Disobey in mass quantities because once they get them, tyranny goes into overkill and killing the dissenters begins
We will not comply.
What would Michael Collins do?
And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: What would things have been like if every Security operative, when he went out at night to make an arrest, had been uncertain whether he would return alive and had to say good-bye to his family? Or if, during periods of mass arrests, as for example in Leningrad, when they arrested a quarter of the entire city, people had not simply sat there in their lairs, paling with terror at every bang of the downstairs door and at every step on the staircase, but had understood they had nothing left to lose and had boldly set up in the downstairs hall an ambush of half a dozen people with axes, hammers, pokers, or whatever else was at hand?... The Organs would very quickly have suffered a shortage of officers and transport and, notwithstanding all of Stalin's thirst, the cursed machine would have ground to a halt! If...if...We didn't love freedom enough. And even more we had no awareness of the real situation.... We purely and simply deserved everything that happened afterward. - Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn, The Gulag Archipelago
5% of 100 million is 5 million Americans. I doubt we'll see those numbers. In the northeast and west, they'll get what they want. In the midwest and south, there will be very bloody battles between the people and the government. I am prepared.
A few rhetorical questions.
How does one overturn an amendment to the constitution, and a part of the bill of rights...unconstitutional?
The idea that the court could say that possession of a weapon is only for militia, then it begets the question of just “who is the militia?” But even this is negated by the clear words “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
When they have finally made that leap..the first casualty will be that the English language is dead.
Just last week a federal judge ruled that a state ban on “assault weapons” could stand because it “increase the public’s sense of security”. In other words it was constitutional because it made liberals FEEL safer, not that it actually did anything.
I was shooting .4-.6” groups with my AR10 last week. just sayin’.