Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ron Paul for President, Are You Freaking kidding Me

Posted on 12/29/2011 10:43:07 AM PST by TheNewPatriot

All you Ron Paul supporters, you are obviously one digit short of a normal IQ or have a single digit IQ. No conservative believes we had anything to do with 911 or believes we brought it on ourselves. Once you step into the realm of 911 being America's fault, you're in the realm of kook ville anti-America rhetoric. I don't want a President that's going to sympathize with our enemies and rationalize it as it must be our fault. We have that already with Obamalama. If you like that, vote for Hussein. Also, being a military veteran, I'm sure as hell not voting for some clueless idiot that denies there's still a threat out there against America and wants to deal with it by dismantling our military. Mr. Paul demonstrates that he has a dangerous and fundamental misunderstanding of the threat posed to every American citizen by radical Islam and the little Hitler running Iran.

Let's also not forget the racist newspaper. Don't even go there with the excuse he had no idea what was being printed. You have to be walking Mr. Magoo not knowing your name is attached to such racist filth. Bottom line, Mr. Paul is many things, but conservative is not one of them and he isn't the answer America is looking for to return to that shinning light on the hill of greatness. Greatness doesn't come from being a pacifist or supporter of leftist social policies.


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012; 911truther; fedcrimes; galvestonsnoopy; goldmansachs; libertarians; randpaultruthfile; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; vanity
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last

1 posted on 12/29/2011 10:43:08 AM PST by TheNewPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Thankfully that will not happen. However, I am more worried about Romney getting the nod. That is more likely. I know I am working hard to ensure that is not going to happen.


2 posted on 12/29/2011 10:44:12 AM PST by napscoordinator (Happy New Year's! The Year the Nightmare is OVER!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

You got it!


3 posted on 12/29/2011 10:44:29 AM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Ah — a honeypot to pull in (out?) the Ru Paul nuts.

I’ll watch this one with great glee...


4 posted on 12/29/2011 10:44:31 AM PST by freedumb2003 (Spoiler Alert! The secret to Terra Nova: THEY ARE ALL DEAD!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Dittos. Ron Paul is a dangerous nut. Since there is no way in hell he will be the GOP nominee, he will probably run as a 3rd party candidate, guaranteeing Obama’s re-election. The sooner Conservatives and Republicans disavow this racist loon, the better.


5 posted on 12/29/2011 10:45:37 AM PST by Astronaut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

Agree.


6 posted on 12/29/2011 10:47:35 AM PST by elhombrelibre ("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

So many Paul seminar callers on talk radio this week.

They start out saying they are long term military, and that they from a long line of military family, and then they say they are Paul fans. Then they say Paul must be best because he has gotten the highest contributuion from the military.

I have heard this call maybe 4 or 5 times this week on different shows.


7 posted on 12/29/2011 10:48:35 AM PST by Sybeck1 (Mitt Romney, a piss poor choice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Let Paul have the anti-American, pro-pot vote. This will drain off 30% of Obama’s voters and assure a conservative victory.


8 posted on 12/29/2011 10:48:54 AM PST by elhombrelibre ("I'd rather be ruled by the Tea Party than the Democratic Party." Norman Podhoretz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

In another time and place, Dr. Paul would have been Dr. Mengele. IMHO


9 posted on 12/29/2011 10:49:55 AM PST by fish hawk (bottom line: I'm voting for WHOEVER wins the republican nomination)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Paul and Bachman are messing up these primaries. I’m friggin’ mad about it.


10 posted on 12/29/2011 10:50:55 AM PST by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
I'm a Ron Paul Trufer!!!!
 
Woo Hoo!!!
/s
 
 
Seriesly. All Paultards need to read this.
 
Saturday, December 10, 2011 4:11:37 PM · 17 of 21
Jim Robinson to Captain Kirk; Admin Moderator

Yes, Ron Paul is a whackjob nutcase Alex Jones truther. All 911 truthers can go straight to hell as far as I’m concerned. You too if you push that crap.

Post that nutjob crap here on FR at your own peril. I’m hereby giving the mods the greenlight to whack your account if and when you go over the line posting Ron Paul/whackjob truther nuttery.



11 posted on 12/29/2011 10:51:53 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Astronaut

Double Dittos.
The guy scares me. And when I heard his son Rand raving about him on Hannity’s radio show, I wanted to scream.
Oh but that he would have tried to talk his father out of running!

Paul is a certified nutcase. And if he splits the vote and pulls a Nader, I agree with you that Bam and Co. will send him a fruitcake on the night of his reelection.


12 posted on 12/29/2011 10:52:17 AM PST by Mountain Mary ("My core is not up for grabs". El Rushbo 12/06/11)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

I personally think Gingrich is the only one that can possibly get us headed out of this mess but I tell you Ron Paul is not as off base as you folks want to make him out. If you do a little research into what he has said you will find a great deal of sound reasoning behind it. I do not wish to argue but I certainly question your integrity when making such a statement against him.He is probably the most honest person running!


13 posted on 12/29/2011 10:53:31 AM PST by E.K. Crossbow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Do you think Ron Paul is worse than Obama? We seem to have a knack of picking loosers for Presidents, or when they get to be president besides stuffing their pockets with money they loose whatever sense they had.


14 posted on 12/29/2011 10:54:00 AM PST by Citizen Tom Paine (An old sailor sends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

You know, I could envision an almost biblical course of events with a Ron Paul presidency. America sits profoundly in the isolationist corner while Iran commences WWIII (or IV) by nuking Israel and parts of Europe and Russia. The entire eastern hemisphere boils over while a siting President proclaims it’s not our concern.

The book of Revelations pretty much refers to this sort of scenario. This is really simplified, but the fact is, the last book of the Bible does not include America in its storyline.


15 posted on 12/29/2011 10:54:46 AM PST by GreenAccord (Bacon Akbar)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
Never even gave him a second thought until the McCain defense bill easily passed with language pulled that would have protected US citizens rights, add to this secretive FED loans to foreign banks, TSA policies.

Have not heard any other candidate speak out against the defense bill.

16 posted on 12/29/2011 10:54:46 AM PST by opentalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
I think most of the Paul supporters who use to post here have gotten the message and left or at least went into hiding. There use to be a sizable Paulbot presence, now there is barely a handful.
17 posted on 12/29/2011 10:57:45 AM PST by apillar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
Your laundry list of anti-Paul charges, each taken out of context, does not hurt Dr. Paul, whose traditional American views are well known to a great many people. What you do, do, is to alienate those of us who respect Dr. Paul, and discourage us from working for the candidate, who eventually gets the nomination.

Why is that? Because your approach suggests that the other candidates are not even aware of very legitimate questions that Dr. Paul has raised about our handling of our foreign policy, in the last twenty years. (I disagree with him, myself, as to Gulf War I, but that is not a current issue.)

I would urge everyone to re-read what George Washington had to say on dealing with the World in his Farewell Address, particularly his analysis of human psychology and the effect of some of the rhetoric that Newt Gingrich & Santorum have been employing. Washington explains the points better than Dr. Paul, but the points are valid.

Incidentally, I have not endorsed Dr. Paul this time around. I have not endorsed anyone, but am hoping for a younger candidate, because the next few years will be extremely trying.

William Flax

18 posted on 12/29/2011 10:58:03 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

We’re all short a few IQ points for allowing the GOP to give us such a pitiful slat of candidates. We just thought 2008 was bad. 2012 is MUCH worse. Anyone but Hussein and Mittens.


19 posted on 12/29/2011 10:59:40 AM PST by bgill (The Obama administration is staging a coup. Wake up, America, before it's too late.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: E.K. Crossbow

If find it interesting that many of you Paulies have signed up for FR in the last few months


20 posted on 12/29/2011 11:02:18 AM PST by mk2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

I’d like to see Paul over at Treasury.

And I’d like to see Rand in the White House down the road a couple of years.


21 posted on 12/29/2011 11:03:01 AM PST by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
Iowa Caucus Instructions:
All Ron Paul supporters, please stand by the wall.

22 posted on 12/29/2011 11:05:18 AM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Nothing is beyond the imagination of the American voter.

If they are willing to put a stranger in the WH, it is not beyond reason that they can vote for Wrong Paul to replace him.


23 posted on 12/29/2011 11:06:23 AM PST by 353FMG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator

Not going to be heckled into supporting another Big Government, Globalist, Open Borders, Big Brother, Flip Flopping RINO.

Paul is not the most fortunate flag bearer for the Originalist voter but he’ll have to do until someone better comes along.


24 posted on 12/29/2011 11:06:41 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

25 posted on 12/29/2011 11:06:41 AM PST by VU4G10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: apillar

Oh trust me, there are a horde of Paulbot spam monkeys who are polluting the threads. They’re ZOT’ted as fast as we find them.

They always manage to out themselves in a cloud of ganja smoke, and are sent packing just as quickly.


26 posted on 12/29/2011 11:07:16 AM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

Ron Paul’s nuttiness aside, when did it become conservative to be world police and military subsidizer?

I don’t hear Dr. Paul saying he would let the world go nuclear without interfering, what I heard was that he would just have constitutionally declared wars rather than conflicts everywhere.

And when did it become “conservative” to shout down free speech and insult people (paulbots, paultards, etc), rather than debating ideas HONESTLY. Most posts about Paul are out of context or downright dishonest.

flame on


27 posted on 12/29/2011 11:07:48 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

I think we did have something to do with 9/11.

We were the object and the target.

The subject was the Arab/Muslim people who had rejected Al Queda, and their methods. It was a temper tantrum writ large, with the potential intent to cause the US and Islam to go to war.

Our oldest ally is, I think, Morocco. And that frosted Bin Ladin’s shorts.


28 posted on 12/29/2011 11:08:04 AM PST by donmeaker (e is trancendentall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Only Ron Paul’s foreign policy is worse than Obama’s.


29 posted on 12/29/2011 11:08:31 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Never believe anything in politics until it has been officially denied.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

so any people who post anything pro-paul have accounts deleted? Sad. Conservatism is about ideas, not just kicking people to the curb when they think 1% differently and agree on 99%


30 posted on 12/29/2011 11:09:41 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Kinzua

Feel good about electing Obama for another 4 years?

How narrow minded.


31 posted on 12/29/2011 11:09:55 AM PST by donmeaker (e is trancendentall)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: GreenAccord
Are you unaware of the technological gap between us & Iran? Your hysterical post assumes as possible things which are hardly possible.

North Korea, which has a very clear technological edge over Iran, is a far more credible threat; but still does not have the capability to accomplish anything on the scope that you suggest.

Either threat can be dealt with, without our invoking the language of panic. May I start by urging a step up of the Reagan plan to offset rocketry from space, as well as pointing out that neither the European powers nor the Israelis are going to sit idle while Iran attacks them. We are not the only technologically advanced people.

William Flax

32 posted on 12/29/2011 11:10:00 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: E.K. Crossbow

Aside from that, Mrs. Lincoln, how was the play?


33 posted on 12/29/2011 11:10:27 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot
No conservative believes we [or Israel] had anything to do with 911 or believes we brought it on ourselves.

You're so right. Some Truthers think we attacked Iraq before 9/11 and this brought on the attack. I had an argument with an American Muslim on that. Had to drop it because he got so heated.

34 posted on 12/29/2011 11:11:22 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

If the RATS were smart enough, I’d give them credit for pulling off the mother of all Operation Chaos stunts with Paul, but they aren’t that smart.


35 posted on 12/29/2011 11:12:08 AM PST by bigbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

I refer you to Post #11 on this thread. The Boss himself said it clearly.


36 posted on 12/29/2011 11:12:27 AM PST by Old Sarge (RIP FReeper Skyraider (1930-2011) - You Are Missed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps
I don’t hear Dr. Paul saying he would let the world go nuclear without interfering, ...

He did say he had no problem with the Iranians acquiring nuclear weapons.

37 posted on 12/29/2011 11:12:56 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1

Correction. Should not have said Truthers in reference to those that contend we brought on 9/11 but acknowledge that Muzzies did it.


38 posted on 12/29/2011 11:13:53 AM PST by luvbach1 (Stop the destruction in 2012 or continue the decline)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Old Sarge

Well I guess this is my last post. I am a casual observer, if Paul went over the line, I disassociate myself from anything extreme.


39 posted on 12/29/2011 11:14:28 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

There’s no way Ron Paul ever wins the nomination.

People may be divided on the candidates, but NO ONE has Paul as their second choice. It’s either Paul #1 (amongst the Paulistinians) or dead last.


40 posted on 12/29/2011 11:14:43 AM PST by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps

Conservatism is about ideas, not just kicking people to the curb when they think 1% differently and agree on 99%

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Newbie - are you a trufer? If so? Say so.

IBTZ.


41 posted on 12/29/2011 11:15:02 AM PST by Responsibility2nd (NO LIBS! This means liberals AND libertarians (same thing) NO LIBS!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: rokkitapps
Where did I suggest that Ron Paul had "Nuttiness?!"

I defended his foreign policy views, and merely stated that my concern was over his age! He is a very respected older statesman in my view & I will certainly support him, if he is the nominee.

William Flax

42 posted on 12/29/2011 11:15:06 AM PST by Ohioan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

Preach it, Brother.


43 posted on 12/29/2011 11:15:07 AM PST by Calpublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Responsibility2nd

What’s a “trufer”? What’s a “newbie”? Thanks


44 posted on 12/29/2011 11:17:08 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

You guys are too funny, you’re frothing at the mouth over Ron Paul and how he’s going to destroy this country and that he’s a crazy racist and oh throw in that he’s a 9/11 truther. Must be the devil himself running for president!

But who are you supporting? A bunch of RINOs that once in office won’t do squat to bring down the size of government or do anything about the loss of freedoms we have suffered in the past few decades. Don’t know what you guys are smoking but it must be pretty good stuff to keep you from seeing that the establishment RINOs are no better than the current RATS in charge right now. And in case you haven’t noticed the US has already been pretty much destroyed both socially and economically thanks to government regulations, over-spending, incentivizing the off-shoring of manufacturing, promising more ($33 Trillion more for entitlements than we have according to the latest GAO report), etc. Stick a fork in us because we are most certainly done. And yet you guys froth at the mouth and spray spittle all over the place over Ron Paul. You should wake up, why do you think the MSM, the RATS and the RINOs are so terrified of him actually getting into power? Maybe because they know he’s crazy enough to actually try applying the breaks before we hit the wall at 100 mph and maybe cut off the gravy to these pigs in Wall Street.

I don’t think that Ron Paul has a chance in hell of getting elected given the political climate that we’re in. But it is entertaining to see a supposedly “conservative” web-site betray every conservative ideal that they have just to keep the most “conservative” candidate from office. I’ll laugh like hell when I read in 2013 you guy crying about all the rotten stuff that the RINO you elected is doing. You’re delusional if you think any of them will change things.


45 posted on 12/29/2011 11:17:27 AM PST by trapped_in_LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

“The other guy is driving us towards a cliff at 100 mph!” is not a reason to vote for someone who would drive us towards a cliff at 80 mph.

I want someone who’s going to lock-up the brakes.


46 posted on 12/29/2011 11:18:42 AM PST by DuncanWaring (The Lord uses the good ones; the bad ones use the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan

Sorry, you don’t get to be an “elder statesman” when you have no idea about the racist magazine you produced under your name and now try to deny. Nice Try!!!!


47 posted on 12/29/2011 11:19:06 AM PST by Calpublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: TheNewPatriot

We need to bear in mind there is a reverse operation chaos going on in Iowa. Democrats will be out in force to vote for Paul and try to saddle us with that turkey.


48 posted on 12/29/2011 11:20:37 AM PST by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donmeaker

Not my fault. If the GOP doesn’t address the concerns of the Constitutionalist/Originalist voter, they will be alienating what appears to be a large contingent of voters.

From what I’ve read from his supporters, they are not so much supporting the man as his platform. If they are that aware of the issues, I wouldn’t suspect a little name calling is going to cause them to run into the arms of another soggy old Obama-lite RINO.


49 posted on 12/29/2011 11:21:26 AM PST by Kinzua (Are you ready to admit that electing Obama was a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: trapped_in_LA

be careful... see post (#11).. you can get deleted for posting about Paul. I am a conservative, but a casual observer as I am not happy with the field. Be careful, apparently Paul posts can get you deleted.


50 posted on 12/29/2011 11:21:26 AM PST by rokkitapps ( Hearings on healthcare waivers NOW! (If you agree make this your tagline))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson