To: Psalm 73
In a slander or libel suit, I believe that the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove the defendant lied willfully. In cases such as this, a lawsuit is almost impossible to win, and does nothing more than give an opportunity for the MSM to publicize the libel/slander.
Not a good idea. Sorry.
42 posted on
09/15/2011 6:39:25 AM PDT by
fantail 1952
(They don't make 'em like Reagan any more. Now it takes a woman to do a mans job!)
To: fantail 1952
Yep. The last thing a candidate for office can afford to do is to wrap him- or herself up in such lawsuits.
To: fantail 1952
In a slander or libel suit, I believe that the burden of proof is on the plaintiff to prove the defendant lied willfully. In cases such as this, a lawsuit is almost impossible to win, and does nothing more than give an opportunity for the MSM to publicize the libel/slander. Not a good idea. Sorry. Then there is only one other reasonable option.
McGuiness needs to be 'disappeared'.
60 posted on
09/15/2011 1:17:07 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(If Hitler had been as lazy as Obama, the 1940's would have been a very nice decade!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson