Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: mamelukesabre
They would over run africa first. Africa has raw materials and slave-like labor and lots of ground for farming.

Wow, I never even thought of that! It is hard to imagine Africa as having enough resources to be worth taking militarily given their lifestyle.

Keep in mind, I was going to have Europe be taken over without a shot being fired. It seems to me that they are welcoming a Muslim takeover via immigration.

At any rate, Africa just made it into the book. I was just going to use Egypt, but that would be a poor use of MY resources.

21 posted on 08/24/2012 3:45:36 PM PDT by America_Right (Remember, Republicans have a lot more in common with Democrats than they do with Tea Partiers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: America_Right

european colonists didn’t take over africa because it was a waste of time. They colonized africa because there are rich lands there and no one with the organization talent to extract them.


22 posted on 08/24/2012 3:54:44 PM PDT by mamelukesabre
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson