Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Mental Derangement of Ron Paulís Campaign
Red State ^

Posted on 01/08/2012 4:44:27 PM PST by mnehring

Supporters of Ron Paul produced a hit job on Jon Huntsman attacking Huntsman over his adopted daughter. His daughter, ftom China, was left for dead in a market and the Huntsmans intervened, got her back to good health, and adopted her.

Someone put up a video attacking Huntsman adoption as proof that Huntsman is a foreign agent.

The video began circulating among Ron Paul supporters and when Huntsman called them out, the Ron Paul campaign swung into high gear and produced a report that I can only venture to suspect was written by someone hopped up on gardasil, having acquired the mental retardation Michele Bachmann warned us about.

The Ron Paul campaign — NOT SUPPORTERS, BUT CAMPAIGN — analysis concludes that Jon Huntsman attacked his own daughter in an attempt to smear Ron Paul.

Yes, friends, it has come to that level of dain bramage.

While the media is licking its chops over the he said – he said of the Ron Paul “analysis” I should note that ridicule of the families of the other candidates is par for the course for Ron Paul supporters.

Here’s a Paul supporter on Ron Paul’s wall on Facebook ridiculing Rick Santorum’s family:

1 6 2012 1 38 02 PM

The Paul campaign could have had the common decency to just say it was a supporter and condemn the attack on Jon Huntsman and his daughter.

But the Paul campaign seems only willing to condemn black people, Jews, and gays. Everyone else is fair game, including the children of other Presidential candidates.

What’s even more disturbing though is the Politico and other news outlets treating the Ron Paul defense as legitimate and questioning the Huntsman campaign. That’s not something the media even did to John McCain in 2000 with the awful attacks on him in South Carolina.

Pitiful all around.



TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 911truther; commielibs; libertarians; nazisocialism; nazisrsocialists; randpaultruthfile; rino; ronpaul; ronpaultruthfile; simple; thorazine

1 posted on 01/08/2012 4:44:33 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Why would he even go after Huntsman? The guy is at the back of the pack.


2 posted on 01/08/2012 4:47:08 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Are the primaries in NH and SC both open ?


3 posted on 01/08/2012 4:53:08 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Red State once again demonstrating a paranoia bordering on the mentally unstable. Thanks again, fat kid with deficient logic, incapable of comprehending Ron Paul would allow you to have all the carbs and calories you want without government interference.
4 posted on 01/08/2012 4:54:52 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (let establishment heads explode)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

he and his supporters must be still high on dope or they’re just plain nuts, either way the man should not be allowed to run on the GOP platform as he is not a republican nor should be be bale to use the party to spew his lunatic ideas


5 posted on 01/08/2012 4:55:59 PM PST by manc (Marriage is between one man and one woman.Trolls get a life, I HATE OUR BIASED LIBERAL MEDIA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

I don’t like Huntsman but good for him and his wife for adopting this child.
Paul supporters are lunatics and Paul apparently is encouraging them.


6 posted on 01/08/2012 4:59:12 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Irish Eyes

Yes.


7 posted on 01/08/2012 5:10:31 PM PST by mylife (The Roar Of The Masses Could Be Farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

8 posted on 01/08/2012 5:21:15 PM PST by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

Romney -demented.
Gingrich - unbalanced.
Hunsman - unhinged.
Santorum - brain fever.
Perry - kleptomaniac.
Bachnann - Body dysmorphic disorde

What else can we say to keep people home next November?

Big fat dumb head. Forgot that one. Dang, ran out of candidates.


9 posted on 01/08/2012 5:24:14 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Correction:

Romney - demented LIBERAL/0BAMA'lite'

Fixed that right up for ya pal, no charge.
10 posted on 01/08/2012 5:27:36 PM PST by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

You hate Ron Paul. I’ve seen your posts in here for years.
He is definitely not your cup of tea.

That doesn’t give you the right to misrepresent his positions. As far as I know,he has never been against Blacks,Jews or Gays. I say that in awareness that somebody made derogatory remarks and attributed them to him.

Okay,so you hate him. Well,tonight I watched a townhall event after which a Jewish man,with the hat,beard and long forelocks came up to him,smiled and was very friendly to him. He says Isreal shouldn’t have to answer to us or ask our permission to do anything. Further,other countries in the Middle East get far more aid from us than does Isreal. And that is not good for Isreal.

There were Black people and Asian people there too. I don’t know about Gays,but I do know that he has asked in the past what business the government has in marriage. I agree with that position.

You hate him. Okay. Just don’t misrepresent.


11 posted on 01/08/2012 5:28:00 PM PST by FreeDeerHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

I repeat my views on Ron Paul made the other day. That guy is a weasel.


12 posted on 01/08/2012 5:29:42 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: DManA
Here I thought I was writing satire but turns out I was quoting Huntsman talking about his Republican opponeents:

But what about the suggestion that the GOP is nuts? “We are sane when we stand up and we talk about real solutions for the American people,” Huntsman said. “We are insane when we stand up and light our hair on fire, when we engage in political theatrics and soundbites that just don’t make any sense. The American people need real ideas, and they ultimately want to be brought together. They want this country to work.” http://www.powerlineblog.com/archives/2012/01/why-is-jon-huntsmans-campaign-going-nowhere.php

13 posted on 01/08/2012 5:39:14 PM PST by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: mylife

Thanks, look like will be contending with Paul for sometime yet.


14 posted on 01/08/2012 5:40:41 PM PST by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk
As far as I know,he has never been against Blacks, Jews or Gays. I say that in awareness that somebody made derogatory remarks and attributed them to him.

On December 29, 2011, Ron Paul acknowledged that he bore some responsibility for his newsletters. Fine. He said there "eight or ten bad sentences" in them. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826496/posts

I have .pdfs of all or parts of some of his newsletters. There are more than eight or ten 'bad' sentences about blacks, jews, and gays per issue. At least, I consider these kinds of things as 'bad':

And of course the Mossad may have been responsible for the first World Trade Center bombings.

Plus, he's just nuts. Giving advice to militas on how to avoid wiretaps and select members? Those aren't bad sentences?

I could continue with "bad" sentences about how the government created AIDs, or how the government is involved in a disinformation campaign about how bad crack is for you, or about tracking you with your pink money, or about Trilateralist conspiracies, or about the international financial blackmail conspiracy that resulted in the Panama Canal treaty, or . . .

Only eight or ten bad sentences? Then he's nuts and a bigoted anti-Semite.

You realized, of course, that for some reason the people at Stormfront were supporting him again:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2826496/posts

15 posted on 01/08/2012 5:59:02 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: mnehring

You are obsessed. Your hate for him and his supporters oozes from just about every post of yours. I’ll pray for you.


16 posted on 01/08/2012 6:06:13 PM PST by incindiary (http://youtu.be/ifJG_oFFDK0)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk; mnehring

Well, FDH, I don’t hate Paul, I do loath his policies and think he is delusional.
Paul has not been misrepresented on FR.
Has he been mocked for his delusions - oh yea.
Has he been ridiculed because he is foreign policy impaired - you betcha.
Has his thirty year history been exposed just to be denied by with rabid support - yes siree.

So here are some representations of Paul real caricature:

Paul said: U.S. foreign policy “significantly contributed” to 9/11 attacks
Paul said: Israel is in part responsible for 9/11
Paul said: Returning white supremacist donation is “pandering”
Paul endorsed Cynthia McKinney
Paul supports OWS
Paul has been endorsed by David Duke, nazi party of America,
Rev. Phillip G. Kayser, Stormfront and more groups and individuals such as these
Paul has claimed he in fact did know about those “newsletters” and may have participating in writing some of the context
Paul continues to spread the myth that the military supports him (donations)

Really do we need to go on?
Paul needs to go away........


17 posted on 01/08/2012 6:13:31 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Fester Chugabrew

I don’t anyone who supports a lunatic like Paul should be talking about someone else’s mental issues .
You promote a:
Jew hater
9/11 truther
Hates the US military -and called them war criminals
Support Iran getting the bomb
Peddles a racist newsletter and lied about it

That the short list !


18 posted on 01/08/2012 6:33:44 PM PST by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: incindiary

You support a fraud and a madman .
Do you hates Jews like Ron?
Are you a 9/11 truther like Ron?
Did you support the Code Pink / Hamas flotilla against Isral like Ron?
You can not handle the truth just like Ron when
Confronted about his racist newsletter !
Paul ‘s entire support in IA came from Dems !


19 posted on 01/08/2012 6:39:41 PM PST by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
I'll haunt your prostate!
20 posted on 01/08/2012 6:41:45 PM PST by SERKIT ("Blazing Saddles" explains it all......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk

Your doing the spin and lies here .
Your trying to retire history .
Do you the US military and consider them
War Criminals like you leader ?

Hello Paul support are Democrats !
In IA he support was 82 percent Dems !
Stop trying to fool people here with the
Paul bs
The guy is a dangerous nut.


21 posted on 01/08/2012 6:45:23 PM PST by ncalburt (NO MORE WIMPS need to apply to fight the Soros Funded Puppet !H)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

Sorry, but the facts do not bear out your accusations. Try composing and expressing an original thought. And then try backing it up with some facts.


22 posted on 01/08/2012 6:50:08 PM PST by Fester Chugabrew (let establishment heads explode)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: ncalburt

“The guy is a dangerous nut.”

One who has no particular loyalty to the United States of America,to our traditions,values and the Supreme law of our land,the U.S. Constitutions,might believe as you do.


23 posted on 01/08/2012 6:56:00 PM PST by FreeDeerHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Scoutmaster

You,of course,are free to believe whatever propaganda suits your taste,whether or not it is grounded in fact.

Do you respect our Constitutional government or do you want to ride along with those who would destroy your liberty and the protection of your God given rights as a human being?


24 posted on 01/08/2012 7:00:52 PM PST by FreeDeerHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: svcw

No,he has been misrepresented many times,such as your contention that he endorsed Cynthia McKinney. That’s absurd. He did endorse Reverend Chuck Baldwin for President during the last Presidential election cycle.

So that is an example of a misrepresentation of one of his positions that you promulgated here.

Apparently a few unappealing characters have liked him. So what? He has no control over that. Maybe we should launch a digging party about all of the Republican candidates donors. Think there will be any just as if not more objectionable?

Hey,you either want to be free and prosperous or you want economic and social slavery. Decide. The choice is clear.

Further,start telling the truth.


25 posted on 01/08/2012 7:12:03 PM PST by FreeDeerHawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: DManA

While this Redstate might make some valid points, I’d say that all of us need to keep in mind that the enemy is Obama. It costs us nothing to be nice to the often youthful Paul supporters. In the long run, we want Paulites to support the R nominee. We want to try to bring everyone together, as much as possible.

It is Sarah Palin who said just a few nights ago that we, as Republicans, could pay a price if we dismiss or dis the Ron Paul supporters.


26 posted on 01/08/2012 7:15:56 PM PST by Hokestuk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk

WASHINGTON (CNN) 11/2008– Texas Republican Rep. Ron Paul will call on supporters to back a third party candidate for president Wednesday, rejecting his own party’s nominee and offering equally harsh words for the Democratic candidate.
Paul, who unsuccessfully sought the Republican presidential nomination, will tell supporters he is not endorsing GOP nominee John McCain or Democratic nominee Barack Obama, and will instead give his seal of approval to: Green Party nominee Cynthia McKinney


Boston Globe on September 10, 2008:

Former presidential candidate Ron Paul urged his supporters today to vote for a minor-party candidate, saying that he had rejected a last-minute appeal from Republican John McCain for his endorsement.

The Texas congressman cultivated a loyal following and raised sizable amounts of campaign cash online during the Republican primaries.

At a news conference in Washington he appeared with Green Party candidate Cynthia McKinney, the former Georgia congresswoman.


Daily Caller 11/2008: Paul rejected the McCain/Palin ticket, instead embracing Cynthia McKinney

Enough references for you.......


27 posted on 01/08/2012 7:23:17 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk

Interesting you only picked out the McKinney reference and ignored all the others, does that mean you agree? Just wondering.


28 posted on 01/08/2012 7:27:20 PM PST by svcw (For the new year: you better toughen up, if you are going to continue to be stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk
Do you respect our Constitutional government or do you want to ride along with those who would destroy your liberty and the protection of your God given rights as a human being?

As Bill Engvall would say to Ron Paul supporters: Heeeere's your sign:


29 posted on 01/08/2012 7:46:24 PM PST by Scoutmaster (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk

Projecting much. None of those things came up. I just represent Paul’s own words and don’t buy his own backpedaling when he denies he said or wrote it. Sorry, your name is to it for two decades, you made a million a year from it, you own it. His early career in the 80s and 90s were based a lot on these writings. They defined who he was to his fans. You don’t get to pick and choose what was under your name saying ‘well, if it was good, I wrote it, if it were one of the “eight or ten controversial sentences” that make me look bad, I didn’t’. You don’t get to ignore you admitted to writing them in 92 & 93 on national television (CSPAN) and to the Houston Chronicle and Dallas Morning News, then ignore you never said them.

That is his history, along with the lying about his ‘perfect’ record in congress- he is a fraud. Plain and simple.

I’ve followed the old tool since the early 90s when I lived in his district, I know a lot more about him and his circle than I’ve even mentioned here. You really don’t want to go there. I’ve stuck to the big stuff from the major sources, but if the merry band of paultards really wants to go there and claim ‘misrepresentation’ I may pull out the dusty old box of info. Ever hear of Nadia Hayes?


30 posted on 01/08/2012 8:05:43 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: svcw

Hey, you forgot old Ralphy Nader. He was party of the loony trio Paul endorsed. He tried to throw Bob Barr into that mix and Barr would have none of it, calling it a joke and a spectacle.


31 posted on 01/08/2012 8:10:41 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: svcw
Just to drive the tards nuts.

Of course, I'm sure the excuse is, this never happened. This was a 'ghost actor' and not really Paul.

32 posted on 01/08/2012 8:19:11 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: svcw

33 posted on 01/08/2012 8:33:11 PM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: mnehring
Ever hear of Nadia Hayes?

I've never heard of her, enlighten us FRiend.
34 posted on 01/08/2012 11:10:33 PM PST by mkjessup (Jimmy Carter is the Skidmark in the panties of American history, 0bama is the yellow stain in front.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: FreeDeerHawk
No,he has been misrepresented many times,such as your contention that he endorsed Cynthia McKinney. That’s absurd. He did endorse Reverend Chuck Baldwin for President during the last Presidential election cycle.

Now you and all the other paulbots know the surrender monkey endorsed Cynthia McKinney. You are just not programed to think for yourselves or accept the truth.

Further,start telling the truth.


Maybe you and the rest of Cut and Run's surrender monkeys should take your advice.
35 posted on 01/09/2012 2:12:33 AM PST by John D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
On Election Day scores of Lawyers, and Accountants raided the Ron Paul for President Campaign Headquarters and closed down the campaign operation. Campaign Manager Nadia Hayes was arrested by the Nassau Bay, TX Police Department and later convicted for embezzlement of roughly $140,000.

American Libertarian magazine November 1988 described the situation: "�a bizarre twist tough-talking campaign manager Nadia Hayes was sacked the day before the election. And the much awaited last minute campaign media blitz largely failed to materialize�. Paul campaign chair Burt Blumert and Paul campaign ghostwriter and direct mail fundraiser Lew Rockwell showed up... unannounced and unexpected (at HQ). Staff were told that they should leave... locksmiths turned up late in the day to change the locks on the office doors....

...Several had been booted from the Libertarian Party in 1989. They were on the receiving end of a mini-purge largely resulting from the scandal-ridden '88 effort..."

36 posted on 01/09/2012 5:35:52 AM PST by mnehring
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: incindiary; mnehring
The hypocrite, judgmental idolater incindiary will pray to Ronpaul for you.

Thou shalt not blaspheme Ronpaul, the gravest sin of all!

T'is truly sad to see what has become of her.

37 posted on 01/10/2012 5:37:46 PM PST by CounterCounterCulture
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson