Posted on 02/16/2016 8:09:42 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
It was 2013 and I was road tripping out in the American south west. I was lucky enough to get a car with Sirius satellite radio which meant even in the most remote locales of the country I was able to listen to pretty much whatever I wanted. So there I was, in Canyonlands National Park, far far away from the only civilization in Moab, when a hilarious comedian by the name of Amy Schumer came on the air.
She was funny. She was hilarious. She made my trip all that much enjoyable.
And I took a note in my little notepad to look her up when I returned home.
But like many items on my to do list, I forgot to look her up. And whereas normally this would mean the name "Amy Schumer" would likely forever be lost on a piece of paper as I unconsciously threw it in the garbage, I would NEVER forget Amy Schumer because at about that same time the
traditional media social media alternative media print media and Hollywood
went gangbusters promoting the hell out of Amy Schumer, ne'er letting me forget this woman existed.
Oddly, however, it wasn't her comedy as much as it was just...well...her they were promoting. Not that she had done anything amazing (aside from her comedy), but quite the opposite. She was just your average, obese American woman, and the media had launched a cognizant and purposeful campaign blitz celebrating that fact.
She was Amy Schumer! She was large and in charge! She was body-positive! And she's all about feminism!
3 years later neither you nor I can go a week without seeing her on some social media meme, on the cover of a trashy grocery store magazine, or some other such theatrics blasted over the internet.
She's Amy Schumer! And by god she's overweight! And she's in your face about it! And we're going to celebrate this fact! HA!
Naturally, this in-your-face-24-7-Amy-Schumer-channel has ruffled the feathers of conservatives, libertarians, or people who just don't like being told what they should and should not find attractive. But in addition to this (intended and planned) revulsion, a common question coming from my conservative and libertarian circles, AS WELL as some associates of mine on the left is:
Why the hell is Amy Schumer so popular?
And it is here a very important lesson lies for us all, regardless of politics, So strap in lieutenants and pour yourselves a stiff one because in understanding why Amy Schumer is so popular you will be able to attain an element of serenity and calm previously not had before.
By all measures of sanity and logic Amy Schumer should be popular because of her comedy and humor. My hatred for her does not blind me to the fact she is an incredibly talented comedian and is one of the funniest people I've heard. But if you look at nearly ALL of the media, attention, and hype Schumer has received in the past couple of years it has NOT been to promote her comedy, her humor, or her literary works, but rather push a political agenda, namely one of fat acceptance (and to a larger extent, feminism).
A sane and logical mind would ask "what gives?" Why would she abandon her true talent of humor to become just another harpy harping on fat-acceptance and feminism? The market is flooded with such women, and it certainly is not as rewarding as being a comedian.
But while you're focusing on her talent as a humorist (and the general hatred that mars the world of feminism), what you fail to see is a market that is MUCH larger than the comedy market, and one that is much more profitable:
Pretty lies.
Currently the largest industry in the world right now is government. Governments are the largest organizations by far, they are the largest consumers of resources, and they employ the most amount of people. But in Western governments in particular the primary service they provide is not
defense roads infrastructure cops or judicial systems
but rather...
pretty lies.
And these lies are told with the sole purpose of getting corrupt politicians re-elected so they can avoid real jobs in the real world/private sector.
You're not poor because you had 6 children from 4 different fathers. You're poor because you're black and whitey hates you.
You're not making 76% of what men make because you majored in "French Lesbian Communication Studies." You're making 76% of what men make because "sexism."
And you're not an overpaid union member who drove jobs overseas with your bloated pay. You're a victim of "The Evil Corporations Maaaaan!"
This racket is a multi-trillion dollar industry and is the largest scam ran on all of humanity....
except for religion.
It is no coincidence that the predecessor to government was religion. Previous to those evil-white-males introducing secular government and ending the pointless deaths caused by theocracies, religion was the state and maintained this age-long multi-trillion dollar racket by providing the same service modern day governments do:
Pretty lies.
"There's an afterlife!" "You're immortal! You're all going to heaven!" "You're the chosen ones!" "You are superior to non-believers!" "You have the right to kill them all!" "And take all their stuff!"
It's the same thing governments do today, but with "god" and immortality as the prominent lies.
But while you'd think religion and governments have a duopoly on this market, think again. The human demand for pretty lies is insatiable. There's trillions more to go around! And the private sector also wants its share of this racket.
Enter in:
the media Hollywood the fashion industry Oprah/The View/Daytime talk shows Reality TV Academia
and a whole host of other industries designed to lie right to people's faces so they mindlessly part with their money.
And that is the industry Amy Schumer is in.
Sadly, the free market has determined that Amy's skills as a comedian, though impressive, are outshone by her ability to sell lies. Yes there are likely thousands, tens of thousands, even perhaps millions of people who would buy her DVD or buy tickets to her shows. But there is MORE demand from (predominantly) overweight women who want to believe that there is something wrong with society and men for liking and being attracted to skinny chicks. Thus why nobody has heard of Amy's latest comedy tour (if she even has one), but EVERYBODY knows how fat her thighs look.
The result is the confusion (and frustration) we're all enduring over the inexplicable popularity of Amy Schumer. She is not an actress of any type, she isn't funny when propagandizing politics, and I really am sick and tired of seeing her fat ass showing up everywhere on facebook. However, we all have to realize that all of this "Amy Schumer All the Time Show" is not intended for us, but rather the mindless sheeple whose lives are so void of meaning they need to live off of lies.
Schumer's antics are not to agitate conservatives or libertarians. Schumer's showmanship is not to anger men over what they should or should not find attractive. Just like People Magazine, the "Schumer Media Blitz" is to tell sad, pitiful women the lie that big is beautiful, all women are gorgeous, and they can "have it all" (TM), etc. etc.
There is of course a problem.
These lies don't come free
Yes there are the few dollars here or there women spend on magazines or any media outlet willing to publish a body-positive piece of propaganda. And yes, anybody using Ms. Schumer as a marketing tool will get those ladies' hard earned dollars as well. But the real price is these women waste their lives in a delusional world thinking:
Big is beautiful! "Loud and proud" is a noble aim. And men are shallow for not liking overweight, obnoxious women!
Which condemns them to living in a delusional world, guaranteeing them no real success with the opposite sex, finding a quality man, or having a healthy, functional family. They will have wasted their one shot in life, their minute spark of existence in this universe on lies, and that's a higher price paid than all the taxes paid to governments and all the tithes paid into all the world's religions. If you think about it, it's actually quite precious and full of poetic justice. It almost makes you want to cheer Ms. Schumer on.
How familiar *are* you with the manosphere, before I answer you? It will determine the scope of my response.
You mean those male feminists? Not very? They think they are against feminism, but really they syupport it, whether they know it or not.
Suffice it to say many manospherians have given up on American / Western European woman as too influenced by feminism, and recommend that men wanting a wife go to parts of Brazil / Central America, or Eastern Europe, or the Philippines, to find women who are still socialized into traditional femininity...but *not* to bring the women back to the US lest they become corrupted.
Blank.............
That is about as chubby as I like.....
You do realize that's a joke, right? If they are so against feiminism, how come their ideology supports the feminist agenda 100% and gives feminists everything they want?
Face it, those red pill people pretend to be one thing, but they are just lapdogs to the feminist agenda.
I know all about the Red Pill concepts. It's all about low-testosterone wimps, who emasculate themselves while pretending to oppose feminsim. That about sums it up.
MGTOW could be said to, in a certain light, except it reduces the available supply of marriageable men. ("Where have all the good men gone?" and all that.)
But certainly not the others.
Obese, really?
She might not be a wait, but she looks perfectly normal to me.
Feminists are against: marriage, traditional Western values, family values, Religion (especially Christianity). And don't Red Pillites deliver all that?
Doesn’t MGTOW give the feminists what the wanted since the 60’s? It was practically invented by Gloria Steinem and Betty Friedan.
Which is a huge feminist victory. They would like women to not want to get married, but they have never been able to accomplish that goal completely.
Secondly, there are a number of Red Pillers who are not PUAs: (Rollo Tomassi, Social Pathologist, Glenn Reynolds aka "Instapundit") and even some PUAs (RooshV) are beginning to publicly question whether sexual libertinism coupled with nihilism is satisfying. Return of Kings has had a number of guest posts by Catholic contributors.
While the overlords have been pressing for zero population growth, for Americans the birthrate is negative - that is the reason for trying to shame men into marriage. The white middle-aged childless women I work with really resent the Hispanic and black women for their families; those women are raising families, while the white ones are raising pets and plants.
Very interesting observation, KI2.
Are the women saying this because there is a dearth of husband material?
Good start to the day.
Thanks :)
C H U C K
Her angry pig face is a real turnoff.
Thanks; I don’t think the problem is a dearth of husband material, but the dearth of husbands willing to have children with them. Some wait years and years, finally getting married when the guy figures kids are out of the question biologically. Nowadays plenty of women earn more than guys (so the guys don’t fear alimony); they know the clincher is losing their children (and future earnings to child support).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.