Posted on 10/06/2013 7:42:36 AM PDT by txgirl4Bush
VIDEO AT LINK. Wolf Blitzer talks to a woman who witnessed the Capitol Hill shooting and describes the barrage of gunfire. Go to 1:09 to hear the truth!
(Excerpt) Read more at project.nsearch.com ...
They consider a drone strike on you because they saw you flush your illegal toilet illuminated by illegal light bulbs, but didnt catch a frame of footage of this terror crazed black woman?
Wolf the “turd” Blitzer, nothign but a mouthpiece for the commies on the left.
Of course without knowing what was going on at the time, that's an understandable reaction.
Yet it doesn't seem to cross her mind and Wulf Blitzer's mind that now after the fact when we find out that the driver was unarmed, that ALL the frightening bullets and gun fire came from the police who shot a woman on a public street.
Blitzer ends the interview saying that he was glad that the woman was safe, but in actuality there was never a time where this woman wan't safe from the driver.
Dead Men(woman)tell no tales.
I wonder how many standing ovations they would have gotten from congress if they had blown the baby away?
They have footage of both the execution and the prior event at the White House.
Think of all the possible reasons why we haven’t seen either one.
I don’t believe that Soetoro is the babydaddy, but someone in his administration knows this poor woman. The dead bodies are piling up under this Regime - people from Soetoro’s past (all men) were executed in Chicago before he ran for president. Everyone is afraid to talk about him.
If Ms.Carey’s child is still in foster care, that tells you even more. She has family, but the message has to be made clear that if you want to see your grandchild/niece again, then you better keep your mouths shut.
Gee, I was so glad to hear that. Its all about him you know?/s
The bomb excuse is BS; however she did seem to be using the car as a weapon against the cops in the clip. This is not to say it was justified, but cops tend to get a bit upset when people try to run them over. They are funny that way.
Actually, quite believable. Typical police thinking in a case like this is that a child in the vehicle is a *hostage* to the adult, whoever the adult is.
There is some sense in this, because terrorists frequently use children both as shields, and to prevent a shooting defense *long enough* to say, get a car bomb to its target.
The critical, overriding thing is that the armed police, city and federal, in D.C., have to work in two modes: ordinary crimes and terrorism. And the selector switch between these two modes can change in a moment.
If they thought this woman was just intoxicated, or an ordinary criminal, they might shoot her if she used her car as a weapon, or like a weapon. However, if they think she is acting like a terrorist, it is shoot first and ask questions later.
Initially, they were probably patting themselves on the back for “rescuing” the child before “killing the terrorist”.
No, but I heard that the day after her death she became a registered Democrat.
After the threat of being ran over by her vehicle was removed, why did the cops gun her down? Was it just because they we’re pissed off?
She’ll be voting early and often!
With all the cell phones cameras everywhere, I can’t believe there’s not some video somewhere.
So where are Jesse and Sharpton?
This African-American was executed by LEOs.
Were the killers black too, does that make it OK for the media?
She was a liberal asking for her obamacheck she was lied about and was executed.
DC police is notoriously corrupt with a crime rate within rAnks 100 folds that of Chicago. They will smoke pot in uniform in certain areas, joking wih dealers.
New rules of engagement on US soil.
I remember that story of this guy intimidating a pimp who was beating a prostitute, and the DC cops went after him instead of the pimp.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.