Posted on 11/05/2014 7:33:15 AM PST by therightliveswithus
In an interesting coincidence, in a number of precincts, Republican Ed Gillespie received fewer than 10 votes. Yet, this was not because of a lack of eligible voters.
Instead, Gillespie's opponent, Mark Warner, did extremely well in such precincts, drastically out-gaining his opponent. Warner went on to win.
Added together, the precincts that Gillespie received 9 or fewer votes adds up to 98. In those same precincts, Warner received an astounding 5,657 votes.
Even stranger is the fact that a number of these precincts were near each other and drastically favored Warner.
In Newport News City, there were seven precincts where Gillespie received fewer than 10 votes. Though Warner won the city 60.4-37.6%, in these seven precincts, the margin was an astronomical 98.5-1.5%, or 1,791-28.
You can see some of these precincts below:
(Excerpt) Read more at thepunditpress.com ...
more democrat voter fraud
the democrat party is a marxist,evil, criminal organization
The Dems have perfected vote fraud by targeting key precincts and races. Their ability to narrowly exploit fraud is amazing.
What kind of machine tabulates those votes? Marker and paper or the automated ones that keep F’ing up?
Well, at least this time there wasn’t 200% and higher voting totals..
Are any of these in districts where there are white people?
They zero in on precincts where it would be, ahem, racist to suggest any criminal intent.
sounds like maybe there needs to be some investigatin’...congressional style.
Do any of you Virginians know what the Republican primary vote was in those precincts?
...not live
something definitely smells here - have to do an exhaustive recount.
There wasn’t a primary for the senate race. It was decided at the convention.
One would think the GOP could contact GOP voters in those precincts who voted and ascertain if they really did vote Democrat in the numbers reported. All it would take is three GOP voters to expose fraud in some cases.
In fairness to my state- these are UNOFFICIAL results!
I don’t expect them to stand through the canvas, which takes about a week.
If they do it’s very troubling. Thanks to this guy for his work.
BIG coincidence!
CAN HE CONTEST THE RESULTS???
Would be interesting to compare turnout and Republican vote totals in these precincts for prior elections. Presumably these are African American strongholds, but even so, 5 to 10% of AA’s usually vote Republican. This smells of rigged voting machines “calibrated” to count R votes as D.
All they need to do is find a few dozen voters in those districts who can be shown to have voted, and claim to have voted (R).
Demand an investigation.
WE NEED TO FIGHT VOTER FRAUD MORE THAN ANYTHING ELSE! IT IS *THE* MARGIN OF VICTORY FOR DEMS IN MOST CASES!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.