Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Liberal Moderators:We're NOT Gonna Take It! (UPDATED) (action alert)
The Red Side of Life Conservative Musings from New York ^ | 8/14/12 | RedInNewYork

Posted on 08/14/2012 12:08:08 PM PDT by jmstein7

Unless you've had your head in the sand, you already know the ultra-liberal slate of moderators selected for the presidential debates... and this cannot stand:

The ABC moderator chosen for the vice presidential debate in Danville, Ky., on Oct. 11 of this year will be the network's Chief Foreign Correspondent, Martha Raddatz.

 Jim Lehrer, of PBS, will ask the questions at the first presidential debate, which is Oct. 3 in Denver. Next comes CNN’s Candy Crowley, who will pick questioners at a town hall-style event in Hempstead, N.Y. on Oct. 16. Bringing up the rear will be veteran CBS reporter Bob Schieffer, who will host the final debate in Boca Raton, Fla., on Oct. 22. It sounds like a great lineup … provided you’re the Democratic candidate.

HT to the Examiner.

The good news is that my personal sources indicate that the RNC is indeed evaluating a challenge. However, they are going to need a solid push to make the right decision. Therefore, I strongly urge you to do all of the following - as there is nothing like massive direct contact... this is a four-pronged strategy... please do ALL FOUR:


I cannot emphasize how important it is to take action now; the debates are probably the most watched events of the election season. If you don't do your part, then you're part of the problem.

Obama's "Mod Squad"


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: jmstein7

“The person who answered the phone told me they have nothing to do with the decision, and advised me to contact the “non-partisan” Commission on Presidential Debates...”

Absolutely correct. They can decline to do the debate with hostile moderators.

Wouldn’t the Republicans have a better chance of winning with no debate at all rather than a one sided spin session DESIGNED to make us look bad?


21 posted on 08/14/2012 3:33:26 PM PDT by Advil000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Batman11; jmstein7
Breitbart needs to put together a nice long video of these phony biased “journalists” spewing their love for Bozo and hate for the GOP/Tea Party/Conservatives. Use it as a commercial. Run it over and over. Then Romney needs tell these enemy networks that we are not showing up for their Obama but-kissing dog and pony show, the same way he refused to attend the Fox moderated Rat primary debate!! Stop playing by the SRM’s rules and letting them frame the debate. Tell them to screw off and why! I am so sick of this crap and the SRM.

That's it exactly. It will take tens of thousands of us, maybe more, to do what Mittens could do single-handedly and with no effort at all. Simply tell his staff to get it done, call a presser and tell the people why.

Will MR do it or is he "part of the problem"?

22 posted on 08/14/2012 3:46:27 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Advil000

FOUR hostile spin sessions.


23 posted on 08/14/2012 3:49:56 PM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Advil000
Wouldn’t the Republicans have a better chance of winning with no debate at all rather than a one sided spin session DESIGNED to make us look bad?

You're damn straight they would. The 'debates' will do nothing but feed great talking points for the lib media from one debate to the next. Screw 'em!

24 posted on 08/14/2012 3:51:50 PM PDT by houeto (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

Bump


25 posted on 08/14/2012 3:54:39 PM PDT by BulletBobCo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: houeto

You are correct. To let our enemies moderate the debates is suicidal.


26 posted on 08/14/2012 4:41:25 PM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Wildbill22

Limbaugh can’t be a moderator because he’s not a journalist. I don’t know Levin’s background. But Fox has a lot of journalists, any one of whom would be great. Why isn’t Fox hosting any of those debates?


27 posted on 08/14/2012 5:31:33 PM PDT by RepublicOfUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jmstein7

After these debates with the liberal moderators, who do you think will be declared the ‘winner’?

Just say “NO”.


28 posted on 08/14/2012 8:12:44 PM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RepublicOfUSA; All

Say that was the case. Does anyone think the libs wouldn’t be screaming bloody murder?

GOP... Just say NO!


29 posted on 08/15/2012 5:53:52 AM PDT by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson