Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Debate #2 is a setup
http://www.stink-eye.net/forum/index.php ^ | 10/05/12 | vanity

Posted on 10/05/2012 7:22:46 PM PDT by JohnBrowdie

we are going to get screwed in the second debate. the obamites are desperate.

it's a town hall meeting. they will stack the deck in the audience with 26 year old lesbians with breast cancer that need their birth control pills paid for.

"how can you take my obamacare away from meeeee? I will die!!"

candy is an absolute leftist, and she is listening to the MSM uproar over the last debate. she will whack mitt at every opportunity in the next debate.


TOPICS: Politics
KEYWORDS: 2012debates; blogpimp; debates; romney; stinkeyesucks; test; vanity; victims
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last
To: Tea Party Terrorist
But why would a lesbian need birth control pills

I could answer but it would be extremely inappropriate for FR.

41 posted on 10/05/2012 7:51:46 PM PDT by libh8er
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I think you are probably 100% correct


42 posted on 10/05/2012 7:53:28 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: randita

“I guess you haven’t heard that Candy’s out.”

Candy needs to change her name to salad!


43 posted on 10/05/2012 7:53:53 PM PDT by Batman11 (We came for the chicken sandwiches and a Sweet Tea Party broke out!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kenny

And ask if Obamacare’s not raising taxes why they’ve already hired 10,000 new IRS agents.

That would be a great response from Romney...lol

And why all the ramping up with police state technology, equipment and firepower


44 posted on 10/05/2012 7:55:59 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Romney has already demonstrated he thinks on his feet WAY better than Obama, and because a townhall format is going to be more volatile than having the moderator run the whole show, Romney should be in a better position than Obama from that perspective.

Also, consider that Romney should be going into this debate with some confidence due to his first knockout performance, and Obama is going to probably be way more nervous due to his earlier terrible performance and the fact that he’s under even more pressure than the first debate because the stakes for him are even higher this time since he did so badly the first time.

I suspect that Mitt has figured out how to get under Obama’s skin, and that unlike Obama, Mitt can control his emotions. I think part of Obama’s problem is that he probably can’t control his emotions and the resulting internal turmoil of trying to appear calm while he is internally seething greatly interferes with his thinking ability.

I’ve also wondered if part of Obama’s awful performance is because his internal polls show he’s going to lose re-election and yet he is still being forced into the humiliation of these debates in which he faces an opponent who is smarter and more capable than himself. Romney on the other hand may already know he’s probably going to be the next President, and is therefore may be acting accordingly.

During these debates, Obama is totally on his own without the adoring handpicked crowds, the worshiping press, total control over everyone else in the room because he’s “The President”, and someone to whisper all the answers in his ear. Obama really is an empty suit, and that’s not going to change from the first debate either, so I’m not expecting Obama to be that much better in the subsequent debates. It wouldn’t surprise me if he’s even worse than the first time.


45 posted on 10/05/2012 7:57:58 PM PDT by catnipman (Cat Nipman: Vote Republican in 2012 and only be called racist one more time!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Heart of Georgia

“I thought the next debate is on foreign policy.”

Yeah, I thought that too. You see, even for dedicated Freepers like ourselves it’s hard to keep up!

Evidently the next “debate” is really a Town Hall format and the Third Debate will be on Foreign Policy.

So, Romney needs to prep with some group of random lefties for the next one. And you know what, I wouldn’t put it past him to do just that.

Besides, some ad they ran and focus-grouped, where he talks directly to the camera tested real well with women, so he should feel confident.

He’s a NICE GUY, Romney is. Some here have major problems with him, politically, but by most operative standards he’s a NICE GUY.

Obama is NOT a Nice Guy, at best he’s a raving ego-maniac. They say Nice Guys finish last, but in a group people like them. And NOBODY likes a raving ego-maniac.

Advantage: Romney.


46 posted on 10/05/2012 7:59:20 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rktman

“I see that “Gallup” (the poll people?) is going to select the participants”

That’s good. Thanks for posting that. I trust them well enough.


47 posted on 10/05/2012 8:01:42 PM PDT by jocon307
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist
For when the turkey baster doesn't use any protection.
48 posted on 10/05/2012 8:05:48 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And that's the end of our show! Doink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie
LOL!
Just guessing here...none of your past work experiences involved any privately owned, non-government, non-union sector jobs.

Am I correct?

49 posted on 10/05/2012 8:06:00 PM PDT by sarasmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jocon307

The town hall is foreign and domestic and the third one is foreign policy


50 posted on 10/05/2012 8:07:15 PM PDT by morphing libertarian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

I will be shocked if someone in the audience doesn’t CRY while questioning 0bama.


51 posted on 10/05/2012 8:07:55 PM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jsanders2001

-Mr Obama, why did you say to the Russian Prime Minister that you had to wait until after the election to have “flexibility”? What would you do to cause an effect on the election that the American people would oppose in an agreement with a -maybe- former mortal enemy? Treason?

-Why didn’t you take the intelligence briefings warning of the threats to safety of our Ambassador three other dead Americans?

-You came to office claiming to make other countries love and respect us again. Given the spread of Islamic extremism in the middle east, the attacks on our Embassies and people, the burning in effigy of images of yourself and the American flag in dozens of countries, are we if fact better off internationally than we were four years ago?


52 posted on 10/05/2012 8:08:15 PM PDT by Wildbill22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist
For when the turkey baster doesn't use any protection.
53 posted on 10/05/2012 8:09:25 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And that's the end of our show! Doink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie; a fool in paradise

Debate on foreign policy is townhall with cretins lining up to axe questions displaying their ignorance which the candidates will not be allowed to expose? NFG!


54 posted on 10/05/2012 8:09:42 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Man up dude. This isn’t Tiddly Winks...


55 posted on 10/05/2012 8:10:04 PM PDT by wireman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tea Party Terrorist
But why would a lesbian need birth control pills?

LOL!

"Look, look...that's...sigh...that's not the point, ok...?"

56 posted on 10/05/2012 8:11:04 PM PDT by Future Snake Eater (CrossFit.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie

Romney as reported in the WSJ, today or yesterday, runs a tight ship preparing for these debates. Discipline and no yesmen there.


57 posted on 10/05/2012 8:11:41 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Bad things are wrong!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnBrowdie
>"candy is an absolute leftist,"

And the perfect name for some one interviewing the "candy man".

Who gave us 0bama ph0nes?

Filled em up for free?

58 posted on 10/05/2012 8:12:45 PM PDT by rawcatslyentist ("Behold, I am against you, O arrogant one," Jeremiah 50:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RushIsMyTeddyBear
Third debate is FoPo. Second debate is that dumb@ss townhall format, some dude with a ponytail will no doubt ask them both to play National DadTM treat us like children and be nice to each other.
59 posted on 10/05/2012 8:13:42 PM PDT by FredZarguna (And that's the end of our show! Doink.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

“26 year old lesbians with breast cancer that need their birth control pills paid for.”

Why would lesbians need birth control pills???????????????????


60 posted on 10/05/2012 8:13:58 PM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-120 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson