Posted on 03/27/2015 8:59:59 AM PDT by Oldpuppymax
President Obama’s Social Security numbers do not verify he even is a U.S. Citizen. A mismatch, two differing numbers at least, an imagined flight by a 15 year old from Hawaii to Connecticut to apply in person, and other anomalies are causing confusion yet again over the true identity of the man sitting in America’s Oval Office! A Notice of Mismatch on a Social Security Administration (SSA) Records form displays an incongruent match which was somehow sent to the President on 08/17/11. This mismatch refers to ss# 042-68-4425. The case verification number is 2011229111431GY. (1) The form contains a chilling warning: “SSA unable to confirm U.S. Citizenship. Cannot confirm that the employee is eligible to work because the SSA records DO NOT SHOW THAT THE SSN HOLDER is a U.S. CITIZEN!” (2) (emphasis added)
While this may be old news to many, these extraordinary details are surfacing yet again because the left-wing, fact finder web site Snopes is attempting to discredit the work of Private Investigators Susan Daniels and Neil Sankey. Of course, countless Americans who have spent thousands of hours researching the lies of Barack Obama wonder in frustration why our mainstream media are not investigating the corruption of this administration.
Snopes is saying that the Jean Paul Ludwig CT ss#, 042-68-4425 does not belong to BHO. The site seeks to discount the Daniels-Sankey research, but these two Investigators readily admit the Ludwig number is, in fact, a mismatch. “He is using someone else’s social security number!” they state. So just whose social security number does the President carry? Did he apply in person at age 15 for his own personal number? Did someone in CT get him that number? If the Ludwig number is not being used, which one is? An old web rumor suggested that...
(Excerpt) Read more at coachisright.com ...
Don’t look for any action to come out of our inillustrious Congress.
...and why doesn’t the Republican party lift a finger to investigate any of this?
Because it’s an immigration issue and the GOP has no more interest in protecting American citizenship than the Democrats.
Heck, back in the day if someone didn’t have all their documentation for a passport or whatever, all they had to do was grab the first judge who wandered down the hallway and the clerk would approve a “I was there when he was born” verbal statement from him. Yes, that’s exactly why Gov. Pothead Abercrombie said those exact words about knowing all about baby Barry.
Just imagine that we later on find out that a foreigner was the cause of our national decline. What do we do then?
There are people who are guilty of making this seriously unconstitutional event happen. Will they be prosecuted?
This will happen. I pray it does while all the Obama voters / suckers are alive.
I’m sure the people who are legally on the hook like Pelosi will never be prosecuted. Obama would be pardoned. And as long as the Democrat party and the Obamas are forever held in the public’s mind as criminals I don’t care about him being pardoned.
The 15 year old Obama needed an SS card to work at baskin Robbins. Maybe grandma got wind of him pulling gay tricks. Scooping ice cream, not as embarrassing to the neighbors.
They couldn’t get him any documentation because he was obviously born without citizenship.
Occam’s razor approved theory: knocked up 17 year old Stanley Ann went where all the girls who got “in trouble” in her Seattle high school went. They were sent to one of two Vancouver unwed mothers homes. She was SUPPOSED to give up her mulatto baby and go back to college. Something happened. The first sighting of newborn Barack was in Seattle when Stanley Ann was registering for the semester. Her friend babysat baby Barack, and Stanley Ann did not even know how to change his diaper. She must have suddenly decided to keep him.
Since he was born across the border, and since she wasn’t old enough to confer citizenship on him, this gave him his lifelong problem of not actually being American.
Only this scenario fits the facts. No one would send their 17 year old pregnant girl to africa. Barack Obama Sr was never in the picture during pregnancy. She was first seen with newborn baby Barack in Seattle. And certainly he has always had citizenship problems.
apply for an elite school
Wow, did we know about Marie Pope or did I forget?!?
Interesting about the passport.
I’m older and I didn’t get one until I applied for a job @ 17yrs old.
Also, the military, when I went in, used service numbers. Now they use SSNs.
SSN today is still not mandatory, but if you don’t get your kid an SSN, you can’t claim them on your taxes as an exemption.
I’d think your scenario is pretty reasonable.
But I don’t understand the “across the border” part.
Does that mean the unwed mother facility was in Vancouver BC Canada?
“”Hone you obamaroid apologetics a bit there””
And you understood that?
“”Is there a verifiable piece of paper with his name using this number before he announced for President in 2007/2008?””
I wonder what would happen if someone was to spread some money around the Chicago area - the University for example where he (ahem!) taught Constitutional Law...or the law firm where he supposedly worked one time. Grease enough palms and no telling what might come to the surface. It’s not likely anyone would be found who owed allegiance to those protecting him at THAT time...but perhaps NOW would be a different story. Great story plot!
Might it turn out to be like the vital statistic records in HI? Doesn’t exist? Maybe - maybe not!
“”A Notice of Mismatch on a Social Security Administration (SSA) Records form displays an incongruent match which was somehow sent to the President on 08/17/11. This mismatch refers to ss# 042-68-4425. The case verification number is 2011229111431GY. (1) The form contains a chilling warning: “SSA unable to confirm U.S. Citizenship. Cannot confirm that the employee is eligible to work because the SSA records DO NOT SHOW THAT THE SSN HOLDER is a U.S. CITIZEN!””
I sure wish the article had included a copy of that SSA notice. I’ve seen a lot of them over the years from working in payroll departments so wondered if it’s the same thing. Odd to write that it was sent but not to produce a copy of it?
As I recall the employer(s) are cautioned to take no action regarding the employee whose number does not match an existing issued number but to obtain a correct number from that employee. I always thought that had to produce a smile from the person responsible for sending those notices out..
“”There are people who are guilty of making this seriously unconstitutional event happen. Will they be prosecuted?””
AND the people following him blindly in the administration. The Nazis were tried and executed or imprisoned for “following orders.” Heck - there are tons of those in the administration. Just look at the number of them who get up in front of cameras and lie to us every day at press briefings. JUST FOLLOWING ORDERS!
If I got a vote it would be trials and guillotines for the lot of them. Criminal anti-American bastards are enemies of the Republic, running amok, with democrap voters enabling the criminality with a smile on their dirty faces.
Don’t forget the media. We can line the Beltway with gallows.
I’m serious.
I believe that Romans sometimes upholstered judges’ benches with the hides of corrupt judges. Just sayin’.
More from the article:
“...An old web rumor suggested that a family member charged with rearing the young teen used protected access to somehow fill in the blanks via cyberspace from Hawaii to SSA offices in CT.
The pesky detail of hand written forms back in the day are, however, bothersome.
The Social Security Administration rule that if you are over age 12, you must apply for a SS# IN PERSON is leaving private investigators perplexed as they ask, “Is there a single rational person in this country who believes a fifteen year old flew from HI to CT to get a social security number when he could have gotten his there?” (2) Obama nativity seekers agree with Snopes, Daniels and Sankey that the Ludwig CT number is a mismatch.
Controversy is again erupting over where, when and how President Obama obtained a number ending in 4425, dated March’77.
Daniels rightly states, “Social Security numbers WERE NEVER RANDOMLY ASSIGNED before.”
She does, however, take note of the fact that later in March, 2015, this federal agency “is going to start issuing the cards randomly.”
More governance by confusion, perhaps.
The PIs point out a significant change in language on the SSA website, which now states that “a person does not have to live in the state for which the number has been set aside.”
Daniels says this change “was never written there before Obama’s fraudulent use of his number was challenged.” Daniels quickly admits that the Ludwig ss#, long believed to have been associated with BHO, was not the one he used. Neil Sankey says he agrees and supports “what Susan says.” (3)
Up on birthreport.com is this Notice of Mismatch.
Consider again the fact that the Social Security Administration is “…unable to confirm U.S. Citizenship…cannot confirm that (BHO) is eligible to work because the SSA records do not show that the SSN holder is a U.S. Citizen.”
Is Barack Obama’s personal history of fraudulently obtained citizenship driving his political decisions as they concern the Executive Order on immigration?
Daniels goes on to point out that all Social Security numbers around the March ’77 date and their number sequencing would have been done in long hand.
“Now that we have seen the phony ‘birth certificate,’ let’s see that phony SS-5.” (4)
Sankey, a former UK investigator with impeccable credentials, says he gave Dr. Orly Taitz his findings for the Taitz legal challenges.
“They (the ss #s) are not verified, or presented as being accurate…it should, MUST, be properly investigated by the proper Authorities.” he concludes.
(Lots of luck with that)
One researcher found 27 different names in 22 states with 21 different social security numbers upon lengthy study of the Sankey data base.
SOURCE: all references are from http://www.birtherreport.com/2014/11/private-investigators-respond-to-sno. . . “
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.