I am starting to think that fashion sense and musical theater are not important enough to not put them in mental institutions.
More like standing up for the Constitution but the left would never know that! I will pick my candidates to vote for by their actions regarding this leftist attack and their reaction to it.
Good luck with that.
I never thought I`d be the doomsayer, but freedom of speech and frredom of religion are dead.
If you don`t believe me,ask “Memories Pizza”.
LGBT activists sincerely believe that conservative religious people are Nazis and KKK, meaning they can do whatever they want to hurt you.
Just as the Nazis programmed their followers to see Jews and others as “subhuman”, those who have religious beliefs about gay marriage and homosexuality are now relegated to “subhuman” status by LGBT activism, supported by Big Government, Big Media and Big Business.
Its insanity and it cannot be reasoned with.
Homosexuality IS NOT normal.
Ronald Reagan's answer to this tactic was expressed by him at the influential 1984 Prayer Breakfast speech on the opening days of that year's Republican Convention in Dallas. "Politics and religion are, of necessity, related," he said.
The electoral vote that year illustrates better than a thousand columns how this doctrinal difference played out, at a time when the Legacy Media orthodoxy was no more sympathetic with "the Christian Right" than it is today. That repudiation by the American voter did not change the dogma of the Old New Left of course, which is no less strident on their bigoted beliefs than were the Nazis were on "the Jewish question," even as the Allied armies surrounded Berlin in 1945.
Its a matter of faith, not of holy reason but forged in the fires of hell itself, and therefore immune from reasonable proofs.
Because another of the Old New Left's beliefs is in government being the final arbiter of "Society," and because they also believe the latter to be a closed system, like creation without a Creator, and perhaps also because the ranks of those in mass movements are typically at war against individuality (especially their own, belonging to an unwanted self, in need of annihilation) - explains their vehement striving against any Christians being at the Table of their imaginary "Society."
They actually believe "Society" and "culture" and government are all, in some way, one closed system, one thing. Reasonable people, and the non-reactionary Christians who think among them, know there is much beyond this subjective "Society," much that is above and also below it, also. Aspects of these broad generalizations can help explain the odd worship of "consensus" on the part of people who pride themselves, above all else, on their open-mindedness.
I intend on not being shamed, on not accepting their assumptions, their attitudes about progress, which seems more about passing fancies with regard to fashion - regardless of their attempts to institute a militia of fashion police. And that will remain my attitude long after these Jacobins set up any Reign of Terror. Resistance is never futile when God and His Heaven are included in one's perceptions, even if that perception arises from merely allowing merely for the possibility of a "God and His Heaven."
The most neglected battlefield in any culture war, it seems to me, is the field between our ears and in our hearts. There is also another ground that the Old New Left is desperate to exclude, and that Eternal Backdrop is already well won, and therefore all their "victories" are hollow.
I shall not be moved.
“The truth is most Christian businesses never inquire or care about their customers’ personal lives. Yet, some activists are hell bent on politicizing their sexuality and enjoy creating a contentious conflict of interest.”
Pretty much says it all. Your use of “hell bent” was ironically appropriate.
Say it is a “sinful lifestyle choice”.