OBAMA ELIGIBILITY COURT CASE…BLOW BY BLOW

The National Patriot ^ | 01/26/2012 | Craig Andresen

[GrandmaPatriot]

Given the testimony from today’s court case in Georgia, Obama has a lot of explaining to do. His attorney, Jablonski, was a NO SHOW as of course, was Obama.

The following is a nutshell account of the proceedings.

The case revolved around the Natural Born clause of the Constitution and whether or not Obama qualifies under it to serve. More to the point, if found ineligible, Obama’s name would not appear on the 2012 ballot in Georgia.

Over the last several weeks, Obama’s attorney, Michael Jablonski, had attempted several tactics to keep this case from moving forward. He first tried to have it dismissed, then argued that it was irrelevant to Obama. After that, Jablonski argued that a state could not, under the law, determine who would or would not be on a ballot and later, that Obama was simply too busy with the duties of office to appear.

After all these arguments were dispatched by the Georgia Court, Jablonski, in desperation, wrote to the Georgia Secretary of State attempting to place Obama above the law and declared that the case was not to he heard and neither he nor his client would participate.

Secretary of State, Brian Kemp, fired back a letter hours later telling Jablonski he was free to abandon the case and not participate but that he would do so at his and his clients peril.

[ElayneJ]

for later

[cricket]

Thanks on Federal classification but is Court ‘in’ Atlanta or ‘where’? Anyone know; Perhaps I missed it?

[research99]

A possible "strategy" for the non-appearance by Jablonski has been explained at Liberty Legal Foundation's website. "Understand that the goal of the Georgia ballot challenge was to have a court rule on the merits of the Constitutional question: Does the term “natural born citizen” in Article II of the Constitution require a Presidential candidate to have two parents that were U.S. citizens at the time the candidate was born? Obama wants to avoid having a court rule on this question. That is why he didn’t show up and ordered his attorneys to not show up.

Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan."

http://libertylegalfoundation.org/1665/is-the-judicial-branch-dead/

[AFret.]

Obama was hoping that the Georgia court would enter a default judgment rather than rule on the merits. If the court enters a default judgment, Obama will have succeeded in avoiding the Constitutional eligibility question. He will then appeal the default judgment, get the appellate court to suspend the default judgment pending appeal, and then delay the appeal until after the primary. This is undoubtedly Obama’s plan.”

---

You make it sound so easy..any appeal will generate “discovery”. That is why Orly, Farrar etc. entered a mountain of evidence into the record during the hearing. obama may have wanted a default judgment in lieu of the hearing in order to preclude entering any evidence by the plaintiff’s. Now the court has evidence on file and in the court record that obama will have to defend on appeal...a perfect storm.