Posted on 06/30/2014 11:06:41 AM PDT by therightliveswithus
As usual, when a ruling has gone against liberals, their faux "civility" has washed away to show their true side: anger, contempt, and violent intentions.
Liberals took to social media to voice their homicidal rage because the Supreme Court decided two major rulings today: that people cannot be forced by the government to provide contraception if it specifically conflicted with their religious beliefs, and that unions cannot force non-members to give them money.
Like the civil people they are, liberals decided that anyone who disagrees with them deserves death and, for the heck of it, the United States itself should be destroyed.
Here are just a few examples.
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
so tolerant they are..
The liberals will be the first to die when the muslims come, and they will come.
So I suppose the DOJ and SS will be investigating the death threats, eh?
So much for working across the isle. I guess it’s only a one way isle.
The real face of the left.
I love it-—they are truly insane.
Making death threats is not a good idea IMHO.
.
Supreme Court justices being killed. Happens all the time. Just like hard drives crashing.
Not sure why, but I get a kick out of progressives threatening violence.
Because people shouldn’t be free to exercise their religion. Yep. Sounds liek tolerance from the left-tards to me.
They are leftists. No police department, no prosecutor is going to go after them for their obvious expressions of violent anger.
Change this to a normal person, and they’re all arrested and banned from twitter for life.
Let them actualize their fantiasies.
All we need is an excuse.
And so, so consistent!
The absolute hypocrisy and duplicity of the American statist left defies logical explanation!
Putting aside for the moment that “statist left” and “logical” should NEVER APPEAR in the same rant, the just announced Hobby Lobby decision by the Supremes displayed it for all to see. All, that is, except the looney 47% who are receiving all the “free” chit and other goodies dispensed by the left to keep them voting for Democrat hacks who promise more and more of the free chit.
At the time the left rammed through the (Un)Affordable Care Act, there were loud protests from the few million or so sane citizens still living here that it would interpose fedzilla into the formerly sacred relationship between patient and doctor. The equally looney “We have to pass it to find out what’s in it” left quickly waved a collective imperious hand and uttered a royal “Tsk, tsk”, dismissed the objectors and returned to destroying the fabric of the country.
Comes now the favorable Hobby Lobby decision and comes now two pro-abortion radical feminazis to – where else – MSNBC to decry and lament over the decision. One was Rep. Nita Lowey from NYC (aka Gomorrah on the Hudson) and another woman representing one of the several Margaret Sanger eugenics inspired pro-abortion groups still murdering babies in the former safety of their mothers’ wombs.
Their first and only opposition argument? Though I suspect you have figured this out, better brace yourself: “It would interfere with the sanctity of the relationship between a woman and her doctor.”
And before you hit the reply button with “What about the hypocrisy of the pro-life right in celebrating Hobby Lobby?”
You may have overlooked the third and silent party in the discussion: The unborn baby!
The pro-aborts maintain that a fetus is NOT a human being either until birth or the third trimester. (I’ll believe that when a human female delivers a chicken or a cow.) And a number of courts here and in other nations regularly rule in support of that erroneous notion.
And while we’re discussing “hypocrisy”, can you explain this to me? How is it that those same courts correctly rule in cases involving intentional or accidental serious injury to or death of a pregnant woman that if her unborn baby is injured or dies, her baby constitutes a SECOND victim of the trauma or crime and the jury/judge nearly always factors that into the civil judgment or criminal sentence?
That concept comes down to us from the over 2,000 year old law found in the Bible.
And here’s one final piece of law from that Good Book: “A double-minded man (or woman) is UNSTABLE in ALL his (or her) ways”.
What does that say about 21st century America?
Just sayin’
Dick Bachert
6 30 2014
Then we deal with the muzzies.
NEXT PROBLEM!!
Wish these people were that excited about stopping Obamacare & what a mess it has created....this latest ruling being part of that.
They’re terrorists!
:) Sometimes I wish we could just get the thing started already, ya know?
I soooo with they would try to start a revolution. There are 223 reasons they’re fail.
Not sure I'd be so flippant about it. That Nic looks like a real bad ass.
Kill them with what?
Certainly they don’t mean guns.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.