Former Vatican Ambassadors, pro-family advocates misrepresent Romney record on defense of marriage

Boston Catholic Insider ^ | 10 Jan 12 | BostonCatholic

[WOSG]

For the last 3 1/2 years we have had a Consititutionally ineligible, US hating, Marxist loving, usurping freak running the county and you think that “electing” 4 more years of that is anywhere close to acceptable?

Are you nuts?

[CommerceComet]

Mitt getting in just means I have to listen to people like you rag him for 4 years and I think I can deal with that.

Aren't you going to join the chorus in opposition to Romney's dumb policies once he's in office or have you completely adopted the GOP-e line that we can't criticize the R "leader"? I thought the story was that we're supposed to abandon our principles, vote for Romney, and then keep the pressure on him to toe the line? Hard to accomplish if you're not allowed to criticize him.

[little jeremiah]

Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

It's as though 0mugabe is the mayor of Sodom and Romney is the mayor of Gomorrah.

[EternalVigilance]

http://www.tomhoefling.com/index.html

http://www.selfgovernment.us/about.html

[EternalVigilance]

Dude, I got bigger stuff to worry about than homo marrying. I’m thinking about the end of America...

The destruction of the natural moral law foundations of the country and the fundamental governmental and economic unit of our civilization, the natural family, is the end of America.

You OK with helping Barry get another 4? Not me. It will be the end of the Republic.

"Republicans" who have nary a clue about what America even is are infinitely more dangerous to the survival of the Republic than Barack Obama will ever be. We have survived wicked politicians many, many times. But we cannot survive a citizenry with no principles left.

[West Texas Chuck]

OK, I completely cannot figure out what your point is.

I've said it before, and I'll say it again. I'll hold my nose and vote for Rmoney. Y'all can ask me all these goofy questions about homo marriages and whatever, I don't care. We have more to worry about here than a bunch of fags thinking they are married.

He ain't Obama. Can I make it any clearer?

I AIN'T VOTING FOR OBAMA.

If some of you feel better doing that, it is your business, I ain't onboard for that.

I AIN'T HELPING OBAMA, NO WAY, NO HOW.

If you are OK with helping Obamalamadingdong, then FU.

[West Texas Chuck]

"Republicans" who have nary a clue about what America even is are infinitely more dangerous to the survival of the Republic than Barack Obama will ever be."

OK, that is the dumbest damn thing I have ever heard. Do what your heart tells you, fool.

[kevcol]

Whats more preferable? Lets see:

Romney: for Ryan budget, against SSM, supports 2nd and NRA, lower tax rates, supports ‘self-deportation’, supports Roe v Wade overturn, will pass conservative Congress bills, vetoed hundreds of liberal bills as governor.

Obama: Socialist, for SSM,gun-grabbing “fast and furious”,big-gov, wants higher tax rates, spent $6 trillion in new debt,open borders,abortionist [D] who will stop conservative bills with his vetos.

While I think you are white-washing Willard at best, my point is that his election to POTUS permanently marginalizes Conservatives IMO, and sends the message to the GOP-e "no need to lie to Conservatives anymore, full speed ahead with evolvement". Its not so much a blind hatred for Willard as it is a hatred for those insideous traitors from within the GOP-e enabling and pushing this agenda. I'd rather see massive gridlock than the entire country lurching left. If Willard is elected (without my vote) I hope there are enough true Conservatives in Congress to offset the multitude of [D] crossover votes Willard will get to push his legislation. You know damn well that the GOP-e will point to Willards election (if that's the case) as a mandate for the whole party to "get on board" with agenda, and many [R] congress critters will eagerly jump.

[CommerceComet]

I was simply wanting to know WHEN is it going to be okay to criticize Romney? We can't do it now because people like you will claim that we're supporting Obama. If Romney gets elected, how many Romney supporters will claim that we have to let him have agenda because he won the election fair and square? If Romney gets elected, how many Romney supporters will claim that we can't criticize him now because that's just supporting Reid and Pelosi? Later in the first term, the Romney supporters will state we can't criticize him because we'll just be helping Hillary or whoever is the 2016 boogie man. So, once again, WHEN will it be okay to criticize Romney's dumb ideas?

How is Romney going to know that we conservatives are totally displeased with his RINO BS if we follow your advice and don't criticize? You think the GOP-e is going to tell him? If you blast Obama for his ideas but not Romney when his ideas are 90% of Obama's, are you not being a hypocrite? Conservatives should never be shy about criticizing bad ideas regardless of who holds them. The last people in the world who should protest about people criticizing Romney's liberal ideas are conservatives. Liberals shout down their opponents, conservatives shouldn't. Either conservative principles are worth fighting for or they aren't.

If you are OK with helping Obamalamadingdong, then FU.

I'm not helping Obama, however, I'll not help Romney, either. If that bothers you, I couldn't care less.

[icwhatudo]

"What is his position today despite his on-again-off-again support of gay marriage?"

Hi, me again. Just curious if you found that link yet where Romney has supported gay marriage?

[xzins]

You didn’t respond to my question about Romney.

Do you believe he is a conservative?

[xzins]

The letter by Dr. Titus in the article above proves that Romney supports gay marriage. He authorized it.

Also, Romney said yesterday that he supports “adoption by GAY COUPLES.”

Describe this “Gay Couple” that would adopt a child. Try the following on as Romney’s definition.

Then Romney also said, “I do not favor civil unions if they are identical to marriage other than by name.”

Romney says there that he supports Civil Unions being IDENTICAL in name to Marriage.

You say “civil union” and he hears “marriage”.

This is the “married” Gay Couple that he sees adopting children.

[icwhatudo]

I read the letter, from the link you provided that had a clip from Santorum at the debates. The letter says Romney did not have the power and that Santorum was right in the debates. In the debates, your own link shows Santorum saying Romney DID have the power. Color me confused, was he wrong about Santorum being right or was he wrong when he said Romney did not have the power?

Romney is, and has ALWAYS been against homosexual marriage. Yes, his positions have changed on a number of issues, but this is not one of them.

[xzins]

“gay couple” = what?

[Alamo-Girl]

Thank you for sharing your insights, dear brother in Christ!

[West Texas Chuck]

"I was simply wanting to know WHEN is it going to be okay to criticize Romney?"

Ummm, like every minute of every day.

I'm about through with you people treating me like I like the man. I don't, he is about my 10th choice for POTUS.

But I ain't sitting on my hands like so many here are prepared to do. I am voting, and I am voting for Anybody But Obama. Hell, get yer name on there and I'll vote for you.

Let me reiterate, if you prefer Obama to Rmoney, you are a damn fool and I will offer you no help when the SHTF. I could not care less either, about damn fools.