Posted on 12/08/2011 3:17:03 AM PST by scottfactor
BTTT.
Maybe I just need coffee.
Because of Abortion and Gay “rights” has DOOMED us.
There are a veritable cornucopia of competing ideologies, cultural differences, and lifestyles that are hell bent on tearing this nation apart.
When it will finally collapse into complete chaos, is subject to much debate, but it’s a mathematical certainty.
There is a war going on and sometimes it’s not so overt as in the story described above. For example, there is a very popular ad running on TV right now -
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xn0pzzuKzNc
In this ad, the dressing room barrier is broken down, but were are prone to laugh at it and even chortle that the guy in the ad is a “lucky dog.” I have to admit, I laughed at it the first time I saw it.
Now, take out the hot babe and insert the guy dressed in women’s clothing from the story related above and it’s not so funny any more, is it?
The hedonist heathen won’t be satisfied until the Thanksgiving Day Parade is filled with floats of giant dildos and Mickey and Underdog humping.”Oh joy! What a gay day! Let’s go molest some boys!”
I don't need Macy's. How about we never give them any business again and warn all our friends to do the same.
I think she was very smart to play the religion card. This gives her access to representation by several groups, including the one that got involved.
As a female, if I saw a GUY (even in makeup, heals, and a dress) in a ladies dressing room or restroom, I would freak...
and in Texas, those of us with our CHL’s freak with heat.
The simple answer is for people who are obviously male, and dressed as male to demand to use the women’s dressing room. If told they cannot do so, the obvious answer is to create a really big scene. Ruin their business until their policy changes.
Just FYI.... Macy’s is a large donor to PP
read later
“Just FYI.... Macy’s is a large donor to PP”
Which is why I won’t even step a foot into their store...
If MANY more people adopted that same principle, there would be some changes.
Or to go to the local Macy’s and, when using the dressing room, ask loudly if you can be assured there will be no perverts hanging around, unlike the store described in this story. You might even want to vocally demand that Macy’s explain why the 98 percent of the population that is sexually sane should have to tolerate the sickness of the 2 percent that isn’t. And why dementia is welcomed during this season but Christians are not.
KLBJ in Austin has this as a topic today. Of course, the sodomites here think it is OK to be queer, a cross dresser or being allowed to screw the pooch.
Macy’s has been less than pro-Christmas in the last few years...
I do not shop there at all and will not in the future...
One of the only things (other than vote) that I can do to protest what is happening in my country...
It did not have to be a "religious freedom" moment, but in her case, it was. It could just as easily been a "freedom of conscience" moment for someone who may not even be a Christian but who adamantly rejects the mainstreaming of homosexuality, or who firmly believes men have no business whatsoever going into a private area reserved for women to undress.
In Natalie Johnson's case, it is a matter of going against her knowledge of what God thinks about homosexuality if she caves in and lets the homos have their way--knowing in her mind and spirit that it is completely wrong. But, that is the goal of the radical homosexuals--to subvert everyone else's knowledge to their perverse desires.
Sorry. She was hired to work under policies that permitted trans folk to use the dressing room of their choice. It’s not her place as an employee to say that she disagrees with the policy and unilaterally refuse to follow it.
I would certainly not take kindly to an employee working for me doing such a thing. A pink slip would definitely be in their very near future.
Tex, the actual deal is that Macy’s has pissed on the Constitution. Freedom of religion is a God-given right that our U.S. Constistution is meant to protect.
Macy’s has no business “making a law” that contradicts the Constitution. The same goes for all those big businesses out there that have catered to the radical homos.
Natalie Johnson did not check her freedom of religion at the door when she went to work for Macy’s. Macy’s is acting against the Constitution and needs to be slammed to the mat.
How exactly would her freedom to worship and follow her faith be infringed by following the policy she agreed to abide by as a term of employment?
There is no personal approval involved in abiding by facility usage policies. She can (and should!) state her opinion that the policy is wrong but simple refusal to abide by it seems like a clear reason for termination.
It seems to me that Macy’s is clearly within their rights to determine basic rules for what customers are allowed to do and how employees should treat customers on their dime and on their property.
Sorry. Still siding with the employer on this one.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.