copies of type and typewriting as well as signatures with a microscope, but they could not use other scientific forensic methods to aid their opinions.

Can you tell if a $100 dollar bill is counterfeit by looking at a copy of it on the Internet?

You are asking for a half-a$$ed opinion from an expert who makes their living from their veracity and completeness. Not likely to happen IMO. Maybe you can get Dan Rather's experts—even then they got to touch the documents and wouldn't back Rather...Fake but Accurate/s

[Virginia Ridgerunner]

So here we are---we go from THIS:

You say nothing is proven; many document forensic and technical experts say it’s clear it was a forgery, and show why.

to THIS:

Me and my credentials are none of your business.

to THIS:

There have been dozens of articles and links galore and you want me to do your homework for you?

to THIS:

If you’re too freaking lazy to read any of the articles on FR and instead waste your time asking me to do your homework for you, you obviously don’t want to know anything.

to THIS:

You can read for yourself all the experts who have taken it apart, now prove them wrong!

to THIS:

Since you know all the experts who have proven it to be a forgery are wrong, you must have the PhD degree in the field, and please post a rebuttal of their arguments so we can all see the light.

to THIS:

Prove them wrong. There’s tons of info on FR and some posted right on this page of the thread.

to THIS:

Sorry to you, but those of us who have been working with pixels for multiple decades are the ones who are called for. Your "forensic document experts" are the sort who understand inks and paper and their ages. They can examine signatures for signs that they were forged. None of that is involved here.

to THIS:

The names will not be posted here. Learn the rules here.

to THIS:

Maybe they might be more comfortable sharing their personal information here after you do the same!

to THIS:

You don’t know what I or ANYONE ELSE has.

to THIS:

You are asking for a half-a$$ed opinion from an expert who makes their living from their veracity and completeness. Not likely to happen IMO. Maybe you can get Dan Rather's experts—even then they got to touch the documents and wouldn't back Rather...Fake but Accurate/s

to THIS:

There are a bunch who would like to testify in court, but the courts won’t let them.

to THIS:

I don’t have any “experts of my own”. It’s all over FR and you can read any of them just as much as I can.

Yeah, Obama is laughing all right, and he is laughing at the fools who just can't accept the fact that the BC issue is over.

Pathetic.