Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hillary Clinton is a criminal
Flopping Aces ^ | 07-24-15 | DrJohn

Posted on 07/24/2015 5:14:57 PM PDT by Starman417

hillary jail

 

Darkness approaches the Clinton campaign. Maybe.

Two Inspectors General have asked the Justice Department to open an investigation  into Hillary's handling of classified material on her private server.

WASHINGTON — Two inspectors general have asked the Justice Department to open a criminal investigation into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state, senior government officials said Thursday.

The request follows an assessment in a June 29 memo by the inspectors general for the State Department and the intelligence agencies that Mrs. Clinton's private account contained "hundreds of potentially classified emails." The memo was written to Patrick F. Kennedy, the under secretary of state for management.

 

Originally it was described in the NY Times thusly:

"into whether Hillary Rodham Clinton mishandled sensitive government information on a private email account she used as secretary of state."
The Clinton campaign called in to complain and the Times was more than happy to oblige, changing it to:
"into whether sensitive government information was mishandled in connection with the personal email account Hillary Rodham Clinton used as secretary of state."
One could only imagine the NY Times changing a story to improve Donald Trump's image.

Hillary campaign spokesman Nick Merrill issued this statement:

“Contrary to the initial story, which has already been significantly revised, she followed appropriate practices in dealing with classified materials. As has been reported on multiple occasions, any released emails deemed classified by the administration have been done so after the fact, and not at the time they were transmitted.”
CNBC:
In the course of the email review, State Department officials determined that some information in the messages should be retroactively classified. In the 3,000 pages that were released, for example, portions of two dozen emails were redacted because they were upgraded to "classified status." But none of those were marked as classified at the time Mrs. Clinton handled them.
 

This is the heart of the matter. Transmission of classified materials on a private server is a violation of Federal law. Between then number of devices and soliciting information from Sid Blumenthal, Clinton has lied repeatedly about her emails.

Clinton DID have classified information on her server.

(Excerpt) Read more at floppingaces.net...


TOPICS: Government; Politics
KEYWORDS: clinton; mediabias; nytimes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: GrandJediMasterYoda

He’s a businessman who has no problem abusing other people’s property rights via eminent domain to get his way, IIRC.


21 posted on 07/24/2015 7:04:46 PM PDT by piasa (Attitude adjustments offered here free of charge)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: piasa

Where? Show me an example. And if he did do that I can guarantee you the person deserved it.


22 posted on 07/24/2015 7:12:16 PM PDT by GrandJediMasterYoda (B. Hussein Obama: 20 acts of Treason and counting.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

I strongly suspect owebama is behind this.

Why would he want to derail the dhimmiecrat front-runner?

Two words: Vice President Joe Biden...


23 posted on 07/24/2015 8:03:30 PM PDT by 43north (BHO: 50% black, 50% white, 100% RED.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

This makes her eminently qualified to be president.


24 posted on 07/24/2015 8:08:23 PM PDT by TBP (Obama lies, Granny dies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

The Pope is also Catholic.


25 posted on 07/24/2015 9:38:34 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy

No, Petraeus got fined but no jail time, only probation.

Also, Petraeus was not handling classified information in a way that RISKED a leak. He outright gave the stuff to his biographer (i.e., the woman with whom he was committing adultery).


26 posted on 07/24/2015 10:39:05 PM PDT by Eagle Forgotten
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Starman417

27 posted on 07/25/2015 6:04:34 AM PDT by Bon mots (Relax, I'm joking. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: laplata
Obama has Hitlery over a barrel. She should be sweating.

I hope she uses a lot of Jack Daniels for comfort.

I'll drink to that!
drunk hillary clinton

28 posted on 07/25/2015 6:07:04 AM PDT by Bon mots (Relax, I'm joking. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: A CA Guy
Petraeus was fined $100,000.00 and got 2 years probation, but did nothing half as bad as Hillary.
29 posted on 07/25/2015 6:10:35 AM PDT by Bon mots (Relax, I'm joking. :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Bon mots

LOL


30 posted on 07/25/2015 7:23:57 AM PDT by laplata ( Liberals/Progressives have diseased mindNo excuses ons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson