Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Sarah Palin wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney, she affirms it’s ANYBODY. BUT. OBAMA.
The Right Scoop ^ | June 20 2012 | The Right Scoop

Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone

Sarah Palin says that Obama did not respect the balance of power in the federal government when he issued his executive order last week on immigration, that he is now just telling Americans what he deems best by fiat. It was so blatant that she also suggested that we go back and talk to some of his former students because it’s clear Obama doesn’t understand our constitutional process.

She was also asked about criticism that she didn’t mention Romney in her speech at Right Online. But her reason was simple, that it would have violated the ground rules based on AFP’s legal status as a non-profit. But she makes very clear where she stands and said that if the vote were had today, she wouldn’t blink in voting for Romney over Obama and maintains she’s always held the position of anybody but Obama.

Watch below Video at link:


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: 2012election; election2012; kenyanbornmuzzie; mittromney; palin; romney; sarahpalin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 521-531 next last
To: nascarnation
“I am convinced that governor Romney, if he is our nominee and if he is elected president, he will know to surround himself with those that will inherently know to go right, to err on the side of smaller, smarter government and that gives me a lot of confidence.”

That's quite the ringing endorsement.

421 posted on 06/21/2012 12:26:52 PM PDT by j_tull (Massachusetts once lead the American Revolution. Under Mitt Romney, it lead the demise.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Good Lord, humble. I spent enough energy defending Palin to you to relieve our dependence on foreign oil.

And now I find myself agreeing with you some times.

What a world, what a world.


422 posted on 06/21/2012 12:28:11 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 409 | View Replies]

To: nutmeg

All conservatives really have no choice now but to vote ABO.


423 posted on 06/21/2012 12:29:29 PM PDT by Bigg Red (Pray for our republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 323 | View Replies]

To: altura
What a world, what a world.

A widely varied and wondrous place indeed.

424 posted on 06/21/2012 12:30:29 PM PDT by humblegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 422 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand

Did she say that about Newt? I thought she was for him.

My current problem is that I’m wondering what Obama would have to do to convince people on this particular thread to vote for Romney?

Apparently his issuing blanket job-related amnesty to illegals didn’t do it. (bypassing Congress)

Apparently his invoking executive privilege over the gun running scandal didn’t do it.

Maybe if he was on You Tube admitting he was homosexual?

Maybe if he ....

Okay, I give up. He’s done everything to drive people away from him but most of you people still want him.

I give up.


425 posted on 06/21/2012 12:35:33 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

The world is so full of a number of things,
I am sure we should all be as happy as kings.

(and we are)


426 posted on 06/21/2012 12:38:31 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 424 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand; altura

I don’t recall that at all, but I do remember her supporting Newt, saying she would vote for him during the primaries, and she said it several times. She never officially endorsed Newt, but it was pretty clear she favored him of all the candidates.


427 posted on 06/21/2012 12:38:42 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt, the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies]

To: altura

Don’t include me in that group. I want Obama out.


428 posted on 06/21/2012 12:39:47 PM PDT by Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Kinder Gentler Machinegun Hand

Me, Too. I cannot imagine anything more depressing than to watch election returns and see that traitorous, lying, nation destroying crook returned to office and given four years to complete his ruination of our country.

I was not speaking of everyone, of course.

But far too many are caught up in their own righteous indigation and virtuous hatred to see reality if it bit them in the butt.


429 posted on 06/21/2012 12:47:27 PM PDT by altura
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 428 | View Replies]

To: altura
My current problem is that I’m wondering what Obama would have to do to convince people on this particular thread to vote for Romney?

They would need to have Bambi:

Ruin the economy by putting on excess regulation, threaten companies that disagree with him, give money to only his donors from the federal treasury for their fake businesses, terrify the capital markets by threatening to raise taxes on eeeeeevil rich employers, force businesses to buy health insurance that is more expensive, then lie his ass off pretending he spends less and created more jobs than any president since Wasbhington.

Then he'd have to have to try to take over all of the health care for the entire nation, run our car companies, spend lots of money on "green jobs" that don't produce energy, try to ruin the coal industry, ruin the drilling possibilities in the gulf, force Canada to pipe their excess oil and gas to sell to other countries, start the movement to ban fracking, and then blame Bush for high gas prices.

Next he would claim he killed Osama with his bare hands, give a lot of security secrets to our enemies, force openly gay relationships on the military, try to reduce military benefits, cause massive hardships for the military with bad rules of engagement, pull out of Iraq in such a way to make the entire project become useless, make sure Iran didn't have any trouble from him in developing their nuclear project, take away some of the NATO defenses at Putin's request, etc.

He'd have to have an AG that was corrupt, that would not prosecute people of color even if they were guilty, then he'd have to sue AZ for their law that's identical to federal law, then he's have to allow illegals to stay and not send them home.....

Wait. Wait.......he did all that and more.

But above all, we'd better be pure and we'd better not vote for Romney, after all he's the same, so lets give Bambi four more years and see if he can be even worse, maybe even worse than Hugo Chavez......

Muahahahahahahaha. Muahahahahahahaha........

430 posted on 06/21/2012 12:59:11 PM PDT by Lakeshark (I don't care for Mitt, the alternative is unthinkable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 425 | View Replies]

To: Marcella

Marcella, please don’t let a couple of loudmouths chase you away. Don’t give them the satisfaction.


431 posted on 06/21/2012 1:21:27 PM PDT by CatherineofAragon (Time for a write-in campaign...Darryl Dixon for President)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 414 | View Replies]

To: Finny; wtc911
why you went to such devious lengths to knock Palin

Just like Mitt. Mitt has his mutts trained to obey.

432 posted on 06/21/2012 1:27:27 PM PDT by presently no screen name
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 399 | View Replies]

To: NoLibZone

I wouldn’t blink either. While I wish the republicans would’ve put forth a fully conservative candidate, the fact of the matter is that Obama must be thrown out in November. It’s a near-daily that there is a new assault on our liberties and stomping on the US constitution by the Obama administration

Like I said...I wish it were a more solid conservative. But I won’t not vote, I won’t vote for Ron Paul or throw my vote away on a write in. I will vote to GET RID of this man and his regime.

To those who want to chide me for posting this, feel free. I won’t be responding as I feel I have said nothing that needs defending.


433 posted on 06/21/2012 1:33:12 PM PDT by prairiebreeze (Don't be afraid to see what you see. -- Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

So true...and very sad.


434 posted on 06/21/2012 1:37:53 PM PDT by pgkdan (ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: ScreamingFist

Stupid troll most likely.


435 posted on 06/21/2012 1:40:42 PM PDT by pgkdan (ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Diogenesis

Grow the hell up.


436 posted on 06/21/2012 1:42:41 PM PDT by pgkdan (ANYBODY BUT OBAMA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Why don’t you two hug, kiss, and make up???

ROTFLMAO!
Don't recall reading those rules in my knife fighting handbook.

437 posted on 06/21/2012 1:53:54 PM PDT by The Cajun (Sarah Palin, Mark Levin......Nuff said.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 418 | View Replies]

To: humblegunner

Prediction: Mitt Romney will be well on his way to victory this fall...and then he’ll shake the Etch-A-Sketch.


438 posted on 06/21/2012 2:00:57 PM PDT by RichInOC (Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: prairiebreeze; All
As for me, I will take Ronald Reagan's wise advice in your tagline.

I see that:

1. Obama is so loathed by Americans, including Democrats, that his approval numbers are downright pathetic, which means that this election, he will not get remotely as many votes as he did the last time; many former Obama voters will either not vote or will vote third party.

2. Romney has an established record of actively advancing and promoting the FIVE major liberal agendas of global warming, government-run health care, the homosexual agenda, activist judges, and abortion, and has governned always like a liberal Democrat. He remains proud of RomneyCare, is all for the global warming agenda of restricting and regulating food and energy production and kow-towing to a global "solution rather than an American one" (his CPAC speech of '08), and the "right" of homosexuals to adopt children, more accurately, the government's right to force adoption agencies to cooperate.

I see that this election, by the grace of God, is such that circumstances greatly favor a very low vote turnout for Obama, which means that a deliberate attempt by conservatives to split the vote at the top of the ticket by voting third party and rejecting liberal statist Romney would have an excellent chance of making it so whichever guy wins regardless of the electoral college count, Obama or Romney, enters office on a plurality of a little more than one third of the popular vote -- opposed by nearly two out of every three voters. THAT would be good for conservatives no matter which amoral statist, Romney or Obama, won.

Two potential disasters still lurk:

1. Democrats crawfish and nominate someone other than Obama before November, a "blank slate" on whom Democrats could project all the new "hope and change" they wanted.

2. Romney winning by a landslide, which would not only silence conservative Republicans and opposition to liberalism for the forseeable future, but strengthen moderate Republicans and ensure the advance of authoritarian amoral statism as consistently promoted by Romney.

My priorities at this point are not ABO, because a plurality win in the 38 - 40% range would make him a mockery, but to prevent Romney from winning in a landslide. I'm not afraid to see what I see -- whereas ABOers are terrified not only of Obama, but of looking eye-to-eye at what Romney truly portends.

439 posted on 06/21/2012 2:12:05 PM PDT by Finny (A deal with the devil is ALWAYS a losing proposition. Voting for Romney to avoid Obama is just that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 433 | View Replies]

To: pgkdan
pgkdan: "Grow the hell up."

Is that a euphemism that you support Romney's Egotism?
or Romney's Backstabbing?
or Romney's antiConstitutionalism?
or Romney's Ineptness?
or Romney's RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE?
or Romney's TARP?
or Romney's Ineligibility?
or Romney's Global Warming?
or Romney's TAXES (Mr. RomneyCARE calls them 'fees')?
or Romney's HATRED OF CONSERVATIVES?

or why dont you admit all of the above.

440 posted on 06/21/2012 2:27:52 PM PDT by Diogenesis ("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 436 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 401-420421-440441-460 ... 521-531 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson