Skip to comments.
Email Scandal: A Desperate Clinton Lashes Out At Independent Investigators
Investor's Business Daily ^
| 3/4/2016
| Staff
Posted on 03/05/2016 5:11:37 AM PST by IBD editorial writer
Election 2016: If Hillary Clintons increasingly reckless attempts to spin conspiracy theories are any indication, shes far more worried about her email scandal than she lets on. Witness her recent attempts to smear independent investigators.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...
TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: emailscandal; hillaryclinton
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
To: LMAO
You’re correct.
And remember both of Bill’s wins were plurality.
He never got over 50% backing.
41
posted on
03/05/2016 7:52:39 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
To: randita
Bets on how long the “lackey” stays alive?
42
posted on
03/05/2016 7:53:24 AM PST
by
goodnesswins
(Alinsky.....it's what's for dinner)
To: jack308
As the newspaper industry implodes, they have retired/downsized much of their experienced help.
A lot of the staff now is low priced youngsters desperate to take any job in the Era of Baraq to pay those ginormous student loans.
43
posted on
03/05/2016 7:57:56 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
To: IBD editorial writer
Another classless self-promotion attempt to get clicks to your website.
SHAME ON YOU!
44
posted on
03/05/2016 8:01:30 AM PST
by
newfreep
(TRUMP & <S>Cruz</S> 2016 - "Evil succeeds when good men do nothing" - Edmund Burke)
To: IBD editorial writer
When they moved Hillary’s e-mail server, they found OJ’s knife under it. ;-)
45
posted on
03/05/2016 8:02:44 AM PST
by
r_barton
To: GreenHornet
If the plan is to bring Biden in, most likely they'll wait until Hillary has enough delegates to secure the nomination. At that point, they can drop the hammer on her and force her out of the race. Her delegates will then be free to vote for whoever they want, thereby denying Bernie the nomination in favor of Biden. Maybe but that might look like they're denying a woman. They might try to pull the same thing but with Elizabeth Warren. The problem with Warren is that she really doesn't have that much name recognition so it would be tough for her to catch up.
To: IBD editorial writer
Was I hallucinating...or did I hear her say,the other day, *They're not investigating me....they're investigating my emails*
47
posted on
03/05/2016 8:07:34 AM PST
by
Daffynition
(*Security, confiscate their coats. Get them out of here. It's 10 below zero out there ~DJT)
To: IBD editorial writer
Need help with picturing how the FBI is documenting the transfer of SAP information to the SOS - current Visio chart is a little overdone - comments earnestly solicited. Revision will be posted later today.
48
posted on
03/05/2016 8:14:44 AM PST
by
gryffen
(1st time poster - longtime reader)
To: gryffen
Good work.
I wonder who the peon level transcribers were? Govt employees or Clinton Foundation drones?
49
posted on
03/05/2016 8:18:48 AM PST
by
nascarnation
(RIP Scalia. Godspeed)
To: realcleanguy
If they had offered immunity to Sandy Berger..AND if he would have taken it, those charges would have been filed years ago. But he fell on the sword and got great deals for himself in China.
50
posted on
03/05/2016 8:25:38 AM PST
by
SueRae
(An election like no other..)
To: The Antiyuppie
You’re right! Grammar! D’oh
51
posted on
03/05/2016 8:32:26 AM PST
by
jack308
To: GreenHornet
If the plan is to bring Biden in, most likely they'll wait until Hillary has enough delegates to secure the nomination. At that point, they can drop the hammer on her and force her out of the race. Her delegates will then be free to vote for whoever they want, thereby denying Bernie the nomination in favor of Biden
But before and after they do that, watching the fervent and vocal Bernie supporters tear up the room will be the stuff of which popcorn fests are made!
And I wouldn't rule out Lizzie "Dances with Moonbats" throwing her tomahawk into the ring either.
52
posted on
03/05/2016 8:45:23 AM PST
by
LostInBayport
(When there are more people riding in the cart than there are pulling it, the cart stops moving...)
To: Elsie
53
posted on
03/05/2016 9:11:20 AM PST
by
Hoosier-Daddy
("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
To: IBD editorial writer
I am waiting for Shrillary to comment:
“OFF WITH THEIR HEADS”.
She sure thinks she is teflon.
To: bert
Chelsea Clinton is a ‘Director’ of the Clinton Foundation-—at a salary of $400,000 per year.\
Chelsea lives in NYC—in a $10 million condo. How much time does she spend doing this highly paid job?
Meanwhile, the witch of a mother cries out at every campaign stop about how much “CEO’s” & others are paid when the little guy just works for wages......
Cannot demonstrate hippocracy any better than being Shrillary Clinton.
To: gryffen
You missed the easiest way to move the information. Print out the info from the SIPR, then scan it on the non-secure side.
Also, SAP would be on JWICS, not SIPR. Not all classified information is SAP (or SCI).
To: LMAO
Are you talking about the guy with credible rape charges against him? The Bill Cosby of the Democrat Party?
57
posted on
03/05/2016 10:50:01 AM PST
by
GOPJ
To: nascarnation
My bet is that it has to be someone well above peon level and that Jacob (Jake) Sullivan, Clintons deputy chief of staff as SOS, will be offered immunity soon. Little doubt SAP information found retyped in emails to HRC can be traced back to a person(s) who reported directly to her.
58
posted on
03/05/2016 11:30:45 AM PST
by
gryffen
(1st time poster - longtime reader)
To: IndispensableDestiny
Thanks for corrections, just what I hoped to get and I will modify chart.
59
posted on
03/05/2016 11:30:45 AM PST
by
gryffen
(1st time poster - longtime reader)
To: TwelveOfTwenty
When has a corrupt Clinton ever had to pay for any of their crimes? Why should she think this time is somehow different,
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-65 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson