If homosexuality was genetic, it would have been bred out of the system eons ago.
If the were a gene, we could cure it.
“A homosexuality gene, if it existed, would quickly die out.”
Thats the idea. It’s natures way of saying “Do not reproduce,
you have nothing to contribute to the gene pool”.
If someone ever discovered a homosexuality gene there are many parents who would abort babies that had it. That would cause liberals’ heads to explode.
The premise of the article is false. There could be an adaptive purpose to homosexuality which escapes the author. Just because the author states otherwise doesn’t make it true. In any case, it is testable, when more people have the entire genome sequenced. There may be, or there may not be, one or more genes for homosexuality. Time will tell. This author is not the final arbiter. A suicide gene has been identified. How come that hasn’t died out?
Woo-woo — where does the lesbian gene come from? same place as the sodomite gene?
Beyond that, the idea of "choice" is a dangerous and misleading one. To attribute homosexual orientation, and subsequently, sex, to choice is akin to saying that development of any addiction is a choice. It fails to account for a wealth of empirical knowledge and information about the acquisition of learned responses through instrumental conditioning, imitation, identification, and other powerful processes.
Better to recognize that the constellation of behaviors generally lumped together as "homosexuality" are multiply determined, as are most other complex social behaviors, and to eschew the simplistic binary question of "Genetic--yes or no."
Don’t confuse me with the facts, man!
Anything they can do to validate and defend it they will use. Kinda weird though. I mean, you can’t call a faggot a faggot because they say that’s hate speech, but faggots call each other faggots
There are lots of environmental causes for congenital conditions. What if the hormone balance in the mother is wrong? Not enough vitamins? Illness during pregnancy?
According to the compelling logic of the article,
homosexuality would be a non-beneficial mutation,
like Tay–Sachs disease among Ashkenazi Jews,
except that we just need to find a way to
rid their bodies of the gene before they
accidentally pass the trait onto an
offspring during one of the drug-
and sex-fueled binges.
Hey, we’re trying to save them here!
/s
Who said there needs to be a “gene”?
Homosexuality can be one of many defects, which means, yes, you ccan be born with this defect. Not something that has to pass down, but occurs in nature occassionally, for any number of reasons.
I do not know if it is “genetic” or a choice. I see no problem either way. Personally, I do not know why anyone in his RIGHT MIND would choose to be homo. See? It can be a birth issue, just like many birth defects, including maybe just fall-out from some mental issues.
Nowadays may have some exceptions, since homos are making such huge inroads they have convinced some innocent young people it is “hip” to be a defective. But outside this late insanity in society at large, I do not think anyone would choose it.
Premise is demonstrably false. Instead of thinking about a “homosexual” genetic defect, apply the same logic to other “genetic defects”.
Ask yourself this: “Are there any genetic defects which typically prevent reproduction because they are fatal?”
The answer is “Yes,” and many can be named.
So why are these genes still persistant?
well, what about the gene that makes them talk that way?;)
Promoting homosexuality and abortion is a form of biological warfare to eventually kill a nation.
But never-mind! Liberals can't be bothered with facts in their feel-good emotional world of Rube Goldberg theoretical constructs.
From “Global Warming” to “Homosexual Marriage” liberals love to talk among themselves about how superior and Utopian they are, while branding their philosophical and political opponents sub-humans.
By thus labeling those with whom they don't agree, they are not bound by any ethical requirement to respectfully listen to them.
Pure mental disorder, just buried as such to promote the destruction of the family and American culture.
Think of it more like down syndrome, a mental disorder of the mind. Basically a birth defect.
Some people say “God made them that way” or believe in Plato’s soul-mate hypothesis. Many people have challenged the “it’s genetic” argument by questioning how a gay gene could reproduce successfully......but some of us still wonder how SAME-sex marriage can be about “diversity” & different/opposite sex marriage can be considered square, straight/strait-jacketed. Surely, terms such as “gay” & “straight” are biased & Orwellian—as if saying it’s not a choice, but making moral judgments, anyway. If we all were “born that way”, then why use terms such as “gay” & “straight”—as if it is a choice? It’s beyond mere euphemism & into propaganda. Are all homosexuals happy & lighthearted? No! Are all heterosexuals straight-laced, uptight or strait-jacketed? No!