Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Lindsey Graham Likely to Face Several Primary Challengers (force a runoff!)
breitbart.com ^ | 7/28/13 | Michael Patrick Leahy

Posted on 07/29/2013 5:14:31 AM PDT by cotton1706

Lindsey Graham, who already has one announced challenger in the 2014 South Carolina Republican primary for the United States Senate in businessman Richard Cash, may soon face two more challengers. Both State Senator Lee Bright and Nancy Mace, the first female graduate of the Citadel, are preparing to enter the race soon, according to The Daily Beast.

Graham's allies recently publicly stated they expect he will face multiple challengers. On July 23, former South Carolina Republican Party Chairman Katon Dawson, who runs a Super PAC that supports Graham, the West Main Street Values Fund, told the Washington Examiner that Graham "will face a 'spirited' and 'competitive' primary challenge."

Dawson, however, expects Graham to prevail. "Senator Graham has been one of the most successful politicians at the ballot box and has cut the hide of a South Florida alligator when it comes to campaigns and elections," he said.

In addition to friendly Super PACs and a strong network of supporters in the South Carolina Republican establishment at the state and county levels, the Graham campaign has $6.3 million cash on hand. In contrast, Richard Cash, his only announced opponent, had only $248,396 in cash on hand as of June 30, according to Federal Election Commission records.

Tea Party groups across the state unanimously oppose Graham. They view him as a RINO who does not support the constitutionally limited government values of the movement. However, to date they have not coalesced around a single challenger.

Cash has courted the Tea Party movement but has yet to close the deal. On Thursday, he spoke to the Sumter Tea Party, where he received a pleasant reception, But Cash's campaign theme of what he calls the three Cs—"capitalism, Christianity, and the Constitution"—has yet to generate the type of Tea Party enthusiasm he hoped to achieve.

(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: lindseygrahamprimary
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: Alas Babylon!
I wouldn’t doubt that several are on his payroll...

Exactly. Of the three mentioned in this article, Lee Bright clearly is the best and the only one with any prospect of beating Graham.

Mace is a partner of the discredited Will Folks and his FITS news. Cash is a no-name.

21 posted on 07/29/2013 7:27:04 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: wideawake
If the opposition does not rally behind a single candidate, Graham will win.

Yep. And, of those mentioned, only Lee Bright has any chance at all.

22 posted on 07/29/2013 7:43:37 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
This shows the need for a New Party. There is only a small chance, if any, to defeat Sen. Graham in a Republican Primary. With a New Party, there is entry into the general election, and in the chaos of todays world, a reasonable chance to either get elected or bring about real positive chance in the existing process.
I hope to read more on FR about this race.
TWB
23 posted on 07/29/2013 7:49:37 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear

“This shows the need for a New Party”

Are you going to start the New Party? Why not?


24 posted on 07/29/2013 7:58:08 AM PDT by spel_grammer_an_punct_polise (Learn three chords and you, too, can be a Rock Star!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Mace is a partner of the discredited Will Folks and his FITS news.

Wow. Your long-distance vision from Ohio is mighty keen. Other than the Columbia powers-that-be and the LSM and YOU, just who did the discrediting and how? And Nancy Mace is not a valid candidate for U.S.Senate because of her association with someone you say has been discredited.

Nancy Mace will be a much stronger candidate when South Carolinians learn more about her views and her life.
25 posted on 07/29/2013 8:03:21 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: spel_grammer_an_punct_polise
‘“This shows the need for a New Party”

Are you going to start the New Party? Why not?

Actually, a better question is ‘How is a New Party coming along?
So far, so good. It is great to get responses from folks on the internet. It raises the visibility of a New Party every time they post. For those who live in South Carolina, this election is a big opportunity to do something good for their State and the Nation.
TWB

26 posted on 07/29/2013 8:11:00 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero; C. Edmund Wright
... long-distance vision from Ohio ... someone you say has been discredited.

I would suggest that the governor of South Carolina, and ALL those SC residents who voted for her, likewise discredit Will 'FitsNews' Folks ...


27 posted on 07/29/2013 8:19:03 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: TWhiteBear
Here are some links for Sen. Lee Bright.http://www.rightsidenews.com/2013072832962/us/politics/sen-lee-bright-interview-watch-out-graham-bright-may-be-the-answer-for-true-s-c-conservatives.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lee_Bright
This quote is amusing.
‘ “If at first you don't secede, try again.”
TWB

28 posted on 07/29/2013 8:30:05 AM PDT by TWhiteBear (Sarah Palin...The Flame of the North)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
I would suggest that the governor of South Carolina, and ALL those SC residents who voted for her, likewise discredit Will 'FitsNews' Folks...

That would include me. Buy why the suggestion all the way from Ohio? And Nancy Mace is discredited by her association (or not associating with) Will Folks...how?

Please give better reasons for South Carolina conservatives not to support Nancy Mace, other than you guess she cannot win. And why you are against her, other than this association (or lack of association) with an Internet blogger? Sincerely, R2z
29 posted on 07/29/2013 8:35:56 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Resettozero; pissant
Can an Ohioan comment about South Carolinian political candidates? If one reads and informs oneself, I would submit 'yes'.

I followed the 2010 Nikki Haley Gubernatorial campaign closely. I became very familiar with mr. folks. I tangled regularly with pissant (dearly departed) over crap that he'd post from fitsnews.

I have clearly used 'discredited' to define Folks, not Mase. However, when I read the article, Folks name jumped out to me. I do wonder how one could be a partner, co-owner(!), with such a tasteless loser like the discredited Folks ... mostly as prompted by the article's author (Michael Patrick Leahy-is he from Ohio too?) himself ......

But Mace's campaign may be hurt by her co-ownership of a website called FITSNews. According to The Daily Beast, Will Folks, who is the site's other co-owner, "shook—or at least irritated—the political world in 2010 when he claimed that he had an affair with South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley."

30 posted on 07/29/2013 8:54:22 AM PDT by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye Battle Cry

David Dewhurst was forced into a run off with Ted Cruz in the primaries. In the primaries Dewhurst had 45% to 34% for Cruz. This forced a runoff between the two.

Dewhurst ran a dirty campaign even by Texas standards where politics is a bare knuckle fight. The people then took a good look at Cruz and Dewhurst. Cruz crushed Dewhurst 56% to 44%. The Texas Tea Party and Sarah Palin were the deciding factor in this race. Cruz was outspent about three to one.

This race was Dewhursts to lose and he did. If Dewhurst had of been a solid conservative with Tea Party principles (as is Cruz) he would have been Senator Dewhurst of Texas for as long as he wanted to be Senator.

I hope Lindsey Graham meets a similar fate.


31 posted on 07/29/2013 9:14:59 AM PDT by cpdiii (Deckhand, Roughneck, Mud Man, Geologist, Pilot, Pharmacist. THE CONSTITUTION IS WORTH DYING FOR!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Whatever. But it’s folks from Ohio and other such States that keep funding Lindsey Graham’s campaigns and not South Carolina’s conservatives.

Yes, you may offer all the advice and suggestions you want on this forum but you have given me no information that would sway me at all from continuing to investigate the possibility of supporting Nancy Mace. Lee Bright I already know.

I’m curious WHY your stance against Nancy Mace. By your intimations and insinuation that she must be corrupt somehow by her association with this blogger you say is discredited (or by her lack of association with people you approve), you are not helping S.C. FReepers (actual voters) gain useful information at all.

And thanks for nothing for indirectly associating me with the banned pissant. As a matter of fact, why don’t you keep your attention on fixing the political problems in Ohio, which are legion. -30-


32 posted on 07/29/2013 9:43:52 AM PDT by Resettozero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: wideawake

If the single candidate against Flimsey Tinkerbelle happened to be named Trey Gowdy, that challenger would WIN, hands down!


33 posted on 07/29/2013 9:55:17 AM PDT by elcid1970 ("The Second Amendment is more important than Islam.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

Does SC do runoffs? Or does the candidate with the most votes go forward?

If Graham can win on a plurality, he is sitting pretty with multiple primary challengers... They will split the vote and he’ll win.


34 posted on 07/29/2013 10:00:24 AM PDT by Little Ray (How did I end up in this hand-basket, and why is it getting so hot?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MHT

correct, one viable challenger instead of a plethora of crackpot wanabes is the only way to primary someone.

NOBODY has the money to make this work.
NOBODY has the real credibility or gravitas.


35 posted on 07/29/2013 10:01:39 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706

I really hope they are viable and can raise the money to beat Graham in the primary. We’ll see.

Either way, I am voting against him, no matter who runs against him.


36 posted on 07/29/2013 10:05:10 AM PDT by submarinerswife (Insanity is doing the same thing over and over, while expecting different results~Einstein)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Little Ray

“Does SC do runoffs? Or does the candidate with the most votes go forward?”

It says right in the article:

“Though dissatisfaction with Graham among the grassroots is high, past primary challenges to incumbent establishment Republicans in other states have succeeded only when activist support has coalesced around one strong challenger. That has not happened yet in South Carolina. The best those who oppose Graham can hope for at present is to keep him under 50% in the June 2014 primary and force a runoff.

That strategy worked for Ted Cruz in the 2012 Republican primary in Texas, where his second-place finish against Lieutenant Governor David Dewhurst in the May primary forced a July runoff between the two, which Cruz won handily.

The question South Carolina conservatives are asking themselves is whether one of the three announced or potential candidates—Cash, Bright, and Mace—will emerge as South Carolina’s version of Ted Cruz, or if that challenger has yet to arrive on the scene.”


37 posted on 07/29/2013 10:06:10 AM PDT by cotton1706
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: cotton1706


38 posted on 08/03/2013 1:38:29 PM PDT by TurboZamboni (Marx smelled bad & lived with his parents most his life.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson