To: John Semmens
2 posted on
01/20/2014 9:11:34 AM PST by
jimmyo57
To: John Semmens
I think that having to show a driver’s license places an undue burden on me.
3 posted on
01/20/2014 9:11:44 AM PST by
Shimmer1
(Don't argue with an idiot; people watching may not be able to tell the difference)
To: John Semmens
Is Bernard McGinley an admitted communist?
To: John Semmens
Hasn’t a higher court already ruled on this?
6 posted on
01/20/2014 9:14:57 AM PST by
Viennacon
To: John Semmens; NFHale; lightman; P.O.E.
RE :”
McGinley dismissed comparisons with the ID requirements people must meet to buy liquor or cash a check, as misapplied and confused. Transactions in the commercial sector are privileges extended by private parties. Voting is a fundamental human right that may not be limited in any way.” Right, like gay marriage is, and abortion.
Lib judges think they are Kings.
8 posted on
01/20/2014 9:23:00 AM PST by
sickoflibs
(Obama : 'If you like your Doctor you can keep him, PERIOD! Don't believe the GOPs warnings')
To: John Semmens
Try cashing a check down at your local Winn-Dixie without a photo ID issued by some state agency.
Possible, but it takes several degrees of persuasion. If the person who refuses to provide a photo ID, then the vote should remain “provisional”, not subject to being counted, until an acceptable form of identification is presented.
9 posted on
01/20/2014 9:25:52 AM PST by
alloysteel
(Obamacare - Death and Taxes now available online. One-stop shopping at its best!)
To: John Semmens
Let me offer shampoo rules for such judges:
Impeach, remove & replace.
Continue with all like judges!
14 posted on
01/20/2014 9:51:23 AM PST by
ICE-FLYER
(God bless and keep the United States of America)
To: John Semmens
Ben Stein's response to this nonsense is not satire:
17 posted on
01/20/2014 10:01:48 AM PST by
Grampa Dave
( Obamacare is a Trinity of Lies! Obamaganda is failing 24/7/365! Obamaganda witholl fail 24/7/365!)
To: John Semmens; All
I cannot believe that a judge actually said this:
The fear that some individuals mat vote multiple times is exaggerated. Even if it were true, all it signifies is an above average concern for the outcome of an election. Aren’t such committed voters more in tune with the spirit of democracy? Shouldn’t we want such commitment to carry greater weight than the lesser exertions of others who limit themselves to voting only once?
God help us!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson