Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

WND ^ | April 13, 2012 | Bob Unruh

Posted on 04/13/2012 5:32:34 PM PDT by SaveOurRepublicFromTyranny

Now, again, there are words like “egocentric megalomaniac” being ascribed to the White House, and warnings about detention camps and government surveillance of its citizens.

But where previous generations of warnings emanated from lone wolves with their fax machines in dusty spare rooms, the current alarms are being issued by the likes of Investors Business Daily, First Amendment authority Nat Hentoff, New York Times best-selling author Robert Ringer and their equals...

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; coup; dictator; naturalborncitizen; obama; totalitarian
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-122 last
To: Kickass Conservative

From you post #96:

>I’ll go with Mitt and you can stick with Obama.

That’s the signature expression of a Romney Bot, that if you don’t vote for the liar, then you “can stick with Obama”.

Both are enemies.

That you are foolish enough to create a false choice shows you are not familiar with how warfare plays out over time.

Battles are won and battles are lost, but wars are won after having first purged one’s ranks of the disloyal, the treasonous, the double agents, etc.

The Tea Party declared war on the current GOP establishment. The current GOP establishment has fought back by joining the democrats in ridiculing and marginalizing the Tea Party conservatives. Romney is their front man. He is as much a liberal as Obama is but worse because he keeps his true nature hidden within the GOP-E and not the democrat party where he belongs.

This is not a battle between democrat and republican. This is a battle between ruling class and country class.

Your choice is a liberal democrat or a liberal democrat wearing an ‘R’.

Don’t think for one second that your approach to “vote for Mitt or stick with Obama” will go unnoticed while you defend yourself as a ‘Cain’ guy or a ‘Newt’ guy. People here know B*llsh*t when they see it.

101 posted on 04/14/2012 9:17:48 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

Not any more.

I started researching BHO2 in March of 2008, and in the subsequent 15 months had my computer hacked and hard drives destroyed. The first hack originated in a Senate office building, the next two were from Chicago, and the last two were from an undisclosed loction in Washington, D.C.

You might ask Butterdezillion or LucyT. They have a lot of this type of information.

102 posted on 04/14/2012 9:32:10 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Well, I read it. I thought it was a great post. I’m with Newt till the end.

103 posted on 04/14/2012 9:39:04 PM PDT by babyfreep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: babyfreep

Good, great to hear it!

104 posted on 04/14/2012 9:46:00 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll; LucyT; butterdezillion

Thanks for your brave reply. I am on old man so I have less to lose than you do. Thanks for your efforts.

The slaughter of Patriots will increase if Dictator Baby-Doc Barack wins in November.

Key to stopping Obama is to produce childhood friends, and find out through them the details of the Marxist sleeper cell that taught Obama to hate America at the level that he does. Obama Impeachment Proceedings can then begin.

Your gut tells you to laugh, mine tells me that Obama was taught to be a Marxist at a very early age.

Hence, Obama’s childhood emotion will always over rule his adult ability to reason. He cannot be reasoned with, only Impeached.

Thanks again for you reply to me.

105 posted on 04/14/2012 9:52:04 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Dictator Baby-Doc Barack's obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Graewoulf

You are very welcome.

106 posted on 04/14/2012 9:54:40 PM PDT by SatinDoll (No Foreign Nationals as our President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
I'm a Newt guy, get over it.

I'm also a realist, get over that too.

I am sick of this attack mode crapola. Unless you think you are the Amazing Kreskin, questioning my veracity does not improve the debate or make me respect your opinion.

If you are calling me a LIAR, screw you and the ass you rode in on. Don't bother posting back. I'm not here to fight with people. As I already said, you stick with what you think is best as will I. Good night.

107 posted on 04/14/2012 10:09:07 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

You are a Newt guy about as much as the Pope is a Mormon.

108 posted on 04/14/2012 11:04:53 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Hostage
Dude, get over it. This isn't a pissing contest.

Do not post to me again, we're done.

I wish you well. Goodnight.

109 posted on 04/14/2012 11:12:47 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

Don’t post to you? Make me not post.

“I’ll back the liar while you stick with Obama”.

I am to stick with Obama? For not voting for your piece of sh*t liar?

Oh and I am not ‘dude’, understand ‘dude’?

110 posted on 04/14/2012 11:30:56 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; moder_ator
I knew you couldn't resist.
Not a Jeff Bridges Big Lebowski fan huh?

Let me start again, Mr. or Miss, or Mrs., or Ms. or Fellow FReeper.

>>“I’ll back the liar while you stick with Obama”.<<

Now you quote me by using something I didn't say?

Let me repeat. Do not post to me. Third request.

I understand you are passionate about your position, but you are coming across as ridiculous and a little angry.


111 posted on 04/14/2012 11:47:12 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: SaveOurRepublicFromTyranny


112 posted on 04/15/2012 3:32:50 AM PDT by tutstar (MWant pings to Aaron Klein articles and OWS nonsense?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ctdonath2

Show me how Gingrich has a viable path to winning....YOU show me how Mittens has a viable path to winning.

113 posted on 04/15/2012 3:43:55 AM PDT by Safetgiver (The predator class is upset because they are being shot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Totally agree. ABO or lose our country. There was something very unsettling and creepy watching the video of obama in Colombia. The whole SS thing came across as very odd to me - something sinister about the whole episode.

114 posted on 04/15/2012 3:54:45 AM PDT by jersey117 (The Stepford Media should be sued for malpractice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: citizen

Romney & NRA?

Not exactly a fit.

Phoney Romney will do and say anything to get elected.

115 posted on 04/15/2012 3:58:06 AM PDT by Texas Fossil (Government, even in its best state is but a necessary evil; in its worst state an intolerable one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Safetgiver

You mistake me for a Mitt supporter.

Gingrich has no chance of winning the nomination. I’m asking you to show how he does.
Mitt has no chance of winning the general election. I don’t want him, I just want the Obama even less.

Better to spend my energies preparing for the likely civil war, than on a snowball’s chance that Newt could avert it.

116 posted on 04/15/2012 6:18:47 AM PDT by ctdonath2 ($1 meals:
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 113 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

From your own Post #94

“...I’ll go with Mitt and you can stick with Obama.”

There it is, you calling your choice “Mitt” and insinuating that anyone against him is “sticking with Obama”.

The only difference in what I quoted of your writing is that I call him “Liar”.

You call him “Mitt”.

I call him “Liar”.

You as a Romney supporter are not going to dictate who can and who can’t post in this forum.

117 posted on 04/15/2012 1:48:14 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Hostage

When you change a statement attributed to another and substitute a word of your choosing, it isn't a “quote”,
at best you are paraphrasing.

Therefore, my statement to you regarding your misquoting me is 100% correct.

Now, if you disagree with my original reply to your Post, which obviously you do, just tell me you disagree with how I expressed my opinion by reading something into your statement that was not your original intent. It's very easy.

Now I will explain to you why I made the original statement.

IF Romney ends up being the Republican Candidate, the General Election will consist of Democrat Obama versus Republican Romney. You stated you would not Vote for Republican Romney, therefore a Vote for Democrat Obama will not be canceled out by your Vote for Republican Romney but instead will result in an additional Vote for Democrat Obama. We call that ARITHMETIC.

Now, if you choose to Vote for a Third Party Candidate or Write In someone to “make a statement”, your exercise in futility will result in FOUR MORE YEARS of being Governed (and I use that term loosely) by a proven Marxist with nothing left to lose.

Obama will be emboldened to double down on his war on Capitalism and Freedom with absolutely no fidelity to the Constitution.

Here is where things get sticky. It appears to me that about half of our fellow FReepers, including you, think Obama and Romney are equals in their view of the United States of America and how they will Govern as President.

The other half think Obama is the worst of the worst and even having to settle for a RINO like Romney would not even come close to doing the damage that Obama has done and will continue to do. That is why I call the reelection of Obama his “Nothing To Lose” Term. Conservatives / Republicans have absolutely no input on Obama’s actions, but I think that we would indeed have influence over Romney the same way we did over President Bush. Immigration Amnesty and Harriet Miers come to mind.

Where you and I get off track is your belief that I am rooting for Romney. I am rooting for Newt, after having done the same for Palin and Cain. The Reality is that I may be zero for three by the time the Primary Election Votes / Delegates are counted.

Your accusations that I am some sort of “Romneybot” are ridiculous on their face and add nothing to the debate, yet you persist. I assume I am not alone as a target of your attacks, but then again I have not researched the issue. If I am that special one, so be it.

If it is inevitable that Romney will face Obama in the General Election, I see no sense in abandoning the Republican Ticket and giving Obama a cake walk back into the White House. You and others disagree. You think Obama or Romney is a fair trade, while many here think four more years of Obama is the end of the game.

So where does that leave you and I? I am tired of this back and forth that will not change any minds or hearts. I have asked you politely to cease posting to me since I see no benefit coming from it. I do not dislike you, and I hope the feeling is mutual, I simply disagree with your view of the situation as many others on Free Republic do. We are each defending opposite viewpoints and are at a stalemate.

We have a long way until November. People may change their minds many times between now and then. Maybe you won't or maybe I won't, but we are two out of many.

I say we agree to disagree. The horse is dead and is starting to stink up the place. Truce, no more wasted keystrokes. If you choose to go on with this, I wish you well. Pick another target. You and I have reached the end.

Take care...

118 posted on 04/15/2012 5:56:51 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

To: SaveOurRepublicFromTyranny

It’s getting clearer all the time that we have a Hitler II want a be, or, if they got their way, would he make Hitler look like a puny punk in comparison? Hitler had us in opposition. This is likely why we are the first target to take out.

119 posted on 04/15/2012 6:13:41 PM PDT by Bellflower (The LORD is Holy, separated from all sin, perfect, righteous, high and lifted up.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

No I didn’t misquote you....I corrected you.

You call him ‘Mitt’ because you support him.

I call him ‘Liar’ of which there is voluminous evidence and proof to back up.

Romney has still not gained the nomination and he will never win the Presidency so you are barking at the moon in your support of him.

If Romney wins the GOP nomination, it’s over. Obama will be President.

When are you Romney Bots going to get it through your thick skulls that no one likes this phoney? He has no appeal, zero, zip, nada.

Even those who hold their noses to vote for this piece of sh*t will not change the outcome that Obama will be President.

The best that can be hoped for to stop Obama now is for divine intervention to create a brokered convention and let the coward phoney be challenged on floor debates and exposed for what he really is.

Americans will vote for a true conservative who has the talent to articulate the values and heritage of America. Romney has no core, no principles except to join and expand on the corruption that is now rampant.


If Romney wins the GOP nomination, it’s over. Obama will be President.

120 posted on 04/15/2012 7:58:02 PM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Hostage; moder_ator
Whatever. Don't put things in quotes and attribute them to other people when they are not quotes, OK? It's called grammar, not your opinion.

You corrected me? It is not your job to correct me. Say you disagree, make your argument and move on. No need for the personal attack because we see things differently. Just to be clear, I am hoping for a Brokered Convention just as you are because it looks like it is the only way Newt, or anyone but Romney will have a shot. We have no disagreement there.

This whole exercise has been about the possibility, or as many here say, the “likelihood” that Romney will be the Republican Nominee. That is the issue. Not a what if, not a brokered Convention (I wish), not an act of God saving the day.

You say Romney will lose against Obama. So what are you going to do about it? We are half way through the Primaries or haven't you noticed? How are you going to derail Romney? This whole conversation is getting a bit convoluted. You have been accusing me of being a Romney Supporter, which I am not. When I tell you I support Newt, you call me a Liar.

What the heck is your point? This is my last response to you. If you keep badgering me I will hit the Abuse Button (for only the second time in my many years here) and let the Mods deal with you.

Don't post to me again. (fifth request?) I'm getting dizzy going around and around with you and it's getting a bit tiring, if not downright creepy...

Despite our obvious disagreements, and the not so obvious ones, as a fellow FReeper I wish you the best.

121 posted on 04/15/2012 9:30:47 PM PDT by Kickass Conservative (A day without Obama is like a day without a Tsunami.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: Kickass Conservative

You make comments about my views and I have every right to respond just as you do.

You can hit the abuse button all you want but it can be quickly seen there is no abuse. There is only a reply to your misguided and misleading comments.

For example you commented:
“You say Romney will lose against Obama. So what are you going to do about it?”

I have already addressed that question. I am going to support Tea Party conservatives in the House and Senate to block Obama whenever and wherever necessary in his second term.

If your Romney gets the nomination, I will stand back and watch him lose to Obama and I will work to take back my Party from the likes of this Liar.

If your man Romney does not get the requisite number of delegates to avoid a brokered convention, then I will support Newt and Santorum against Romney in doing whatever I can to evict him from my Party.

All of these sentiments have been expressed in posts to you before in addition to my opinion that you are a covert Romney supporter masquerading as a conservative in these forums.

122 posted on 04/16/2012 5:56:19 AM PDT by Hostage (Be Breitbart!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-5051-100101-122 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson