1 posted on
06/03/2011 10:46:27 PM PDT by
kevinaw2
To: kevinaw2
Lets see, new attack by GOP elitist. This will scare all current candidates.
To: kevinaw2
Third party candidates are dead. Palin will take over the GOP and reform it like the rest of the Tea Party candidates and Conservatives who ever it is. Trump is in for a rude awakening if he thinks he will pull a Perot or Buchanan on Us.
And this is coming from a man with a pitchfork in his hand in the early 90's after collage.
3 posted on
06/03/2011 10:55:52 PM PDT by
Lazlo in PA
(Now living in a newly minted Red State.)
To: kevinaw2; everyone
4 posted on
06/03/2011 11:08:32 PM PDT by
onyx
(If you truly support Sarah Palin and want to be on her busy ping list, let me know!)
To: kevinaw2
Job 1. Get the Communists out.
Job 2. Form a true grassroots conservative movement.
Any order other than this will be the political version of wiping your bum then taking a poo.
5 posted on
06/03/2011 11:17:31 PM PDT by
When do we get liberated?
(A socialist is a communist who realizes he must suck at the tit of Capitalism.)
To: kevinaw2
She feels the angst and is trying to get the message to the Beltway Establishment/I don't think they are listening. Don't worry. Obama and Boehner are going resolve everything, on the golf course.
6 posted on
06/03/2011 11:22:24 PM PDT by
AZLiberty
(Yes, Mr. Lennon, I do want a revolution.)
To: kevinaw2
She meant that the RINOs should form their own third party of moderate corporatists and she would take over the GOP and turn it into a constitutionalist party.
7 posted on
06/03/2011 11:33:34 PM PDT by
E. Pluribus Unum
(If Sarah Palin really was unelectable, state-run media would be begging the GOP to nominate her.)
To: kevinaw2
I always think the best, so I will believe that Palin is warning the Repubs not to take the Tea Party for granted. I don't think Palin is dumb enough to think a 3rd party could do anything. Taking over the Repubs is much easier and cleaner. After the next election, we will see how it looks.
Palin is mad after the treatment she and Bachmann received from the party after they handed them a great victory. Now, all the establishment Repubs are crapping on her every day on TV and radio. She will organize the grass roots and holds the power of life and death over many candidates. Just imagine a month or so from now if Romney disses Palin as a has been if he's running first. She could snap her fingers and get support for a Tea Party candidate and crush whoever the Repubs put first.
If you look at it with Tea Party eyes, you see the Repubs are supporting Romney and even Gingrich above Cain, Bachmann, or Palin. Palin could turn the whole thing upside down with a news conference or maybe even a "tweet". I don't think Romney will ever get more than 25% no matter how much money they throw at him.
OTOH, I think it may be time to plan a Tea Party rally in a month or so just to flex the party muscle and get people woke up. There are 10 candidates right now, but that will change soon after Iowa, NH, and SC. Romney will get maybe 20% and who ever the Tea Party anoints will be in the 40% range after that. The others will start dropping with money problems.
8 posted on
06/03/2011 11:35:43 PM PDT by
chuckles
To: kevinaw2
The “in crowd” likes the current situation. While their life styles have never been better, they see the rest of the Country becoming more and more dependent on Government, and to them, dependency means easier control.
Why would they want a Conservative candidate gaining power and changing things?
Doesn't anyone find it odd that every other day a new name of a “potential” candidate is in the media? This has the appearance of an establishment on a shopping trip, trying to find someone new to promote, as their current three stooges just don't seem to be catching on.
The mention of a Third Party publicly is a shot across the bow. But, in the current environment, it is more than just a threat.
To: kevinaw2
The re-election of Obama wouldhave an effect like that of the election of Buchanan in 1856: the country might not survive it.
10 posted on
06/04/2011 12:12:10 AM PDT by
RobbyS
(Pray with the suffering souls.)
To: kevinaw2
Sarah demonstrating cunning strategy.
13 posted on
06/04/2011 5:46:14 AM PDT by
PoloSec
( Believe how that Christ died for our sins, was buried and rose again for our justification)
To: kevinaw2
14 posted on
06/04/2011 8:03:00 AM PDT by
FrankR
(A people that values its privileges above its principles will soon lose both.)
To: kevinaw2
Always vote for principle, though you may vote alone, and you may cherish the sweetest reflection that your vote is never lost. -- John Quincy Adams
20 posted on
06/09/2011 11:43:14 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
To: kevinaw2
Duty is ours; results are God's -- John Quincy Adams
21 posted on
06/09/2011 11:44:09 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
To: kevinaw2
"Let us raise a standard to which the wise and honest can repair; the rest is in the hands of God." -- George Washington
22 posted on
06/09/2011 11:45:11 PM PDT by
EternalVigilance
(Some of us still 'hold these truths to be self-evident'..Enough to save the country? Time will tell.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson