Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ayn Rand Really, Really Hated C.S. Lewis
First Things ^ | March 27, 2013 | Matthew Schmitz

Posted on 05/11/2013 12:12:17 PM PDT by JerseyanExile

Ayn Rand was no fan of C.S. Lewis. She called the famous apologist an “abysmal bastard,” a “monstrosity,” a “cheap, awful, miserable, touchy, social-meta­physical mediocrity,” a “pickpocket of concepts,” and a “God-damn, beaten mystic.” (I suspect Lewis would have particularly relished the last of these.)

These insults and more can be found in her marginal notes on a copy of Lewis’ Abolition of Man, as printed in Ayn Rand’s Marginalia: Her critical comments on the writings of over 20 authors, edited by Robert Mayhew. Excerpts appear below, with Lewis’ writing (complete with Rand’s highlighting and underlining) on the left and Rand’s notes on the right.

(Excerpt) Read more at firstthings.com ...


TOPICS: Religion; Science; Society
KEYWORDS: abolitionofman; atheism; atheists; aynrand; cslewis; cslewismysticism; evilwoman; lewis; libertarians; magic; medicalmarijuana; misquoting; objectivism; pages; rand; randians; science; tao; theology
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-179 next last
To: OldNavyVet

Because God, who created us, has a mind far greater than ours.

Rand was apparently unable to see this.


121 posted on 05/12/2013 7:20:20 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: goodwithagun

They may be leftists, but if they have access to sense and reason then it’s possible to help them understand how their errors in political ideology come from the same source as their wrongful view of God.


122 posted on 05/12/2013 7:20:30 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: BCrago66

Whenever an exchange of ideas becomes a debate, strife between persons often takes over and truth is obscured.

With good will, hoping the Good Lord guides me in speaking truthfully to you, I tell you I believe the ideology of naturalism is inevitably refuted simply by thinking harder about it.


123 posted on 05/12/2013 7:29:14 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 93 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah
there is no scientific truth of evolution.

Darwin's "The Origin of Species" was updated in 1999 by Steve Jones, in a book titled "Darwin's Ghost."

Consider these book reviews.

"AN EXTRAORDINARY RIDE THROUGH DARWINISM, YESTERDAY AND TODAY. Jones is the in the premier league of what appears to be a new breed - brilliant scientists able and eager to share their writtten erudition with the rest of us." -- The Guardian (Book of the Year)"

"Jones has rewritten Darrin's narrative with the help of the latest insights from evolutional biology ... Adopting the rich anectodotal style much favored by Darwin, but seasoning it with a good dose of the sardonic humor that readers will recognize from Jone's previous books, Jone demonstrates how completely modern biology has vindicated Darwin's claims." --The New York Times Book Review."

Adding to that, the book has glowing reviews from six other prominent publications.

I'd recommend those reading this to read Jones's book. Jones's book is loaded with scientific fact and my wish to everyone is ... Happy Reading!

124 posted on 05/12/2013 9:20:30 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 115 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

Interesting you should choose two of the world’s most left wing news sheets to promote a book on THIS website.


125 posted on 05/12/2013 9:24:49 AM PDT by EDINVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

No thanks, I prefer to read Behe, Richard Milton and Phillip Johnson, thankyouverymuch.


126 posted on 05/12/2013 9:35:55 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
As Tolkien wrote of the Barrow-wights in The Fellowship of the Ring, this is "the cold cursing the warmth for which it hungered."

Cheers!

127 posted on 05/12/2013 9:49:42 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: saganite
You apparently haven’t read Atlas Shrugged and have no idea what the plot entails.

Where's Galt's Gulch, then?

128 posted on 05/12/2013 9:51:59 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: F15Eagle
There are two novels that can change a bookish fourteen-year old's life: The Lord of the Rings and Atlas Shrugged. One is a childish fantasy that often engenders a lifelong obsession with its unbelievable heroes, leading to an emotionally stunted, socially crippled adulthood, unable to deal with the real world. The other, of course, involves orcs. -- John Rogers, quoted at the head of Wikipedia's Ayn Rand page.

Cheers!

129 posted on 05/12/2013 9:52:52 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
The Earth, for instance, came into being about 4.6 billion years ago, long before Jesus appeared ... prompting a question. Why did God wait so long to send humans (and only humans) a savior?

You've got the cart by the wrong end. Why did He bother at all?

Your problem is that you are implicitly applying an intrinsically mechanistic, "engineering" approach to things, and limiting your consideration to (otherwise irrelevant) material considerations, without allowing for the possibility that God had other priorities or considerations, to which we are not privy; nor yet again that there may be legitimate *spiritual* secrets which we have neither the ability to comprehend, nor the right to know.

Just because the Obama administration abuses government power, and lies to cover their sorry ass, does not imply that ALL authority is similarly corrupt.

Cheers! Cheers!

130 posted on 05/12/2013 9:58:46 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: JSDude1

It’s based on some irrationality, an imperfection we can all identify with. Some superstition thrown in as well, some fear of the unknown, etc. We’re works in progress.


131 posted on 05/12/2013 10:00:46 AM PDT by Telepathic Intruder (The only thing the Left has learned from the failures of socialism is not to call it that)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Very good analysis. Thanks.


132 posted on 05/12/2013 10:01:05 AM PDT by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 127 | View Replies]

To: betty boop
Ayn Rand had a bolt loose.

She reminds me of this passage from Out of the Silent Planet:



"I see now how the lord of the silent world has bent you. There are laws that all hnau know, of pity and straight dealing and shame and the like, and one of these is the love of kindred. He has taught you to break all of them except this one, which is not one of the greatest laws; this one he has bent till it becomes folly and has set it up, thus bent, to be a little, blind Oyarsa in your brain. And now you can do nothing but obey it, though if we ask you why it is a law you can give no other reason for it than for all the other and greater laws which it drives you to disobey. Do you know why he has done this?"

"Me think no such person - me wise, new man - no believe all that old talk."

"I will tell you. He has left you this one because a bent hnau can do more evil than a broken one. He has only bent you; but this Thin One who sits on the ground he has broken, for he has left him nothing but greed. He is now only a talking animal and in my world he could do no more evil than an animal. If he were mine I would unmake his body, for the hnau in it is already dead. But if you were mine I would try to cure you. Tell me, Thick One, why did you come here?"

Cheers!

133 posted on 05/12/2013 10:02:10 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
Consider that line stolen as of now.

Cheers!

134 posted on 05/12/2013 10:03:12 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

FReepmail.


135 posted on 05/12/2013 10:15:47 AM PDT by grey_whiskers (The opinions are solely those of the author and are subject to change without notice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: reasonisfaith
Because God, who created us, has a mind far greater than ours.

A mind, in one way or another, seems to be present in every living thing; even if only to maintain life ... as in every bacteria in existence; and we're somewhat related to those bacteria.

Jones writes this: "About a thousand genes are shared by every organism, however simple or complicated. Although their common ancestor must have lived more than a billion years ago, their shared structure can still be glimpsed. It shows how the grand plan of evolution has been modified through the course of evolution.

Jones goes on to write: "One set of genes is found everywhere. It translates the information coded in the DNA and allows it to make proteins. The job is so essential that such structures changed little over millions of years."

136 posted on 05/12/2013 10:27:02 AM PDT by OldNavyVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet
" Jones writes this: "About a thousand genes are shared by every organism, however simple or complicated. Although their common ancestor must have lived more than a billion years ago, their shared structure can still be glimpsed. It shows how the grand plan of evolution has been modified through the course of evolution. Jones goes on to write: "One set of genes is found everywhere. It translates the information coded in the DNA and allows it to make proteins. The job is so essential that such structures changed little over millions of years.""

Virtually every building in my town is made of wood. Does this mean the houses on 12th St. evolved from the houses over on 4th St., or simply that some building materials work better than others and an intelligent builder will have a propensity to employ them?

137 posted on 05/12/2013 11:21:43 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Qui me amat, amat et canem meum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: OldNavyVet

The existence of shared genes among different species is logically, but not empirically, consistent with a Darwinian type of evolution and shared origins.

But it is also consistent logically with divine creation.


138 posted on 05/12/2013 11:24:05 AM PDT by reasonisfaith ("...because they received not the love of the truth, that they might be saved." (2 Thessalonians))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies]

To: EDINVA

It’s pare for the coures. Check posting history. So leftist it runs around in circles.


139 posted on 05/12/2013 11:24:31 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 125 | View Replies]

To: grey_whiskers

Excellent comments! I love CS Lewis’ books, wish I had more of them.


140 posted on 05/12/2013 11:26:30 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 133 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160161-179 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson