Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

America: A nation divided against itself
Canada Free Press ^ | 03/30/15 | Dale Summit

Posted on 03/30/2015 6:01:34 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony

It is painfully obvious what the statist, anti-Christian, anti-freedom leftists have decided is their ruthless intent

Abraham Lincoln, while campaigning for the U.S. Senate from Illinois, made a now-famous speech on June 16, 1858 in which, citing the irreconcilable North-South division of America on the eve of the civil war, said, ” a nation divided against itself cannot stand “; The Dred Scott decision by the U.S. Supreme Court in the prior year 1857, is regarded by many historians to be the tipping point to the Civil War, because the ruling dictated that a slave was the property of the owner, even if that slave stepped onto free soil. Anti-slavery abolitionists were outraged that a slave on free territory could now be forcibly removed by the law of the land, back to his or her owner in a slave state.

Therefore, Lincoln foresaw that the question could no longer be sidestepped by ” popular sovereignty”, wherein each individual state’s voting citizens would decide whether to allow or to prohibit slavery within its borders. In this speech, Lincoln continued further, to predict, that America would not remain ” divided against itself “; that it ” could not stand “.........” it (America) will either become all one thing, or all the other “. He was essentially predicting two specifics: (1) America as a nation would either allow slavery in all of the states nationwide, or (2) America would abolish slavery nationwide. Had the war gone the other way, America would be two separate nations.

(Excerpt) Read more at canadafreepress.com ...


TOPICS: Government; Politics; Society
KEYWORDS: abortion; antichristian; antifreedomleftists; deathpanels; obamacare; zerocare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 03/30/2015 6:01:34 PM PDT by Sean_Anthony
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

After CW-II, might it not be better to Gen Sherman the lib states?


2 posted on 03/30/2015 6:14:53 PM PDT by Da Coyote
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

bump


3 posted on 03/30/2015 6:16:52 PM PDT by foreverfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

I was struck today more conclusively than ever with the certain knowledge that we as a nation are morally bankrupt to such a degree that we can not stand. We are as deeply divided as we were when slavery was the issue. Today it is abortion, homosexuality and statism.
We will either be at war with each other over this or we will be destroyed by collapse. Our president is hell bent on bringing about Armageddon. It will happen sooner rather than later.
Abandoning Israel will probably be the final straw. I am certain in my heart that he sees this as the act that will bring us to our knees and allow him to establish martial law in the land. I pray for the salvation of a remnant.


4 posted on 03/30/2015 6:17:46 PM PDT by Louis Foxwell (This is a wake up call. Join the Sultan Knish ping list.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Anti-slavery abolitionists were outraged that a slave on free territory could now be forcibly removed by the law of the land, back to his or her owner in a slave state.

The DS decision didn't initiate this. In fact, return of slaves to their masters was part of the Constitution.

The DS decision upset people in the North because it made it impossible to prevent the spread of slavery. And because many believed that it would be used as a precedent to make it impossible for free states to prevent slavery in their own bounds.

5 posted on 03/30/2015 6:29:01 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

A “celebration” of diversity and multiculturalism in the American population was introduced in the 1960s and 70s as a deliberate divisive revolutionary tool wielded by Marxists like Saul Alinsky, Bill Ayers and other radicals. It became dogma taught by Marxists in our universities, then spread by our leftist controlled news media and leftist controlled Hollywood. The intent was, and is, to split American culture along race and class lines and set off a “proletarian” revolution to destroy capitalism. The Left has now managed to elect a half-Black radical as President and their revolution is proceeding along very predictable lines, with him using every opportunity to stir up more division and discontent. A reading of the Constitution of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA at this link should make clear their goals and methods: http://revcom.us/Constitution/constitution.html


6 posted on 03/30/2015 6:32:38 PM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

This country is hopelessly divided. In time, a breakup similar to that of Czechoslovakia will be necessary for survival.


7 posted on 03/30/2015 6:33:08 PM PDT by ScottinVA (GOP = Geldings Obama Possesses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

If the black-robed tyrants impose homo-marriage onto the country, then the country be damned. I’ll be more than ready to see America split in two.


8 posted on 03/30/2015 6:33:09 PM PDT by greene66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Louis Foxwell

You are not alone.


9 posted on 03/30/2015 6:34:53 PM PDT by Eagles6 (Valley Forge Redux. If not now, when? If not here, where? If not us then who?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: DJ Taylor

Disgusting isn’t it. And quite the wordy document.


10 posted on 03/30/2015 6:55:07 PM PDT by Nuc 1.1 (Nuc 1 Liberals aren't Patriots. Remember 1789!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony
Abraham Lincoln ... said, ” a nation divided against itself cannot stand “

Well, no he didn't.

He said, quoting the Bible, "A house divided against itself cannot stand."

11 posted on 03/30/2015 6:59:43 PM PDT by Sherman Logan (>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Da Coyote

+1


12 posted on 03/30/2015 7:01:58 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

When all that holds a nation together is a set of common ideas, and those ideas become no longer common, what then?


13 posted on 03/30/2015 7:03:31 PM PDT by GenXteacher (You have chosen dishonor to avoid war; you shall have war also.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GenXteacher

When all that holds a nation together is a set of common ideas, and those ideas become no longer common, what then?


Divide and conquer.


14 posted on 03/30/2015 7:10:06 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Sean_Anthony

Does everybody here realize or even know that Slavery was NEVER AN ISSUE during or before the Civil War until a couple years into it, as an effort to get more people to join the fight on both sides.?


15 posted on 03/30/2015 7:16:29 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

And The Emancipation Proclamation was also used to keep Britain from siding with the South.


16 posted on 03/30/2015 7:31:37 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: laplata

Sometimes I get so fed up with revisionist history, I want to puke or beat the person spouting known lies. To see where Lincoln stood on Slavery, read the transcripts of the Stephen Douglas Debates!


17 posted on 03/30/2015 7:33:35 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Slavery might not have been the only issue precipitating the Civil War, but it was most definitely an issue. Just because Lincoln stated that slavery was not his priority, doesn’t mean the rest of the country felt that way.


18 posted on 03/30/2015 7:38:27 PM PDT by fr_freak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: eyeamok

Me, too.

And Lincoln wanted to send the blacks back to Africa.

Liberia was founded after his death but he would have approved.


19 posted on 03/30/2015 7:41:42 PM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: fr_freak

It was not an issue, read the Douglas Debates, read for yourself. Don’t force me to go look this up again and post it, to be honest, I am tired of attempting to get people to have the courage to believe the TRUTH!!


20 posted on 03/30/2015 7:44:35 PM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson