Posted on 06/20/2012 4:34:56 PM PDT by NoLibZone
That's quite the ringing endorsement.
Good Lord, humble. I spent enough energy defending Palin to you to relieve our dependence on foreign oil.
And now I find myself agreeing with you some times.
What a world, what a world.
All conservatives really have no choice now but to vote ABO.
A widely varied and wondrous place indeed.
Did she say that about Newt? I thought she was for him.
My current problem is that I’m wondering what Obama would have to do to convince people on this particular thread to vote for Romney?
Apparently his issuing blanket job-related amnesty to illegals didn’t do it. (bypassing Congress)
Apparently his invoking executive privilege over the gun running scandal didn’t do it.
Maybe if he was on You Tube admitting he was homosexual?
Maybe if he ....
Okay, I give up. He’s done everything to drive people away from him but most of you people still want him.
I give up.
The world is so full of a number of things,
I am sure we should all be as happy as kings.
(and we are)
I don’t recall that at all, but I do remember her supporting Newt, saying she would vote for him during the primaries, and she said it several times. She never officially endorsed Newt, but it was pretty clear she favored him of all the candidates.
Don’t include me in that group. I want Obama out.
Me, Too. I cannot imagine anything more depressing than to watch election returns and see that traitorous, lying, nation destroying crook returned to office and given four years to complete his ruination of our country.
I was not speaking of everyone, of course.
But far too many are caught up in their own righteous indigation and virtuous hatred to see reality if it bit them in the butt.
They would need to have Bambi:
Ruin the economy by putting on excess regulation, threaten companies that disagree with him, give money to only his donors from the federal treasury for their fake businesses, terrify the capital markets by threatening to raise taxes on eeeeeevil rich employers, force businesses to buy health insurance that is more expensive, then lie his ass off pretending he spends less and created more jobs than any president since Wasbhington.
Then he'd have to have to try to take over all of the health care for the entire nation, run our car companies, spend lots of money on "green jobs" that don't produce energy, try to ruin the coal industry, ruin the drilling possibilities in the gulf, force Canada to pipe their excess oil and gas to sell to other countries, start the movement to ban fracking, and then blame Bush for high gas prices.
Next he would claim he killed Osama with his bare hands, give a lot of security secrets to our enemies, force openly gay relationships on the military, try to reduce military benefits, cause massive hardships for the military with bad rules of engagement, pull out of Iraq in such a way to make the entire project become useless, make sure Iran didn't have any trouble from him in developing their nuclear project, take away some of the NATO defenses at Putin's request, etc.
He'd have to have an AG that was corrupt, that would not prosecute people of color even if they were guilty, then he'd have to sue AZ for their law that's identical to federal law, then he's have to allow illegals to stay and not send them home.....
Wait. Wait.......he did all that and more.
But above all, we'd better be pure and we'd better not vote for Romney, after all he's the same, so lets give Bambi four more years and see if he can be even worse, maybe even worse than Hugo Chavez......
Muahahahahahahaha. Muahahahahahahaha........
Marcella, please don’t let a couple of loudmouths chase you away. Don’t give them the satisfaction.
Just like Mitt. Mitt has his mutts trained to obey.
I wouldn’t blink either. While I wish the republicans would’ve put forth a fully conservative candidate, the fact of the matter is that Obama must be thrown out in November. It’s a near-daily that there is a new assault on our liberties and stomping on the US constitution by the Obama administration
Like I said...I wish it were a more solid conservative. But I won’t not vote, I won’t vote for Ron Paul or throw my vote away on a write in. I will vote to GET RID of this man and his regime.
To those who want to chide me for posting this, feel free. I won’t be responding as I feel I have said nothing that needs defending.
So true...and very sad.
Stupid troll most likely.
Grow the hell up.
ROTFLMAO!
Don't recall reading those rules in my knife fighting handbook.
Prediction: Mitt Romney will be well on his way to victory this fall...and then he’ll shake the Etch-A-Sketch.
I see that:
1. Obama is so loathed by Americans, including Democrats, that his approval numbers are downright pathetic, which means that this election, he will not get remotely as many votes as he did the last time; many former Obama voters will either not vote or will vote third party.
2. Romney has an established record of actively advancing and promoting the FIVE major liberal agendas of global warming, government-run health care, the homosexual agenda, activist judges, and abortion, and has governned always like a liberal Democrat. He remains proud of RomneyCare, is all for the global warming agenda of restricting and regulating food and energy production and kow-towing to a global "solution rather than an American one" (his CPAC speech of '08), and the "right" of homosexuals to adopt children, more accurately, the government's right to force adoption agencies to cooperate.
I see that this election, by the grace of God, is such that circumstances greatly favor a very low vote turnout for Obama, which means that a deliberate attempt by conservatives to split the vote at the top of the ticket by voting third party and rejecting liberal statist Romney would have an excellent chance of making it so whichever guy wins regardless of the electoral college count, Obama or Romney, enters office on a plurality of a little more than one third of the popular vote -- opposed by nearly two out of every three voters. THAT would be good for conservatives no matter which amoral statist, Romney or Obama, won.
Two potential disasters still lurk:
1. Democrats crawfish and nominate someone other than Obama before November, a "blank slate" on whom Democrats could project all the new "hope and change" they wanted.
2. Romney winning by a landslide, which would not only silence conservative Republicans and opposition to liberalism for the forseeable future, but strengthen moderate Republicans and ensure the advance of authoritarian amoral statism as consistently promoted by Romney.
My priorities at this point are not ABO, because a plurality win in the 38 - 40% range would make him a mockery, but to prevent Romney from winning in a landslide. I'm not afraid to see what I see -- whereas ABOers are terrified not only of Obama, but of looking eye-to-eye at what Romney truly portends.
Is that a euphemism that you support Romney's Egotism?
or Romney's Backstabbing?
or Romney's antiConstitutionalism?
or Romney's Ineptness?
or Romney's RomneyCARE/ObamaCARE?
or Romney's TARP?
or Romney's Ineligibility?
or Romney's Global Warming?
or Romney's TAXES (Mr. RomneyCARE calls them 'fees')?
or Romney's HATRED OF CONSERVATIVES?
or why dont you admit all of the above.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.