Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times: Keep The Family Peace By Letting Your Teens Have Sex At Home
Pajamas Media ^ | July 24, 2011 | Stephen Kruiser

Posted on 07/30/2011 8:01:41 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby

I wish I was kidding:

Would Americans increase peace in family life and strengthen family bonds if they adopted more accepting attitudes about sex and what’s allowable under the family roof? I’ve interviewed 130 people, all white, middle class and not particularly religious, as part of a study of teenage sex and family life here and in the Netherlands. My look into cultural differences suggests family life might be much improved, for all, if Americans had more open ideas about teenage sex.

Amy Schalet is a sociology professor at the University of Massachusetts, Amherst, via an education at Berkeley and Harvard and a postdoctoral fellowship at UC San Francisco. So it’s safe to say that I’m not surprised that she’s staked out some ground somewhere on the far left of left in her new book. As the father of a newly minted (one week ago) teenage daughter, however, this one has my head spinning around. And not in the fun head spinning around kind of way.

While I haven’t read the book, I am using some of the points that Dr. Schalet chose to illustrate her conclusions. Some of these conclusions seem more like generalizations based on what she picked out from her own book to make her case.

Kimberly and Natalie dramatize the cultural differences in the way young women experience their sexuality. (I have changed their names to protect confidentiality.) Kimberly, a 16-year-old American, never received sex education at home. “God, no! No, no! That’s not going to happen,” she told me. She’d like to tell her parents that she and her boyfriend are having sex, but she believes it is easier for her parents not to know because the truth would “shatter” their image of her as their “little princess.”

Natalie, who is also 16 but Dutch, didn’t tell her parents immediately when she first had intercourse with her boyfriend of three months. But, soon after, she says, she was so happy, she wanted to share the good news. Initially her father was upset and worried about his daughter and his honor. “Talk to him,” his wife advised Natalie; after she did, her father made peace with the change. Essentially Natalie and her family negotiated a life change together and figured out, as a family, how to adjust to changed circumstance.

It is quite unfortunate that “Kimberly” didn’t receive any sex education at home. As this article is laid out, she is supposed to be indicative of the American teenage experience. And she may very well have been if this was written in 1965. It’s true that I haven’t conducted any research on this subject. I am, however, fully immersed in the child-rearing experience, which, at the very least, gives me a legitimate frame of reference from which to form a somewhat informed opinion about this subject.

I’m comfortable responding with anecdotal experiences as there isn’t much detail about the research criteria that would seem to be most relevant to the opinions Dr. Schalet offers. The sample is described as “white, middle class and not particularly religious.” I get the “white” part but am not sure I think that the American and Dutch middle classes are perfectly analogous. And “not particularly religious” is about as helpful as “somewhat taller than a few of the people who live behind one of my next door neighbors.”

The “Gosh, why can’t we just be more like Europe?” meme is a familiar one with academics who write for the New York Times and could easily warrant a book-length response so I’ll leave that for another day.

Another one of the most tedious things about the Times in recent years has been the effort made by contributors to work a left-leaning talking point in any article. Dr. Schalet doesn’t pass up the chance to shill:

Respecting what she understood as her family’s “don’t ask, don’t tell” policy, Kimberly only slept with her boyfriend at his house, when no one was home.

Hey — guess what I got an email about from Obama for America last Friday?

But enough about the hack nature of a newspaper that was great about a thousand years ago. Back to the book. Let us go to yet another quote from the good doctor:

The difference in their experiences stems from divergent cultural ideas about sex and what responsible parents ought to do about it. Here, we see teenagers as helpless victims beset by raging hormones and believe parents should protect them from urges they cannot control.

Or we see them as children grappling with their first encounters with adulthood. I don’t view my daughter as a “victim” of adolescence, I see her as a very, very young person who doesn’t need to be thrown into independence without an instruction book of sorts and a safety net. In other words, she isn’t ready to make adult decisions because she has a very limited understanding of consequences. So, much to the chagrin of Dr. Schalet and many other progressive types, I will continue to parent; I won’t punt the responsibility to my child.

The Dutch parents I interviewed regard teenagers, girls and boys, as capable of falling in love, and of reasonably assessing their own readiness for sex.

Don’t call your eye doctor, you did just actually see the words “teenagers” and “reasonably assessing their own readiness for sex” in the same sentence. It’s probably not a stretch at this point to wonder whether Dr. Schalet was ever a teenager. Her op-ed scholarship continues in the next sentence:

Dutch parents like Natalie’s talk to their children about sex and its unintended consequences and urge them to use contraceptives and practice safe sex.

The implication, of course, is that American parents do not.

I am a practicing Roman Catholic, admittedly overprotective father and I’ve had conversations with my daughter on the subject. We went over every sex-education lesson she got in school, both before and after. Naturally, she wasn’t thrilled to be talking to her dad about any of it but she relaxed a little and actually brought it up after a while. We were able to do this because we have always communicated which, of course, is the foundation of any success a parent can hope to have once the kids start navigating the random waters of puberty. I harbor none of the illusions that Dr. Schalet continually implies “American parents” have. In the past year, I have talked to many parents from backgrounds far more diverse than the sample used in this book and found that I’m not an anomaly. Again, this isn’t olden times, many of us do try to communicate with our children now.

Let us move onto the most blood-boiling statement from Dr. Schalet:

Normalizing teenage sex under the family roof opens the way for more responsible sex education.

That is the second time in the article the word “normalizing” is used. Dr. Schalet employs the tired progressive academic tactic of defining the terms of a faulty premise from which to continue unabated on to predetermined conclusions. And these conclusions only work if you are willing to radically redefine normal as she sees it.

Which I am not.


TOPICS: Society
KEYWORDS: liberalism; liberals; moralabsolutes; progressives; progressivism; sex; teensex
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

1 posted on 07/30/2011 8:01:50 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
There was a family down the street from the house I grew up in that tried this, back in the early '70s. Dad was a big shot at the local university. It turned into kind of a Brady Bunch situation, with co-ed roommates.

They all turned out pretty messed up.

2 posted on 07/30/2011 8:05:14 PM PDT by Steely Tom (Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

Satan has his way.


3 posted on 07/30/2011 8:07:13 PM PDT by Celtic Cross (The brain is the weapon; everything else is just accessories. --FReeper Joe Brower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Funny, what passes for "research" these days. Funny in a pathetic sort of way.
4 posted on 07/30/2011 8:08:53 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

And if home doesn’t work for trysts, there’s always willing public school teachers.


5 posted on 07/30/2011 8:09:24 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

The reason I don’t go to NY Times for life advice.


6 posted on 07/30/2011 8:10:01 PM PDT by rosepetal2010 (The government is NOT your friend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

At least keep a working lock on the bathroom door.


7 posted on 07/30/2011 8:10:12 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

What could go wrong?


8 posted on 07/30/2011 8:10:41 PM PDT by Cyber Liberty (Oh, well, any excuse to buy a new gun is good enough for me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Initially her father was upset and worried about his daughter and his honor.

Dear Mr. Kruiser,

I'll ignore all your other hopey-changey Obamaisms and just zero in on this one, for which you should be run out of town on a rail.

The concept of a "fether being worried about his honor" involving his daughter's relationships, is a cover story for Muslims commiting murder against their own family members. Got that, jackass? MUSLIMS ONLY.

NO ONE ELSE ON THE PLANET murders their family members by invoking the word "honor," you lying piece of garbage. "Honor" does not mean, nor justify, murder, to ANYONE ELSE EXCEPT MUSLIMS, you filth.

So take your lying, seditious, apologetics for murdering Muslim scum, and your grotesque and insulting implication that ANYONE ELSE ON THE PLANET EXCEPT MUSLIMS would invoke the concept of "honor" to murder their own children and SHOVE IT.

Catholic? You're a Leftist tool, is what you are. And your shamelessness is matched only by the perversity of your lies, and your protection of child murderers. You. Are. Scum.

I - HOPE - I've been clear.

9 posted on 07/30/2011 8:16:02 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Here, we see teenagers as helpless victims beset by raging hormones and believe parents should protect them from urges they cannot control.

Teaching self control is one of the most important jobs a parent has. It transcends the issue of teenage sex: drug use, theft, traffic laws, indulging in anger, etc. Parents that abdicate their responsibility are ultimately abdicating the norms that allow people to live together harmoniously in society.

10 posted on 07/30/2011 8:20:50 PM PDT by mlocher (Is it time to cash in before I am taxed out?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Back in the day cars had decent sized backseats.

Now...

It's like...

"Hey, isn't that Bills' daughter???"

11 posted on 07/30/2011 8:22:06 PM PDT by bigheadfred ("I consulted all the sages I could find in yellow pages but there aren't many of them")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

Calm down and read the article. Mr Kruiser didn’t say that. It was said in the book he is talking about and no one said anything about Muslims and murder either. The father was worried that his reputation would be ruined because he had a daughter that was having sex.
Wow is all I can say.


12 posted on 07/30/2011 8:23:21 PM PDT by christianhomeschoolmommaof3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

I can envision several scenarios where this would end badly.


13 posted on 07/30/2011 8:26:52 PM PDT by WorkerbeeCitizen (I STAND WITH ISREAL!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Talisker

That portion is not from Kruiser, but a quote from Amy Schalet’s book comparing sexual attitudes of Dutch and U.S. parents.


14 posted on 07/30/2011 8:27:23 PM PDT by TheDingoAteMyBaby
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
I’ve interviewed 130 people, all white, middle class and not particularly religious...

Glad to see they found away to keep race involved is such a high quality "study."

15 posted on 07/30/2011 8:38:09 PM PDT by matt04
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby

In high school, it was always best to date girls who had moms that worked.


16 posted on 07/30/2011 8:38:33 PM PDT by trumandogz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: matt04

My son wanted to have his girlfriend move in with us.

I didn’t say No, I said Hell no.

Kids are hardheaded, they got an apartment, even got married eventually, that lasted 6 months when she ran off with another fellow of the darker persuasion.

Kids won’t listen they know it all ,and have been told that by their teachers and the new morals in America.


17 posted on 07/30/2011 8:44:04 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: TheDingoAteMyBaby
Any man who knowingly lets his teenage daughter screw in his house as he is sitting watching TV is a pussy. Another difference between the US and the Netherlands, besides the fathers in Holland are pussies, is the 2nd Amendment.
18 posted on 07/30/2011 8:46:21 PM PDT by gusty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WorkerbeeCitizen
I can envision several scenarios where this would end badly.

Like any of them where my daughters were involved.

MARRIAGE! THEN SEX!

Not terribly rational on the face of it, but it's a winning sociological strategy, and kids learn better when the message is simple and repeated often.

I had a complete porch shotgun that actually never got put together until both girls were married. It stayed next to the rocking chair, ready for yet another cleaning. Shovel leaned up next to it.

/johnny

19 posted on 07/30/2011 8:48:26 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gusty

Application for Permission to Date My Daughter
APPLICATION FOR PERMISSION TO DATE MY DAUGHTER

NOTE: This application will be incomplete and rejected unless
accompanied by a complete financial statement, job history, lineage,
and current medical report from your doctor.

NAME_____________________________________ DATE OF BIRTH_____________

HEIGHT___________ WEIGHT____________ IQ__________ GPA_____________

SOCIAL SECURITY #_________________ DRIVERS LICENSE #________________

BOY SCOUT RANK AND BADGES____________________________________________

HOME ADDRESS_______________________ CITY/STATE___________ ZIP______

Do you have parents? ___Yes ___No
Is one male and the other female? ___Yes ___No
If No, explain:
______________________________________________________________

Number of years they have been married ______________________________

If less than your age, explain
______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

ACCESSORIES SECTION:

A. Do you own or have access to a van? __Yes __No

B. A truck with oversized tires? __Yes __No

C. A waterbed? __Yes __No

D. A pickup with a mattress in the back? __Yes __No

E. A tattoo? __Yes __No

F. Do you have an earring, nose ring, __Yes __No
pierced tongue, pierced cheek or a belly button ring?

(IF YOU ANSWERED “YES” TO ANY OF THE ABOVE, DISCONTINUE APPLICATION
AND LEAVE PREMISES IMMEDIATELY. I SUGGEST RUNNING.)

ESSAY SECTION:

In 50 words or less, what does “LATE” mean to you?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

In 50 words or less, what does “DON’T TOUCH MY DAUGHTER” mean to you?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

In 50 words or less, what does “ABSTINENCE” mean to you?

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

REFERENCES SECTION:

Church you attend ___________________________________________________

How often you attend ________________________________________________

When would be the best time to interview your:

father? _____________

mother? _____________

pastor? _____________

SHORT-ANSWER SECTION:

Answer by filling in the blank. Please answer freely, all answers
are confidential.

A: If I were shot, the last place I would want shot would be:

______________________________________________________________

B: If I were beaten, the last bone I would want broken is my:

______________________________________________________________

C: A woman’s place is in the:

______________________________________________________________

D: The one thing I hope this application does not ask me about is:

______________________________________________________________

E. What do you want to do IF you grow up? ___________________________

______________________________________________________________

______________________________________________________________

F. When I meet a girl, the thing I always notice about her first is:

______________________________________________________________

F. What is the current going rate of a hotel room? __________________

I SWEAR THAT ALL INFORMATION SUPPLIED ABOVE IS TRUE AND CORRECT TO
THE BEST OF MY KNOWLEDGE UNDER PENALTY OF DEATH, DISMEMBERMENT,
NATIVE AMERICAN ANT TORTURE, CRUCIFIXION, ELECTROCUTION, CHINESE
WATER TORTURE, RED HOT POKERS, AND HILLARY CLINTON KISS TORTURE.

_________________________________________________________
Applicant’s Signature (that means sign your name, moron!)

_______________________________ ________________________________
Mother’s Signature Father’s Signature

_______________________________ ________________________________
Pastor/Priest/Rabbi State Representative/Congressman

Thank you for your interest, and it had better be genuine and
non-sexual. Please allow four to six years for processing.

You will be contacted in writing if you are approved. Please do
not try to call or write (since you probably can’t, and it would
cause you injury). If your application is rejected, you will be
notified by two gentleman wearing white ties carrying violin cases.
(you might watch your back)


20 posted on 07/30/2011 8:48:35 PM PDT by dfwgator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-86 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson