Posted on 02/19/2015 12:10:25 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
...no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States.
ARTICLE VI
I’ve had some grad students tell me that they were pressured on even some very tangentially related research papers to include how the findings support evolution.
Today, it’s probably global warming... err... climate change.
Also a key requirement is that useful information must be added through mutation, a destructive process.
Wow... we’re on exactly the same page.
That’s what this is, indeed -
you must adhere to the religion of materialistic humanism or you cannot be president.
I personally believe that species like zebras, ponies, etc came from a common ancestor,
as did tigers, lions, jaguars, panthers, bobcats, and Binky,
though from a different common ancestor.
Those suffering from Down Syndrome don't reproduce, by your logic Down Syndrome should have disappeared long ago as well. Same with Tay Sachs. Evolution does not claim to do away with genetic abnormalities.
One might want to read “The Privileged Planet” or view the DVD.
Voters can apply whatever test they see fit as to the candidate they choose. Unfortunately, intelligence is not a caveat in the process, hence the disaster we have today.
I once worked for a temp. agency as a staffer (not a temporary) and they paid depending on the degree you held, even though in most cases your degree had little or nothing to do with the tasks you were assigned.
There’s a followup that I eagerly await at our library:
Privileged Species
Downs people are sterile?
They seldom if ever are in a position to reproduce.
We disapprove of their reproducing, especially in Western society, but they are not, by and large, any more sterile than anyone else. Any physicians here?
I liked Duncan Hunter’s answer when he was asked about evolution in 08.
He said he believed that God is the creator of the universe and didn’t really care if it took 7 days or billions of years.
Evolution theory as taught in government schools skips some important details that makes it reasonable to reject. Natural evolution is one thing, very slow with many variations on a theme, but what humans experienced was highly unusual and has not been duplicated. There is some unexplained environmental pressure driving the need for increasing human intelligence far in excess of that needed for basic survival, and it does not apply to anything else. It is not natural evolution, but super-natural evolution. One explanation is this special pressure is tribal warfare, which is driven by human vanity and envy. If so, the word human really means war maker, something libtards could never accept. We are killers to the bone and that DNA cannot be suppressed by leftist indoctrination in the government schools. Until they teach a theory of human evolution that plausibly adds up, people are completely reasonable in rejecting it.
That position is pretty easy to get into, if I recall...
Actually they are. Fewer than half of Downs Syndrome females are fertile and the potency rate for males is far less than that. The number of reported births resulting from either a male or female with Downs Syndrome is is very low, fewer than 30 since 2006.
That’s a good answer, but I would also question the asker - what exactly are your motives behind asking the question?
And you base that on?
I know two personally, so those numbers seem off a bit.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.