Posted on 03/03/2012 7:02:42 AM PST by Erik Latranyi
Just a day after Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Apaio presented proof the birth certificate presented by Barack Obama as proof he meets Constitutional eligibility to be president is a fraud, we have a story coming out of Hawaii that may provide problems for Obama.
Jerome Corsi writes:
Former Hawaii elections clerk Tim Adams has now signed an affidavit swearing he was told by his supervisors in Hawaii that no long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Barack Obama Jr. in Hawaii and that neither Queens Medical Center nor Kapi’olani Medical Center in Honolulu had any record of Obama having been born in their medical facilities.
“During the course of my employment,” Adams swears in the affidavit (viewable in full as part 1 and part 2), “I became aware that many requests were being made to the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division, the Hawaii Office of Elections, and the Hawaii Department of Health from around the country to obtain a copy of then-Senator Barack Obama’s long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate.”
As he inquired about the birth certificate, he says, his supervisors told him that the records were not on file at the Hawaii Department of Health.
“Senior officers in the City and County of Honolulu Elections Division told me on multiple occasions that no Hawaii long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate existed for Senator Obama in the Hawaii Department of Health,” Adams’ affidavit reads, “and there was no record that any such document had ever been on file in the Hawaii Department of Health or any other branch or department of the Hawaii government.”
So the plaintiffs should not have screwed things up by rejecting the default judgement.
There were only two outcomes the judge could have come to - on the ballot or off the ballot. A default judgement would have taken him off the ballot.
bump
Isn't it possible that a default judgement wasn't an automatic "done deal" as expected?
Couldn't Malihi have rendered something other than a default judgement?
When the judge tells the plaintiffs he would render a default judgement and then says the same thing in his written decision, then it is reasonable to assume they would have gotten a default judgement.
I agree with everything you said. We have seen many 1998-2001 zots in the past few months.
I have said it on here on FR many times and I will say it again, sign up date and longevity mean nothing by themselves. The past posting history tells the tale...usually. a 10 year old member may have been a conservative long ago and like you said, somewhere along the line, they remarried a flaming lib, friends, new family members, whoever changed their mind yet they still have their FR account that is 10+ years old.
An Obot or a good liberal troll is on a mission. To change minds, create doubts and concerns. They have to create a persona to avoid detection. That’s what separates the good mods from the MINO’s on any internet forum. It isn’t always easy to bust a concern troll or Obot, Kerrybot, Clintonbot or whoeverbot, especially if they have baked that name for a few years.
I recall a couple of years ago, a 1998 FRreeper who was busted. It was obvious that she just cringed when a single derogatory word was said about Barry. She used her sign up date as a shield to blast anyone who dared to doubt her. However, a little investigation of her past posts showed that in 2004 when Barry spoke at the DNC convention, she drank the Koolaid. Her past posts busted her when all of her Soetoro fawning posts were exposed.
Diogeneslamp, with all due respect, is wrong and he befriends known trolls which is one of the reasons he is not trusted by so many freepers...you can tell a lot about a man by his friends.
There is one troll on here that knows he is skating on very thin ice. His best friends have been zotted( they were long time freepers)and he is all alone now, detested by many, suspected by most and it’s sort of fun to watch him squirm. He’s afraid to defend his Messiah right now so he just sort of wanders around, not posting much anymore. :P
Sometimes if you suspect someone is a long time troll, go back to their first days of posting on FR. If other Freepers were calling them a troll for the first few months, they probably were but as time went on, their longevity saved them and they became more savvy as to how to ride it out as a troll on FR.
I must agree. Harlan’s credibility fell through the floor when he tried to have it both ways with the BC.
After reviewing this morning’s exchanges I can only conclude that he is an Obot. Using typical Obot tactics he shifts about without any discernible principle as he defends Obama by whatever rationalization is necessary at that moment. The end being pursued is not the truth, it is acceptance of Obama.
Once an Obot is exposed don’t waste time with them.
Nobody can be as obtuse as you're pretending to be.
To assume something in a court of law is to be shown a fool.
You have also shown you have no desire for the truth to come out...you manufacture excuses like a rabbit with diarrhea...
Well it’s too late now - perhaps next time.
Sure there are and FR is no different than any other forum. Banned, suspended, zotted, they all usually want to come back. Thank God some of them don’t know how to do it without being detected. Freepers are pretty darn good at spotting retreads. People tend to use a certain posting styles, certain words, certain phrases, and Freepers are darn good at outing retreads, plus JR can out them by their IP’s.
I see that you are still wasting the taxpayer’s money while billing our country as a government contractor at SAIC.
...and Freepers are darn good at outing retreads...
Yep. Practice makes perfect.
...plus JR can out them by their IP’s.
Masking IP addresses has gotten rather sophisticated. I wish him luck in that area.
All the case were consolidated and dismissed as a matter of law. The appeals court said that Georgia law and prior precedence does not give the court jurisdiction over the Georgia Democratic party’s selection of candidates for the presidential primary.
The judge also said that even if the laws under which the defendants appealed were applied, because they failed to properly serve Obama in the first place, their appeal would be dismissed.
Looks like Georgia election law is specifically written to severely limit the power of judges to interfere with the political parties. I am sure there is some interesting history there.
Now perhaps once the primary is over and Obama is on the general election ballot they can try again.
Not at work at the moment so don’t worry.
Do you agree with that decision?
I'll wait and see what happens myself instead of trying to predict the future.
After reviewing this morning’s exchanges I can only conclude that he is an Obot. Using typical Obot tactics he shifts about without any discernible principle as he defends Obama by whatever rationalization is necessary at that moment. The end being pursued is not the truth, it is acceptance of Obama.
Once an Obot is exposed don’t waste time with them.
I have mostly stopped paying attention to him.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.