Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Poll finds Santorum surging in Gingrich's home state Georgia
The HIll.com ^ | 02/12/12 | Meghashyam Mali

Posted on 02/12/2012 12:55:11 PM PST by writer33

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last
To: Happy Rain

More than that, it sounds like the Newtster himself after losing Iowa! He should follow his own advice, but his abundantly over-inflated ego just won’t let go. He, like RINO Romney, think it’s HIS TURN.


41 posted on 02/12/2012 3:23:48 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JediJones
Thank you for posting that. With all the mis-information out there these days, it's hard for the young’uns to get to the truth. Newt is the real deal!
42 posted on 02/12/2012 3:29:18 PM PST by erkelly (Never underestimate the stupidity of the stupid party!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: RasterMaster

It would be totally irresponsible for Newt to step aside until we see how Rick fares after the butt-whooping that is sure to come his way before Super Tuesday. Newt obviously has far stronger positives than any other candidates in the race given his ridiculously successful career of promoting conservative government, but he suffered from some negative attacks. It would be disastrous if we see Rick get slaughtered under negative attacks after Newt drops out and then have no one to turn to. The Romneybots desperately want Newt to drop out because they know that’s their best plan to win the nomination...whittle the race down to one weaker opponent with a much weaker record of achievement than Newt, and kill him with negatives, leaving nowhere for the votes to go except to Romney.


43 posted on 02/12/2012 3:29:54 PM PST by JediJones (Newt-er Romney in 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600
You are not making any sense. So Rick Santorum should have supported rather than opposed Cap and Trade, TARP, Fannie and Freddie,the auto bail-outs,partial birth abortion, homosexual marriage et cetera et cetera?

I guess when he is president and he opposes Obamacare and tries to destroy it you will think that is a bad thing as well!?!?

You have an impressive drift factor FRiend.

44 posted on 02/12/2012 3:34:33 PM PST by Happy Rain ("If you're shiftless and in doubt-find a liberal whine and pout-pretty soon you're making out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

Newt drops so Ricky Santo can roll over for the Es like he has done all his undistinguished career, leaving a clear path for Romney. Union lackey mission accomplished.


45 posted on 02/12/2012 3:39:07 PM PST by gov_bean_ counter (Yo Mitt - Money can't buy you love...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

This inability for common sense, this automatic twisting and distortion of what other people support, is a sure sign of a Santorumbot, learned by Saint Rick himself!

All Saint Rick offers is the repitition that he is the “True Conservative” and the Holy Christian. He doesn’t have a platform, and all he is quite good at is mocking other people’s positions.


46 posted on 02/12/2012 3:46:18 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600
Whatever—just know that if Newt get the nomination it will be just fine by me—I like the guy.

Just like Rick better.

and remember, I never called you or your candidate a name so at least we had one adult in the room.

tata

47 posted on 02/12/2012 3:51:55 PM PST by Happy Rain ("If you're shiftless and in doubt-find a liberal whine and pout-pretty soon you're making out.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Gingrich’s run is done. He stands ZERO chance at being nominated. He needs to get out and endorse Rick. If he doesn’t we may get Mittens.


48 posted on 02/12/2012 3:52:59 PM PST by RIghtwardHo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Exactly, the Lemming stampede for Santorum is totally impulsive and almost none of then have actually taken the time to research the real Trick Ricky Reverend Santo.

This election is headed for disaster, unless Newt can turn it around. Obama loves the thought of either Romney or Santo as the nominee, and the RNC/GOPE won't have to face the reality of accountability under Newt and company.

49 posted on 02/12/2012 3:53:46 PM PST by PSYCHO-FREEP (If you come to a fork in the road, take it........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

That’s irrelevant since it didn’t stop Newt or many of his foaming-at-the-mouth rabid supporters from calling on Santorum to drop after winning in Iowa. Newt has been losing ground since South Carolina while Santorum has been gaining momentum and money.


50 posted on 02/12/2012 3:57:42 PM PST by RasterMaster ("Towering genius disdains a beaten path." - Abraham Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain

You didn’t call me a name, but you sure did ignore everything I said and even accused me of supporting Obama, when obviously that wasn’t my meaning.

I’m asking you for specifics here, but you just give me the same answers Saint Rick gives... which is basically just accusing the other candidate of being worse than he is, while not giving any solutions of his own.

Saint Rick has you playing in the palm of his hands!


51 posted on 02/12/2012 3:58:31 PM PST by Apollo5600
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA

Did you by chance open the details next to the states? As stated in just one for instance the Minnesota caucuses are nonbinding and the AP is estimating the delegates based on vote totals. That’s it, just and estimate by AP. That can quickly change as we all have seen previously. Also, the Maine caucuses are nonbinding so the numbers being reported by the NY Times are estimates and nothing more. Anyone can make estimates and be wildly wrong so take it with a grain of salt.


52 posted on 02/12/2012 4:19:00 PM PST by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Marguerite
I saw and interview on Greta with Reince Priebus and he said that the GOP was not going to punish Fl twice. He said they had already lost half of their deligates and that was all that would be done.

Video of interview by Greta of Reince Priebus

53 posted on 02/12/2012 4:33:29 PM PST by GrandmaPatriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: writer33

Pure B.S.


54 posted on 02/12/2012 4:49:25 PM PST by Reagan69 (I supported Sarah Palin and all I got was a lousy DVD !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Vermont Vet

I guess that I would rather put my trust in Newt’s claim of repentance over a guy who almost pretends he is “without sin”.
I have known both really good cops and pastors who had initially gotten off on the wrong foot. But because they had been there, done that, they were much better able to relate and deal with “sinners” than those who had led a “spotless” life and want to fix everybody else.
THAT kind sre scarey to me!


55 posted on 02/12/2012 4:51:09 PM PST by bog trotter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cindy of Nashville

Isn’t Ken Osmond a Republican? He’s quite a bit older now than we remember. Aren’t we all?


56 posted on 02/12/2012 5:21:44 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Apollo5600

“Saint Rick,” I kind of like that. It will make millions of liberals outraged; no telling what those mean liberals will do if he were somehow to be our nominee. That said, I do wish Rick were more conservative on economic matters.


57 posted on 02/12/2012 5:24:36 PM PST by Theodore R. (Forget the others: It's Santorum's turn, less baggage, articulate, passionate)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: writer33
Tea Party Activism: Santorum v Gingrich
58 posted on 02/12/2012 5:27:38 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazlo in PA; All

Yeah, I hear ya. Kinda weird but these links explain the difference.

http://www.capitalfreepress.com/4425-stream-media-misrepresents-delegate/

http://www.capitalfreepress.com/republican-primary-delegate-allocation-2012/

As for the motivation for one outfit to use one method and another to do it differently, well, for that you have to consider the source...

.


59 posted on 02/12/2012 5:49:16 PM PST by TLI ( ITINERIS IMPENDEO VALHALLA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Happy Rain
Newt needs to step aside and endorse Rick—otherwise

Otherwise, the rarely conscious American voters will accidently discover, or get exposed to, the truth that Rick Santorum is just as anti-conservative as Mitt Romney.

Santorum spoke out against the TEA Party activists, and publicly vowed to support and promote candidates running against TEA Party candidates.

Tea Party Activism: Santorum v Gingrich

60 posted on 02/12/2012 5:55:14 PM PST by meadsjn (Sarah 2012, or sooner)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-76 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson