she was wrong, and still no one plays the rose garden from the beginning to see bambi was really talking about 9-11-01
Let them eat arsenic.
Technically she was right, but she conceded the substance of Romney’s argument in her very next breath. But these debate circuses are all style over substance so the gotcha moment in Obama’s favor is all the general public will remember.
He really believed that obummer killed it last night just because he showed up.
chrissy wants to lewinsky obama.
Not surprising that gets it 100% bass ackwards.
Mitt’s takeaway is great material for pressing the FACTS in evidence on Benghazi. And FACTS are troublesome things for liars.
Does anyone really believe Obama did not have the questions in advance and the plan was for Candy to do just what she did? Obama the Zero saved by the women, Candy and Hillary.
>>but you know what she wasn’t wrong. She’s a reporter.
These people on TV are reporters? LOL.
SHE WAS F-IN WRONG/
sorry but I’ve had it with their lies and B/S.
These last two debates have seen two moderators so biased and let Biden and obama say just crap and they never shut up.\\The questions were awful, so lets have those who do not knwo who to vote for down here in SC, or AL, MS and lets see how the questions are different
Last night's format, venue and moderator facilitator was astoundingly detrimental to Mitt Romney (and in fairness, to any Republican), yet he was still able to do well. Nevertheless, the abject willingness to roll over for the opposition in setting up these "debates" has reached the point where Alan Simpson and John Danforth need to be sent to the political glue factory by the GOP.
Mr. niteowl77
This was a planned setup and the STUPID Party fell for it.
hey crisssy it’s early....
It was wrong for her to come down one way or another on it. I can't believe there is any perception of proper conduct on her part.
1 then what was the video tape story all about? And
2 why would you then run off to Las Vegas for a fund raiser rather than gathering the security council?
he digs his hole deeper and Candy handed him a better shovel.
She has now admitted that she WAS wrong, Sissy Matthews. So let’s see you go after her.
Once again, the left and especially the state-run government-media complex have to compensate for the incompetence of the affirmative-action president.
Romney killed the Marxist on the economy and deficits. Libya is down the list of issues that matter to the mushy undecideds. But there is no way Obama can “win” on this issue, as the facts are the facts. An ambassador is DEAD, and Obama and his sociopathic minions all lied. Further, the next debate is all foreign policy, and Romney (hopefully) will set the record straight in very clear terms:
1. Security was asked for.
2. It was not received.
3. An ambassador and 3 others were brutally killed.
4. You blamed a video. Your minions blamed a video. On TV and to the UN.
5. Against all evidence that was in your hands you never called it a terrorist attack until weeks later.
6. Your foreign policy is based on illusion and deception, and fails to recognize the realities of the world. Al Qaeda and its derivatives are quite alive and well.
On each item, like speeches before the coffins, order to lower flags to half mast, etc., the word "terror" (or "terrorism") only appears in that one generic statement made from the Rose Garden - and I don;t think Obama wants to say that he jumped to the conclusion it was terrorism, when the administration line was that investigation had to be done.
Crowley was wrong but the press is carrying her water.
Truth is meaningless to Hissy Matthews. He’s been saying for two weeks that unemployment was ten percent when Bush left office. The truth is that it was a less than seven percent at the time, but Tingles just keeps doubling down on the wrong figure because he knows the ignorant proletariat that is his audience will believe it. Thankfully they’re a very small bunch.
Crowley said afterwards that she was wrong. All the fine “journalists” and “analysts” on MSNBC were wrong. Why does anyone listen to these people as a source of information?